Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2071,   Articles in work: 296 Declined articles: 784 

Gurevich P.S. Irresistible Temptations of Lie

Published in journal "Psychology and Psychotechnics", 2015-9 in rubric "Editor-in-Chief's column", pages 865-868.

Resume: The article is devoted to lying as an irresistible human temptation. Immanuel Kant believed deception and misbelief to be doubtlessly evil so he taught us to be honest. The German philosopher also believed that too much lying could destroy the society. However, other philosophers were not so categorical about that issue. For example, Friedrich Nietzsche believed that neither truth nor lie could be the basis for social existence. The author of the present article pays attention to the paradoxical perplexity of deception and truth in individual and social life. In particular, he notes that being raised by illusion, art often reveals the true problems of human existence. In his research Gurevich has used the philosophical anthropology methodology which allows to see contradictory sides of each phenomenon. Starvation for truth and deception is being viewed by the author as the human needs that are difficult to be satisfied. For the first time in the academic literature the author of the article raises a question about consequences of the universal interest for truth and lie and demonstrates how dangerous it is to arrange social life based on illusions and deception. From this point of view, the author conducts a critical analysis of Immanuel Kant's, Friedrich Nietzsche's and Erich Fromm's concepts. Interpreting Freud's theory, American philosophers paid attention only to achieving the truth during psychotherapy but ignored paradoxical aspiration of humans for day-dreaming and delusional or virtual aspects of life.

Keywords: psychology, human, anthropological need, day-dream, illusion, deceit, art, myth, unconscious, honesty

DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.9.16618

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Fromm E. Velichie i ogranichennost' teorii Freyda. M.: AST, 2000. 448 s.
Vret, znachit vzrosleet. Kak raspoznat' detskuyu lozh' i nuzhno li s ney borot'sya. Beseda Iriny Blinnik s L.O. Perezhoginym // Literaturnaya gazeta. 20.08.2015. S. 7.
Kant I. O pedagogike // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8 t. T. 8. M.: Choro, 1994. S. 399-462.
Kant I. O mnimom prave lgat' iz chelovekolyubiya // Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8 t. T. 8. M.: Choro, 1994. S. 256-262.
Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti. Kritika prakticheskogo razuma. Metafizika nravov. SPb.: Nauka, 1995. 528 s.
Nitsshe F. Soch. v 2 t. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990. 829 s.
Gurevich P.S. Kul'turologiya: uchebnoe posobie. M.: Omega-L, 2009. 427 s.
Averintsev S.S. K istolkovaniyu simvoliki mifa ob Edipe // Antichnost' i sovremennost'. M.: Nauka, 1972. S. 90-102.
Andreev D.L. Roza mira: Metafilosofiya istorii. M.: Prometey, 1991. 286 s.
Vitan'i I. Obshchestvo, kul'tura, sotsiologiya. M.: Progress, 1984. 288 s.
Vundt V. Mif i religiya. SPb.: Brokgauz-Efron, 1912. 416 s.
Golosovker Ya.E. Logika mifa. M.: Nauka, 1987. 217 s.
Gurevich P.S. Sotsial'naya mifologiya. M.: Mysl', 1983. 175 s.
Kassirer E. Opyt o cheloveke: Vvedenie v filosofiyu chelovecheskoy kul'tury // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii: Perevody / Sost. i poslesl. P.S. Gurevicha. M.: Progress, 1988. S. 3-30.
Lesli Ien. Prirozhdennye lzhetsy. My ne mozhem zhit' bez obmana. M.: RIPOL klassik, 2012. 352 s.
Nitsshe F. Utrennyaya zarya: Mysli o moral'nykh predrassudkakh. Sverdlovsk: Volya, 1991. 303 s.
O prave lgat' / Sost., red. R.G. Apresyan. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2011. 392 s.
Solov'ev E.Yu. Kategoricheskiy imperativ nravstvennosti prava. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2005. 415 s.
Ellyul' Zhak. Politicheskaya illyuziya. M.: NOTA BENE, 2002. 430 s.
Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. M.: AST: Khranitel', 2006. 761 s

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard