Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Shipovalova L.V. The Modern Idea of the University and the Possible Legitimation of Philosophy

Abstract: The subject of this article is the problem of the legitimation of philosophy and the importance of philosophy at a modern university. The aim is to understand the place of philosophy at a University determined in terms of various purposes of this institution – on the one hand, the use, effectiveness and efficiency; on the other hand, the search for truth. The first purpose is associated with private interests and the second one is associated with universal values. The researcher has used the methods of problematization and contextualization. A modern problem of the university is the ambiguity of its target orientation. Looking for a solution to the problem requires an appeal to the origin of the classical university and its philosophical basis: Humboldt’s provisions about the university reform and Kant’s justification of the role of the Faculty of Philosophy. The conclusion is that philosophy, following the interests of truth, is uniquely capable and, in fact, should carry out criticism as the definition of the boundaries and conditions of use for any knowledge any regulations. Such analysis allows to describe interaction of private and public interests as the purposes of a University and legitimizes a specific role of philosophy. This is a relevant issue for modern times. 


Keywords:

faculty of philosophy, university, science, education, Wilhelm von Humboldt, Immanuel Kant, autonomy, private interest, modernity, criticism


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Skorkin O.A. Znachimost' gumanitarnoy komponenty obrazovaniya v tekhnicheskikh vuzakh // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 4. - C. 288 - 295. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.4.10807.
2. Adorno T.V. Dlya chego eshche filosofiya // Topos.-2012.-¹ 1.-S. 14-26.
3. Gurevich P.S. Obrazovanie i budushchee cheloveka // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-2.-C. 104-113. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.2.9123.
4. Rozin V.M. Filosofiya upravleniya kak refleksiya nad obshchestvennymi protsessami i prakticheskaya distsiplina // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-8.-C. 53-63.
5. Popkova N.V. Filosofskaya kul'tura ili filosofskaya tekhnologiya? // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 133 - 144. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1956.2015.2.14209.
6. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti // Kant I. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. SPb.: Nauka, 1995. S. 53-120.
7. Veber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya.-M.: Progress, 1990.-C. 707-735.
8. Shnedel'bakh G. Universitet Gumbol'dta // Logos.-2002.-# 5-6. (35.-C.65-78.
9. Kant I. Spor fakul'tetov. Kaliningrad: Izdatel'stvo KGU, 2006.-286 s.
10. Gumbol'dt V. O vnutrenney i vneshney organizatsii vysshikh nauchnykh zavedeniy v Berline // Neprikosnovennyy zapas.-2002.-¹2 (22)-C. 5-10.
11. Nikol'skiy V. Universitetskaya svoboda i akademicheskaya avtonomiya // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii.-2013.-¹ 6.-C. 147-155.
12. Mittel'shtrass Yu. Budushchee nauki i nastoyashchee universiteta // Logos. 2013.-¹1 (91).-C.100-121.
13. Rozin V.M. Stanovlenie novoy obrazovatel'noy formatsii // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2013.-¹ 1.-C.1-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2013.1.6445. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_6445.html.
14. Savvina O.V. Missiya universiteta // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-¹ 2.-C.155-179. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.2.480. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_480.html
15. Andreev A. Yu. Rossiyskie universitety XVIII — pervoy poloviny XIX vekov v kontekste universitetskoy istorii Evropy. M.: Znak, 2009.-640 s.
16. Petrova G.I. Sovremennyy universitet: «mnozhestvennaya identichnost'» ili «ruiny» klassiki? // Vestnik Altayskoy akademii ekonomiki i prava [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://journal-aael.intelbi.ru/main/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/117-120.pdf (data obrashcheniya 30.08.2015).
17. Parkhomenko R.N. Natsional'naya ideya i sovremennost' // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2012.-¹ 1.-C.79-105. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2012.1.135. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_135.html.
18. Liotar Zh.F. Sostoyanie postmoderna. M.: Institut eksperimental'noy sotsiologii; SPb.: Aleteyya, 1998.-160 s.
19. Porter T. M. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.-325 p.
20. Mamardashvili M.K. Sovremennaya evropeyskaya filosofiya XX vek / Logos. 1991. ¹2. C. 109-130.
21. Fuko M. Chto takoe prosveshchenie // Stupeni. Peterburgskiy al'manakh. SPb., 2000.-¹ 1 (11).-C. 136-148.
22. Ridings B. Universitet v ruinakh. M.: Izdatel'skiy dom GU VShE, 2010.-304 s.
23. Ustav SPbGU. [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://spbu.ru/images/ustav/Ustav-2012.pdf. (data obrashcheniya 1.07.2015).
24