Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Dlugach T.B. Debate on upbringing (J. J. Rousseau, C. A. Helvétius)

Abstract: This article explores the polemic between the renowned enlighteners Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Claude Adrien Helvétius on the question of upbringing.  How does one raise an enlightened member of society? Rousseau believes that teaching should be conducted individually, leaving the student and mentor out in the nature. Helvétius leans towards collective education. But both believe that the upbringing should take place in a village. Rousseau supports the religious and fairly limited upbringing, while Helvétius is against religion and in support of higher education. The specificity in Helvétius’ understanding of human leads him to paradoxes, analyzed by Denis Diderot. The upbringing means of the Age of Enlightenment are being carefully examined for the first time. The author compares the views of Rousseau and Helvétius on the utmost important factors – religious, anti-religious, moral, educational, and professional. A special attention is given to the paradoxes in thinking that result from Helvétius’ understanding of human being. The author provides explanation to the paradoxes as dialectical contradictions intrinsic to Enlightenment.  


Keywords:

Friendship, Village, Society, Education, Morality, Religion, Paradox, State, Educator, Influence


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Radlov E.L. K. Gel'vetsiy i ego vliyanie v Rossii. Pg., 1917. 28 s. (2-e izd. M.: Lan', 2013. 24 s.).
2. Mapel'man V.M. Istoriko-filosofskiy podkhod k gumannoy pedagogike
3. (dostizheniya, utopii, illyuzii) // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2011. ¹ 3. C. 28 - 36.
4. Lanson G. Istoriya frantsuzskoy literatury. Sovremennaya epokha. M.: Izd-vo Yu.I. Lepkovskago, 1909. 258 s.
5. Deborin A.M. Ocherki po istorii materializma XVII-XVIII vv. Ot Frensisa Bekona do Deni Didro. 4-e izd. M.: Librokom, 2012. 304 s.
6. Vertsman I.E. Zhan-Zhak Russo. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1976. 310 s.
7. Istoriya Frantsii: v 3 t. / Red. A.Z. Manfreda. M.: Nauka, 1972-1973. T. 1 – 359 s.; T. 2 – 663 s.; T. 3 – 599 s.
8. Gel'vetsiy K.A. Soch.: v 2 t. T. 2. O cheloveke / Sost., obshch. red. Kh.N. Momdzhyana. M.: Mysl', 1974. 687 s.
9. Russo Zh.-Zh. Pedagogicheskie sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 1. Emil', ili O vospitanii / Sost. A.N. Dzhurinskiy, red. G.N. Dzhibladze. M.: Pedagogika, 1981. 656 s.