'Examination of new evidence in the court of appeals' Law and Politics nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Panokin A.M. Examination of new evidence in the court of appeals

Published in journal "Law and Politics", 2016-7 in rubric "JUDICIAL POWER", pages 902-909.

Resume: This work studies the issues of proof in the court of appeals, namely the questions of examination of new evidence, which received the assessment of the court of first instance, examinations on file that were not examined by the court of first instance, as well as examinations by the same rules of new evidence presented by the parties. An important place belongs to the analysis of the normative legal regulations and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, and courts of appeal of a number of the constituents of the Russian Federation on the issue of examination of new evidence in the courts of appeal. The author makes a conclusion on the need to overcome the current practice of hearing of a case in a court of appeals without examination of evidence, which does not allow to increase the level of legal protection of rights, freedoms, and legal interests of citizens and organizations involved in the sphere of criminal procedure that are guaranteed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws.

Keywords: Proof, Verification of evidence, Examination of evidence, Additional materials, Cassation, New evidence, Evidence, Court of appeals, Court of first instance, Appeal

DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.7.13290

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Solov'eva N. A., Trishina N. T. Yuridiko-fakticheskaya proverka prigovora v apellyatsionnom proizvodstve: monografiya. M., 2013. 184 S.
Shmeleva E. S. Pravovoe regulirovanie apellyatsionnogo proizvodstva v sovremennom rossiyskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: monografiya. Orenburg, 2009. 322 S
Chervotkin A. S. Apellyatsiya i kassatsiya: posobie dlya sudey. M., 2013. 336 S.
Smirnov A. V. Reforma poryadka peresmotra sudebnykh resheniy po ugolovnym delam: apellyatsiya//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus. 2011.
Potapov V. D. Osnovnye nachala proverki sudebnykh resheniy v kontrol'no-proverochnykh stadiyakh i proizvodstvakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii: monografiya//red.: Zaytsev O. A. M., 2012. 376 S.
Panokin A. M. Poryadok rassmotreniya soobshcheniya o prestuplenii v ugolovnom protsesse//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. 11 (36). S. 1461-1465.
Petrukhin I. L. Zapret povorota k khudshemu v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse//Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. 3. S. 46-53.
Panokin A. M. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. 4 (29). S. 483-490.
Diner A. A., Martynyakhin L. F., Senin N. N. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo v rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2003. 112 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy apellyatsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. 12 (37). S. 1619-1624.
Golovkov V. L. Apellyatsionnoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Izhevsk, 2004. 314 S.
Voskobitova L. A. Apellyatsiya printsipial'no novyy institut v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Apellyatsiya: realii, tendentsii i perspektivy. M., 2013. S. 35-42.
Ashirbekova M. T. Novye dokazatel'stva v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii//Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. 5. S. 22-24.
Budnikov V. L. Uchastie suda v ugolovno-protsessual'nom dokazyvanii//Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2006. 1. S. 13-15//SPS Konsul'tantPlyus.
Afanas'eva S. I., Borisevich, G. Ya., Dobrovlyanina, O. V. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k glave 45.1 Ugolovno-protsessual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii Proizvodstvo v sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii. Perm', 2014. 84 S.
Apellyatsiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie//red.: Ershov V. V. M., 2013. 352 S.
D.V. Danilenko. Sostyazatel'nost' universal'nyy printsip sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. 2010. 4
N. I. Manyak Obzhalovanie sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 12. - C. 2047 - 2052.
Afanas'yadi V.G. Realizatsiya rezul'tatov operativno-rozysknoy deyatel'nosti
v dokazyvanii po ugolovnym delam o nezakonnom usynovlenii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 811 - 814. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9283.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo. - 2013. - 2. - C. 62 - 76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
Sidorov E.I. Predmet dokazyvaniya i dokazatel'stva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 9. - C. 907 - 911. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.9.12459.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard