Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Prokhorov M.M. The fundamental abstraction of the theory of creativity

Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2016-1 in rubric "Tradition and innovation", pages 34-48.

Resume: The article highlights three types of extreme abstraction: first, in terms of the basic forms of relations traditions and innovations; second, in the plane of man's relationship to the world; thirdly, in axiological aspect. In the foreground are identified and described anti-interactionism, reductionism and dialectical relationship of tradition and innovation; shows the presence of the growth of their interaction, given categorization of traditional and technological cultures.In a second aspect explicated abstraction contemplative, activist and co-evolutionary type of creativity. They come in a generalizing model of man's relationship with the world; dictate the nature of the very broad sense of creative activity. Traditions and traditional culture corresponds to the contemplative type of attitudes toward the world, of fabricated - an innovative form of creativity and activist type of man's relationship to the world. Dialectical relationship corresponds to a co-evolutionary model of man's attitude with the world. A contemplative and activist opposed to creative types, but have the same ontological basis of antagonism as the conflict with the dominant "struggle of opposites." The co-evolution type of creativity dominated "unity of opposites", dialog with the relationship of man and the world.In axiological terms of creativity explicated as the opposite of simulation. They are rooted in the development of reality as opposed to progress and regress. The ascending branch of the being generates creativity, as its internal determinant of ensuring its existence and prolongation; in the context of degradation, there is a degeneration of thought and creativity, creativity is simulated, it is transformed into simulation as a means and function degeneration. They are connected "law of specular": the imitation of social laws are "mirror" of their action on the ascending branch of evolution.

Keywords: unity of opposites, co-evolution, activism (constructivism),, contemplation, reductionism, anti-interactionism, tradition and innovation, creativity, simulation, the law of specular

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.1.16348

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Prokhorov M.M. Smysly i tsennost' modeli otnosheniya cheloveka s mirom // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-¹ 7.-S.136-240. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.7.369. URL:http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_369.html.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya prava // Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya v XIV t. T. VII. M.-L.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1934. 380 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Filosofiya istorii // Gegel' G.V.F. Sochineniya v XIV t. T. VIII. M.-L.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1935. 470 s.
Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki: V 3 tt. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1974. 501 s.
Prokhorov M.M. Tekhnologicheskaya priroda religii. Nizhniy Novgorod: VGIPU, 2010. 327 s.
Rozin V. Myshlenie i tvorchestvo. M.: Per Se, 2006. 360 s.
Epshteyn M. Tekhnika – religiya – gumanistika//Voprosy filosofii. 2009. ¹ 12. S. 19-29.
Gurevich P.S. Poet o kul'ture // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-2.-C. 99-101. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2013.2.8846.
Gurevich P.S. Dostoinstva i iz'yany kreativnosti v obrazovanii // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2014.-4.-C. 4-7. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.4.14160.
Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: «bytie i nebytie» ili «bytie i sushchee»? // Filosofskaya mysl'.-2013.-5.-C. 1-102. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.5.284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html
Mashoshina A.A. Rol' kreativnosti lichnosti v postroenii zhiznennogo puti (metodicheskie aspekty) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2014.-2.-C. 201-207. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.2.10461.
Gurevich P.S., Spirova E.M. Lichnostnyy rost: teoriya i praktika (Otchet o rabote Laboratorii lichnostnogo rosta Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta) // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2011.-1.-C. 42-54.
Marks K., Engel's F. Manifest Kommunisticheskoy partii // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. T. 4. M.: Politizdat, 1955. S. 435.
Gurina M. Filosofiya. M.: Respublika, 1998. 540 s.
Voslenskiy M. Nomenklatura. M.: «Zakharov», 2005. 640 s.
Prokhorov M.M. Ekonomizm kak modal'nost' beschelovechnosti // Mirovozzrencheskaya paradigma v filosofii: Modusy i modal'nosti prakticheskie i teoreticheskie: Monografiya / Pod red. prof. M.M. Prokhorova. Nizhniy Novgorod: NF MESI, 2014. S. 188-210.
Zinov'ev A.A. Faktor ponimaniya. M.: Algoritm, 2006. 528 s.
Prokhorov M.M. Istoricheskoe opredelenie bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 2.-S.99-165. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012. 2.189. URL: http://e-notabene.ru /fr/article_189.html.
Prokhorov M.M. Fenomen ekonomizma // NB: Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 1.-S.67-78. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1. 10457.URL: http://e-notabene.ru /fr/article_113.html.
Prokhorov M.M. Atributivnoe opredelenie bytiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-¹ 5.-S.1-100. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012. 5.244. URL: http://e-notabene. ru/fr/article_244.html.
Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. 368 s.
Nikiforov A.L. Chto takoe «postneklassicheskaya nauka»? // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2013. T. XXXVI. ¹ 2. S. 59-64.
Stepin V.S. Okkul'tizm i magiya v sovremennom mire // Magicheskiy kristall: Magiya glazami uchenykh i charodeev. M.: Respublika, 1994. 527 s.
Losev A.F. O mirovozzrenii//Losev A.F. Derzanie dukha. M.: Politizdat, 1988. S. 313–314.
Tsiolkovskiy K.E. Ocherki o Vselennoy. Izd-e 2-oe. Kaluga, 2001. 384 s.
Shestov L. Afiny i Ierusalim // Shestov L. Sochineniya. T.1. M.: Nauka, 1993. S. 317-339.
Kiselev G.S. «Vtoraya Vselennaya»: drama svobody // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 3–17.
Saykina G.K. Trudno byt' chelovekom… (Metafizicheskie marshruty cheloveka). Kazan': Kazan. un-t, 2012. 428 s.
Demenok S.L. Plameneyushchaya istina. Ot izdatelya // Khyubner B. Martin Khaydegger – oderzhimyy bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 172 s.
Berdyaev N.A. Chelovek i mashina // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. ¹ 2. S. 147-166.
Khyubner B. Martin Khaydegger – oderzhimyy bytiem. SPb.: Akademiya issledovaniya kul'tury, 2011. 172 s.
Solodukho N.M. Filosofiya nebytiya v ochen' kratkom izlozhenii // Filosofiya. Yazyk. Poznanie. Kazan': Kazan. gos. energ. un-t, 2011. 248 s.
Prokhorov M.M. Dialektika «telesnosti» i virtual'nosti kak teoreticheskaya problema izucheniya zarodyshevykh form filosofskoy kul'tury // Fundamental'nye problemy kul'turologii v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. Teoriya kul'tury. SPB: Aleteyya, 2008. S. 203-214.
Prokhorov M.M. Filosofskie osnovaniya mirovozzreniya postneklassicheskoy epokhi. V 3 chastyakh. Ch. 1. Filosofiya osevogo vremeni. N. Novgorod: Izd-vo NF MESI, 2014. 224 s.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard