|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Police activity
Reference:
Yarovenko V.V., Tereshchuk N.A.
Notion and types of expert mistakes
// Police activity.
2016. ¹ 1.
P. 54-67.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=67398
Yarovenko V.V., Tereshchuk N.A. Notion and types of expert mistakesAbstract: The authors consider scientific studies and expert practice on the problems of expert mistakes and their solution. The authors pay attention to expert’s competence and expert’s initiative, expert’s report about the questions, which can be solved without special knowledge. The expert has touched upon legal issues and based his conclusions not on the results of the study, but on the materials of the case. The analysis of the current condition allows concluding that expert mistakes should be considered in terms of particular expert situations. The study had been carried out in the period from 2000 till 2015. The authors analyze theoretical and empirical researches of other authors. The research methodology is based on the analysis of statutory acts, the doctrine and the practice of expertise. Significant attention is paid to the method of interpretation. The authors conclude that in cases when the expert falls beyond his competence, touches the issues of legal nature, provides opinion on the questions which can be solved without special knowledge, substantiates his opinion by the materials of the case, without considering particular expert situations, his opinion should not be considered as an expert mistake. Keywords: expert situation, special knowledge, questions, initiative, expert competence, types of mistakes, expert mistake, investigator, method, conclusion
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Yarovenko V.V., Yarovenko T.V. Problemy ekspertizy ognestrel'nogo i kholodnogo oruzhiya // Pravo i politika. ¹ 4 (112). 2010. S. 53.
2. Yarovenko V.V. Kholodnoe oruzhie kak ob''ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya // Vestnik UVD po Primorskomu krayu. ¹3 (9), 2009. S. 82.
3. Tikhonov E.N. Kriminalisticheskaya ekspertiza kholodnogo oruzhiya: Uchebnoe posobie. – Barnaul, Izd-vo AGU, 1983. S. 63.
4. Yarovenko V.V. K voprosu o primenenii spetsial'nykh znanii pri issledovanii oruzhiya, patronov i sledov vystrela // Protivodeistvie organizovannoi prestupnosti: ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty bor'by s torgovlei lyud'mi, nezakonnym oborotom narkotikov i oruzhiya, ekologicheskimi prestupleniyami: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 10-letiyu kafedry ugolovnogo protsessa, kriminalistiki i pravovoi informatiki RGU im. I. Kanta / Pod. red. T.S. Volchetskoi. – Kaliningrad: Izd-vo RGU im. I. Kanta, 2008.
5. Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹ 1737 ot 12 dekabrya 2005 g. Arkhiv EKTs UVD PK za 2005 god.
6. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyi kodeks Turetskoi Respubliki: perevod s turetskogo / [nauch. red. V.A. Orover]; [ per. R.S. Bagirzade]. Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 2015.
7. Yablokov N. Vozmozhnosti ekspertizy po tekhnike bezopasnosti i ee naznachenie // Sovetskaya yustitsiya. ¹16. 1964. S. 63.
8. Romanov N.S. O vozmozhnosti resheniya voprosa o narushenii pravil dvizheniya sudebnoi avtotekhnicheskoi ekspertizoi // Problemy sudebnoi ekspertizy. Vyp. 4. – M., 1961. S. 76.
9. Instruktsiya o proizvodstve sudebnykh avtotekhnicheskikh ekspertiz v ekspertnykh uchrezhdeniyakh sistemy Ministerstva yustitsii SSSR, utverzhdennoi Prikazom Minyusta SSSR ot 26 oktyabrya 1981 goda ¹20 (izm. i dop. na 12 oktyabrya 2006 g.).
10. Zaklyuchenie eksperta ot 22 avgusta 2006 goda. Arkhiv EKTs UVD Primorskogo kraya g. Vladivostoka.
11. Zaklyuchenie eksperta ¹175 ot 19 marta 2003 goda. Arkhiv EKU UVD PK za 2003 god.
12. Yarovenko V.V. Primenenie spetsial'nykh znanii pri issledovanii ob''ektov sudebnoi ballistiki (obzor praktiki) // Pravo i politika ¹4, 2012. S. 13.
13. Shklyar B.M. Nekotorye voprosy pravootnoshenii sledovatelya i eksperta pri proizvodstve sudebnoi ekspertizy // Ekspertiza pri rassledovanii prestuplenii (informatsionnye materialy). Vyp. 10. – Vil'nyus, 1972. S. 87.
14. Shlyakhov A.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: organizatsiya i provedenie.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1979. S. 93.
15. Petrukhin I.L. Ekspertiza kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. – M., 1964. S. 32.
16. Shlyakhov A.R. Voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy v novom UPK RSFSR // Sovetskaya yustitsiya, ¹1, 1961. S. 71.
17. Moryashova N.A. Problemy kriminalisticheskoi taktiki v usloviyakh sostyazatel'nosti storon. Diss. kand. yurid. nauk.-Vladivostok, 2004.
18. Saifiev R.I., Yarovenko V.V. Teoriya i praktika sovershenstvovaniya sredstv obnaruzheniya i fiksatsii nevidimykh sledov ruk: Ucheb. posobie. – Vladivostok: Izd-vo Dal'nevost. un-ta, 1994. S. 52.
19. Paliashvili A.Ya Ekspertiza v sude po ugolovnym delam. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1973. S. 64.
20. Novikov V. N. K voprosu ob ekspertnoi initsiative na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Aktual'nye voprosy pravovedeniya. Vyp. 11. – Tomsk, 1978. S. 71.
21. Mel'nik S.L.. Aktual'nye voprosy ekspertnoi initsiativy. Avtoref. kand. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2005. http://www.dissercat.com/content/aktualnye-voprosy-ekspertnoi-initsiativy#ixzz3LOYBRSeE. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
22. Zaklyuchenie mediko-kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy ¹ 143-MK ot 26.05.11 g. Arkhiv byuro sudebno-meditsinskoi ekspertizy po Primorskomu krayu za 2011 god.
23. Voronin S.E, Ugolovno-protsessual'naya situatsiya kak raznovidnost' sledstvennoi situatsii // Problemy ispol'zovaniya kriminalisticheskikh znanii v pravookhranitel'noi deyatel'nosti: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 30-letiyu kafedry kriminalistiki YuI TGU / pod. red.N.S. Dergacha. – Tomsk: Izdatel'skii Dom TGU, 2014. S. 42.
24. Krasnobaeva A.Yu. Ekspertnye oshibki, prichiny, posledstviya, profilaktika: avtoref. dis…kand. yurid. nauk. – Volgograd, 1997.
25. Aubakirova A.A.Sledstvennye i ekspertnye oshibki pri formirovanii vnutrennego ubezhdeniya. Avtoref. dokt. diss. yurid. nauk. – Chelyabinsk, 2010. http://lawtheses.com/sledstvennye-i-ekspertnye-oshibki-pri-formirovanii-vnutrennego-ubezhdeniya#ixzz3LOKaxG1s. Data obrashcheniya 12.12.2015 g.
26. Granovskii G.L. Priroda, prichiny ekspertnykh oshibok i puti ikh ustraneniya // Novye razrabotki i diskussionnye problemy teorii i praktiki sudebnoi ekspertizy. – M., 1983. S. 45.
27. Kudryavtseva A.V. Vnutrennee ubezhdenie eksperta i ego rol' v protsesse ekspertnogo issledovaniya./A.V. Kudryavtseva //Aktual'nye voprosy ugolovnogo protsessa sovremennoi Rossii: Mezhvuz. sb. nauchn. tr. Ufa. 2003. S. 91.
28. Pravila proizvodstva sudebno-meditsinskikh ekspertiz v mediko-kriminalisticheskikh otdeleniyakh laboratorii byuro sudebno-meditsinskoi ekspertizy (soglasovano s General'noi Prokuraturoi RF, Verkhovnym Sudom RF, Ministerstvom vnutrennikh del RF). Prikazom Minzdrava RF ot 14 sentyabrya 2001 g. ¹ 361 utratili silu.
29. Prigovor Pervomaiskogo raionnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 28 marta 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-42/11.
30. Prigovor Pervomaiskogo raionnogo suda g. Vladivostoka ot 3 maya 2011 goda po delu ¹ 1-45/11.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
