Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Police activity
Reference:

Kuznetsova T.V., Kuznetsova O.A. Illegal takeover of business as a form of economic crime: pro et contra

Abstract: The long dispute over the protection of business owners’ rights in the cases of illegal takeovers of business has been solved by amending the current criminal law with several articles, which provide punishment for such criminal actions. Most legal novels of this kind are contained in the chapter 22 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and are officially recognized as crimes in the economic sphere. The analysis of regulatory provisions on illegal takeovers gives the reason for doubts both in the chosen form of the object of legal protection, and in the necessity to criminalize such actions. The research methodology is based on the historical analysis, comparative analysis, the method of division of notions, the system and statistical methods. The author concludes that: 1. the analysis of regulatory provisions on illegal takeovers gives the reason for doubts both in the chosen form of the object of legal protection, and in the necessity to criminalize such actions; 2. the commentaries of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the peculiarities of application of these provisions are necessary.


Keywords:

ekonomicheskie prestupleniya, ob'ekt ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany, interesy gosudarstvennoi vlasti, reiderskie zakhvaty, reglamentatsiya reiderskikh deistvii, reiderstvo, mezhdunarodnoe finansirovanie, khozyaistvuyushchii sub'ekt


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shagieva R.V., Bukalerova L.A. Edinye gosudarstvennye reestry kak predmet posyagatel'stv pri reyderstve: problemy teorii i praktiki // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 8. S. 111-112.
2. Mozheyko I.V. Piraty, korsary, reydery. M.: Avanta +, 2010. 416 s.
3. Slobodyanyuk D. Vladimir Putin predotvratil novuyu volnu «netsivilizovannogo zakhvata sobstvennosti» // Pravda. 2002. 6 avg. S. 5.
4. Tormozova T., Loginov A. Reyderstvo v Rossii i za rubezhom: sravnitel'nyy analiz // Rynok tsennykh bumag. 2007. ¹ 12. S. 63-75.
5. Lapshin V.F. Prestupleniya protiv interesov investorov. M.: RIOR, 2014. 127 s.
6. Lapshin V.F.Ekonomicheskie i reyderskie prestupleniya: pravovoe soderzhanie i voprosy sootnosheniya // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2014. ¹ 12. S. 82-88.
7. Lopashenko N. «Reyderstvo» // Zakonnost'. 2007. ¹ 4. S. 7-12.
8. Alekseev Yu.F. O rezul'tatakh raboty organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya MVD Rossii po protivodeystviyu reyderskim zakhvatam // Nedvizhimost' i investitsii. Pravovoe regulirovanie. 2009. ¹ 1. s. 11 // URL: http://dpr.ru/journal/journal_36_17.htm (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2015).
9. Kuznetsova T.V. Nekotorye aspekty reyderstva // Tendentsii i perspektivy razvitiya ugolovnogo i ugolovno protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva v bor'be s prestupnost'yu: Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy pamyati prof. B.S. Volkova. M.: RUDN, 2011. S. 111-116.