Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Belokrylova E.A., Kologermanskaya E.M. Peculiarities of the realization of citizens’ rights to favorable environment in the Russian Federation and India: comparative law analysis

Abstract: The main object of this research is the comparative law analysis of the relations in the area of fundamental environmental rights in the Russian Federation and India, as well as the key means of their protection. The subject of this research is the right of a human and citizen to favorable environment, its key elements, as well as the mechanism of its legal realization. In the comparative legal context, the authors research the positions of the Constitutions of the Russian Federation and India, which establish the rights to a favorable environment. A special attention is given to such issues as the legal status of the branches of government authority involved in the process of protection of the right to favorable environment in Russia and India, and highlight the special role of the judicial branches in the legislative branch of power, as well as the importance of court decisions in the environmental legislation of India. The authors highlight the general and distinctive features of other legal principles aimed at protection of the right of every individual to favorable environment in Russia and India.


Keywords:

Comparative law methodology, environmental law of the Russian Federation, environmental law of India, favorable environment, environmental protection, Ministry of Natural Resources, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, India Supreme Court, India Environmental Act, environmental rights


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Divan Shyam, Rosencranz Arimin Environmental Law and Policy in India. Cases, Materials and Statuse. Oxford University Press. 2002, P.49-50.
2. Kuzin F.A. Magisterskaya dissertatsiya / F.A.Kuzin.-M.: Os', 1997 s. 21.
3. Lafitskiy V.I. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v obrazakh prava. Tom pervyy.-M.: Statut, 2010. – str. 50.
4. Saidov A.Kh Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. M.: Yurist', 2003. – str. 21.
5. Ruzavin G.I. Metodologiya nauchnogo poznaniya: Ucheb.posobie dlya vuzov. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2009. – str.6.
6. Ippolitova N.V. Vzaimosvyaz' ponyatiy «metodologiya» i «metodologicheskikh podkhod» // Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya Obrazovanie. Pedagogicheskie nauki.-¹ 13 (146). – 2009, s. 9-15.http://www.ippolitova.info/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=78:art02&catid=39:articles&Itemid=67 [dostup 22.02.2014].
7. Petrov. A. Osnovnye kontsepty kompetentnostnogo podkhoda kak metodologicheskoy kategorii / A.Petrov // Alma mater. 2005. ¹ 2 S. 54-58.
8. Ofitsial'nyy tekst Konstitutsii Indii 1950 http://www.constitution.org/cons/india/const.html [dostup 20.02.2013].