Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Toporina E.A. Aesthetic Peculiarities of Artistic Interpretation of Russian Classical Literature

Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2015-12 in rubric "Aesthetics", pages 1861-1866.

Resume: The article is devoted to some peculiarities of interpreting Russian classical writings when they are being transferred to other art forms. Much attention is paid to cinematography. Toporina has described such peculiarities as specific nature of the literary, cinema- and theatrical languages, the problem of defining the artistic interpretation (transfer), style, detail, national literary tradition, aesthetic component of a literary writing, problems of traditionalism and novelty as well as the role of personality in Russian literature. These peculiarities are defined through analyzing particular materials, i.e. modern artistic interpretations of Russian classical literary works. When writing her article, Toropina has appealed to classical fiction as well as literary, aesthetical and philosophical researches devoted to the problems of theoretical and artistic interpretation of texts. Conclusions: the researcher shows special features of a classical text as a source of active creative understanding in an artistic intepretation; describes peculiarities of artistic interpretation of classical literature as the way to convey the deepest meanings of classical literature through other artistic forms; examines peculiarities of artistic interpretation of Russian classical literature based on the analysis of particular artwork; attempts to analyze whether modern interpetations of classical literature are adequate. 

Keywords: world perception, human, realism, national literary tradition, artistic interpretation, Russian classical literature, distance, theatre, cinematography, compliance

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.12.14061

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Rudnev V.P. Slovar' kul'tury XX veka. M., 1997. S. 253.
Gacheva A.G. «Nam ne dano predugadat', Kak slovo nashe otzovetsya…»: (Dostoevskiy i Tyutchev). M., 2004. S.6.
Sm. Pechko L.P. Stili iskusstva: esteticheskie konteksty. Elets, 2010.
Frank S.L. S nami Bog // Frank S. L. Dukhovnye osnovy obshchestva. M., S. 304.
Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva. [Elektronnyy resurs] /M., 1979. Dostupno po adresu: http://teatr-lib.ru/Library/Bahtin/esthetic/. Data obrashcheniya: 25.09.2014.
Nabokov V.V. Kommentariy k romanu «Evgeniy Onegin». SPb., 1998. S. 593.
Tynyanov Yu.N. Pushkin i ego sovremenniki. M., 1969. S.158.
Azarova N.M. Tekst. Chast' I. M., 2002. S. 206.
Pushkin A.S. Pis'mo P.A. Vyazemskomu ot 4 noyabrya 1823 g.// Sobranie sochineniy v 10t. M., 1962. T.9. S.77.
O. Mandel'shtam. O prirode slova//Esteticheskoe samosoznanie russkoy kul'tury: 20-e gody XX veka. Antologiya. Sostavitel' G.A. Belaya. M., 2003. S.167.
Chekhov A.P. Povesti i rasskazy. M., 1997. S 261.
Tarkovskiy A.A. Lektsii po kinorezhissure: Stsenariy /Uroki rezhissury. M.,1993.S.19-20.
Volkova E.V. Proizvedenie iskusstva v mire khudozhestvennoy kul'tury. M., 1988. S.129-130.
Shlegel' F. Estetika. Filosofiya. Kritika. T.2. M., 1983. S.294.
Averintsev S.S. Glubokie korni obshchnosti// Sov. Muzyka, 1988. ¹11, S.76-83.
Stepanyan K.A. Yavlenie i dialog v romanakh F.M. Dostoevskogo. SPb., 2009. S.16.
Ganiyants Mariya «Fil'm Sergeya Ovcharova «Sad» po p'ese Chekhova predstavili v Moskve» RIA Novosti, Moskva, 29 oktyabrya 2008.
Shpet G.G. Esteticheskie fragmenty. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Dostupno po adresu:ModernLib.Ru.http://modernlib.ru/books/shpet_g/esteticheskie_fragmenti/read/. Data obrashcheniya: 26.09.2014.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard