Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Karpovich O.G. Comparative analysis of federalism in Australia and Canada

Abstract: This article is devoted to the comparative analysis of federalism in Australia and Canada. The research object is the modern federalism as the organizing principle of the Union State and the federal structure of Australia and Canada. The research subject is the similarities and differences in the models of the Federation of Australia (Commonwealth of Australia) and Canada (which is a constitutional monarchy and, at the same time, a federal state). The purpose of the research is to identify the major similarities and differences between the models of federal state in Australia and Canada.The methodological basis of the research is the system, structural and functional, and comparative political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, and observation.The author draws attention to the fact that federalism in Australia, as opposed to federalism in Canada, is more harmonious and balanced, despite the similar conditions of states creating and taking into account their common colonial past. At the same time, the Australian federalism is characterized by a number of paradoxes which differ the Australian model from the Canadian one and condition its internal inconsistency. 


Keywords:

geopolitics, federalism, world policy, global instability, international relations, diplomacy, interests, state, security, risks


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sobranie konstitutsionnykh aktov : [V 5-ti vyp.].-M. : V. M. Sablin, 1905-1906.-(Politicheskaya biblioteka; ¹ 3). Vyp. 5 : Konstitutsii: Avstralii. Yaponii. Bel'gii.-1906.-2, 46 s. .-(Politicheskaya biblioteka; ¹ 3).
2. Milne D. The Hew Canadian Constitution. – Toronto: James Jorimer & Company, Publishers, 1982.-240 s..
3. McWhinneu E. Canada and the Constitution, 1979-l982.-Toronto, 1982.-241 c.
4. Burdukova I.I., Chistyakov A.N., Borzova E.P. Politicheskie i izbiratel'nye sistemy. Gosudarstva Britanskogo sodruzhestva. SPbKO, 2013.
5. Mochalov A.N. Sravnitel'nyy federalizm Rossii i Avstralii. M. 2012 .
6. Gontareva I.B. Politicheskiy analiz kontseptsii federalizma. – Orenburg: Yuzhnyy Ural 202 g. – 340 s.
7. Richard P. Natan, Erik P. Khoffmann Sovremennyy federalizm. Sovremennyy federalizm // Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'.-1991.-¹ 4.
8. Manoylo A.V. Ukrainskiy krizis i «upravlyaemyy khaos»: sled «tsvetnykh revolyutsiy» Arabskoy Vesny. // Vlast'. 2014. ¹4. S. 24-28.
9. Manoylo A.V. Informatsionnoe protivoborstvo v usloviyakh psikhologicheskoy voyny. // Zakon i pravo.-2003.-¹12. – S. 31-34.
10. Sledzevskiy I.V., Filippov V.R., Khabenskaya E.O. Vliyanie SMI na formirovanie etnicheskikh stereotipov obshchestvennogo soznaniya v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2005.
11. Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskiy ocherk / Ser. Istoriya nauki. M., 2010.
12. Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo pered litsom sotsial'nogo krizisa (dve paradigmy: rossiyskaya i frantsuzskaya) // Ezhegodnyy doklad Seti etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. 2005. Moskva, 2006. S. 12-25.
13. Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
14. Bunevich D.S. Krymskiy krizis 2014 goda i sozdanie novoy arkhitektury mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.2.14333.
15. Raykhlin E.I. Avraam Linkol'n i vtoraya amerikanskaya revolyutsiya // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 2. - C. 62 - 85. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.2.9464. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9464.html
16. Raykhlin E.I. Sotvorili li oni istoriyu ili istoriya sotvorila ikh? // Mirovaya politika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 27 - 46. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2013.4.9421. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9421.html
17. Filippov V.R. Territorial'nye konflikty i perspektiva izmeneniya granits na afrikanskom kontinente // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2014. - 1. - C. 28 - 39. DOI: 10.7256/.2014.1.13041.
18. Karpovich O.G. Global'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v kontekste formiruyushchegosya mnogopolyarnogo mira // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 5. - C. 620 - 629. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11787.
19. Skripnichenko D.V. Territorial'noe i natsional'noe izmerenie federalizma // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 21 - 25. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2014.1.10774.