'Representations about an Enemy of persons with different self-efficacy and self-relation' National Security / nota bene nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Al'perovich V.D. Representations about an Enemy of persons with different self-efficacy and self-relation

Published in journal "National Security / nota bene", 2016-2 in rubric "Person and citizen within security systems", pages 294-299.

Resume: Abstract: Problem of influence of the self-relation on personal representations of Other as Enemy is touched by us in this article. Research goal was the comparative analysis of psychosocial characteristics of the representations about an Enemy of persons with different characteristics of the self-relation and of the self-efficacy. Psychosocial characteristics of the personal representations about an Enemy, the personal self-relation parameters (intensity of the self-esteem, of the self-sympathy, of the waiting of the Others' positive relation, of the self-interest) and levels of the self-efficacy were the research subject. We applied qualitative and quantitative methods: tests, categorical analysis of representations, statistics (frequencies, cluster analysis, nonparametric test). The results of the study prove that: respondents, perceiving the Enemy as aggressor, manipulator, demonstrate the low levels of the self-efficacy, of the self-interest, of the self-sympathy, of the self-esteem, of the waiting of the Others'relation; respondents, perceiving the Enemy as the subject with alien cognitions and values, demonstrate the upper levels of the self-efficacy, of the self-interest, of the self-sympathy, of the self-esteem, of the waiting of the Others' positive relation. Data supported the hypothesis about the distinctions of personal representations of Enemy depending upon characteristics of the self-relation and of the self-efficacy. The results can be applied to the psychosocial consultation, to the programs of the tolerance trainings in the antiterrorist activity.

Keywords: self-efficacy, self-interest, relations system, self-sympathy, self-esteem, self-relation, Enemy, representations, Other, representations about an Enemy

DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2016.2.15608

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Bandura A. Teoriya samoeffektivnosti // Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2000. T. 21. 1. S. 4-11.
Berns R. Razvitie Ya-kontseptsii i vospitanie. M.: Progress, 1986. 420 s.
Gaydar M.I. Lichnostnaya samoeffektivnost' studentov-psikhologov // Rossiyskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. T. 5. 1. S. 75-77.
Gordeeva T.O., Shepeleva E.A. Tendernye razlichiya v akademicheskoy i sotsial'noy samoeffektivnosti i koping-strategiyakh u sovremennykh rossiyskikh podro-stkov // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya. 2006. 3. S. 78-85.
Emel'yanova T.P. Konstruirovanie sotsial'nykh predstavleniy v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva. M.: IP RAN, 2006. 400 s.
Znakov V.V. Obraz vraga kak psikhologicheskoe osnovanie ponimaniya musul'manskikh terroristov rossiyanami // Voprosy psikhologii. 2012. 2. S. 23-35.
Kozyrev G.I. Vrag i Obraz vraga v obshchestvennykh i politicheskikh otnosheniyakh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. 1. S. 31-39.
Kolyshko A.M. Psikhologiya samootnosheniya. Grodno: Izd-vo GrGU, 2004. 102 s.
Krichevskiy R.L. Samoeffektivnost' i akmeologicheskiy podkhod k issledovaniyu lichnosti // Akmeologiya. 2001. 1. S. 47-52.
Labunskaya V.A. Obraz vraga v mezhlichnostnom obshchenii // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2013. 3. S. 52-65.
Mititsina E.A., Ivanova N.V. Kar'ernye orientatsii spetsialistov s vysokim urovnem samoeffektivnosti v professional'noy deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki. 2008. 5. S. 121-125.
Pantileev S.R. Samootnoshenie kak emotsional'no-otsenochnaya sistema. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1991. 108 s.
Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1983. 286 s.
Tulinova D.N. Predstavleniya o Vrage i Druge v svyazi s otnosheniem k zhizni na razlichnykh etapakh. Dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2005. 288 s.
Chesnokova I.I. Osobennosti razvitiya samosoznaniya v ontogeneze // Printsip razvitiya v psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 316-366.
Shirkov Yu.E. Strategii samokategorizatsii v sisteme predstavleniy o svoikh i chuzhikh. Avtoref. dis. kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2009. 29 s.
Shkurko T.A. Otnosheniya k svoim/chuzhim, blizkim/dalekim zhiteley gorodov raznogo tipa // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2013. 4. S. 81-94.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard