|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Administrative and municipal law
Reference:
Vinokurov A.Yu.
On particular issues of prosecutor’s participation in administrative proceedings
// Administrative and municipal law.
2016. ¹ 2.
P. 178-182.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67415
Vinokurov A.Yu. On particular issues of prosecutor’s participation in administrative proceedingsAbstract: The research subject is the range of general questions of the prosecutor’s legal status as a participant of administrative proceedings, regulated by the recently adopted Code of Administrative Code Proceedings of the Russian Federation. The author compares the Code’s provisions with the existing Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, emphasizes the positive sides of the novels and criticizes the shortcomings of legal regulation of the issues under consideration, offers the ways to improve legal norms. The author applies the comparative-legal method to compare the provisions of the legislation, regulating administrative and civil proceedings. The author defines the advantages of the novels, added to the legal status of the prosecutor, involved in administrative proceedings, and draws attention to the particular drawbacks in procedural legislation formulae, offering the possible ways of their improvement. This research is one of the first scientific works, devoted to the legal status of the prosecutor, involved in administrative proceedings. Keywords: administrative bill of complaint, administrative proceedings, administrative case, protection of rights of citizens, category of cases, general public, prosecutor, public interest, general jurisdiction court
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. SZ RF. – 2015. – ¹ 10. – St. 1391 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
2. SZ RF. – 2014. – ¹ 34. – St. 4398.
3. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 1 (ch. 1). – St. 1 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
4. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 30. – St. 3012 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
5. SZ RF. – 2002. – ¹ 46. – St. 4532 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
6. Sakhnova T.V. Dostizhimo li edinstvo tsivilisticheskogo protsessa? (v kontekste kontseptsii edinogo GPK RF i Kodeksa administrativnogo sudo-proizvodstva) // Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. – 2015. – ¹ 4. – S. 3 – 10
7. Serkov P.P. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe pravo i protsess. – 2015. – ¹ 2. – S. 29 – 33 i dr.
8. SZ RF. – 1995. – ¹ 47. – St. 4472 (s posled. izmeneniyami).
9. Nasonov Yu.G., Vyskub V.S. O nedostatkakh pravovogo regulirovaniya uchastiya prokurora v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve // Vestnik Akademii General'noy prokuratury Rossiyskoy Federatsii. – 2015. – ¹ 5. – S. 60-66.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
