Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2015-10 in rubric "Editor-in-Chief's column", pages 1429-1432.
Resume: The article is devoted to the choice of a global project. Creation of a global civilization was initiated by the European culture. Therefore, there is an opinion that the Euro-Atlantic civilization is dominating in the modern world. This is the civilization which values are widely extended and affect the lifestyle of many peoples. However, there is also a so-called spiritual dispute ongoing between civilizations nowadays. American sociologist Samuel Huntington was the first one to mark out that tendency. Yet, the modern realities go beyond the bounds of Huntington's concept. It now becomes apparent that the Euro-Atlantic civilization is forced to meet the challenges of other civilizations and spiritual traditions. The author of the present article bases his research on the findings of today's comparative philosophy of culture. He has also used the achievements of philosophical anthropology which analyzes world processes from the point of view of human anture. In his article Gurevich has analyzed the global policy trends that appeared after Samuel Huntington's researches had been published. Rapid development of China and India has eventually changed the state of play in the world. Chinese civilization has become capable of running a global project of its own. In this regard, the author of the present article analyzes resources and claims of major civilizations for global leadership. The novelty of the author's approach to the problem is caused by the statement that none of modern civilization can actually prove their global projects to be immutable and universal.
Keywords: culture, civilization, globalism, spiritual dispute of civilizations, global leadership, global projects, dewesternization, nationalism, rationality, sanity
Global'nye problemy i obshchechelovecheskie tsennosti: sbornik / Per. s angl. i fr. Sost. L.I. Vasilenko, V.E. Ermolaeva; Vvod. st. Yu.A. Shreydera. M.: Progress, 1990. 495 s.
Mezhuev V.M. Gumanizm i sovremennaya tsivilizatsiya // Mesto i rol' gumanizma v budushchey tsivilizatsii / Otv. red. G.L. Belkina. M.: Lenand, 2014. S. 35-57.
«Tsivilizatsionnaya model'» mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy i ee implikatsii (Nauchnaya diskussiya v redaktsii «Polisa») // Polis. 1995. ¹ 1. S. 33-57.
Popov Gavriil. Kitayskiy natsionalizm i kitayskie reformy // Moskovskiy komsomolets. ¹ 26900 ot 1 sentyabrya 2015 g.
Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy. M.: AST: Astrel', 2011. 571 s.
Zhizhek Slavoy. Shchekotlivyy sub'ekt: otsutstvuyushchiy tsentr politicheskoy ontologii / Per. s angl. S. Shchukinoy. M.: Izd. dom «Delo» RANKhiGS, 2014. 528 s.
Danilevskiy N.A. Rossiya i Evropa: vzglyad na kul'turnye i politicheskie otnosheniya Slavyanskogo mira k germano-romanskomu. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. 663 s.
Toynbi A.Dzh. Postizhenie istorii / Per. s angl. E.D. Zharkova. M.: Ayris-press, 2010. 637 s
Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard