Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Nasonov S.A. Continental model of jury trial proceedings: genesis and particularities of the procedure

Abstract: This article examines the genesis and evolution of the continental model of jury trial proceedings. The first historical form of continental model of jury trial emerged at the end of the XVIII century in France, after which it spread throughout virtually all of Europe in the XIX century. The work reveals the particularities of the continental model emerging throughout the stages of court trials and arguments; in the system of questions faced by the jury; jury verdicts. The author notes that the subject of court trial and arguments in the continental model were extremely broad; information about the identity of the defendant was examined with participation of the jury. The continental model of jury trial had an unbalanced defense and prosecution bases: the prosecutor possessed significantly greater rights that the defense, while the court had discretional authority in the area of evidence. At the same time, the jurors had a broad arsenal of rights in the criminal procedure and were allowed to take the evidence into the deliberation room. The author makes a conclusion that the research of the historical experience of the continental model of the court proceedings involving jury is important for the search of ways to improve this form of procedure in modern Russia.


Keywords:

verdict, jurors, pleadings, judicial enquiry, continental model, jury trial, question list, competitiveness, questioning, witness


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva Frantsii. Perev. N. Neklyudova. – SPb, 1860 g.
2. Foynitskiy I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: V 2 t. Pereizd. SPb.: Al'fa, 1996. T. 2.
3. Rozin N.N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. SPb. 1914.
4. Sluchevskiy V.K. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Sudoustroystvo — sudoproizvodstvo. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb., 1913.
5. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva dlya Germanskoy imperii s zakonom o vvedenii ego v deystvie 1 fevralya 1877 goda. Perev. Iv. Soboleva. SPb., 1878.
6. Radutnaya N.V. Sud prisyazhnykh v kontinental'noy sisteme prava // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 1995. ¹ 1.
7. Nasonov S.A. Evropeyskie modeli proizvodstva v sude prisyazhnykh: sud prisyazhnykh v Ispanii (sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie). Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. ¹ 8.
8. Mikhaylov P.L. Sud prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii. SPb.: Izd-vo R. Aslanova, 2004.
9. Mittermayer K.Zh.A. Evropeyskie i amerikanskie sudy prisyazhnykh, ikh deyatel'nost', dostoinstva, nedostatki i sredstva k ustraneniyu etikh nedostatkov. Vyp. 1–2. M.: D. Dril', 1869–1871.
10. Zakrevskiy I.P. O nastoyashchem i budushchem suda prisyazhnykh. Sbornik statey. – SPb.: Tip. I.P. Soykina, 1897.
11. Dudko N.A. Sud prisyazhnykh po UPK Ukrainy // Ugolovno-protsessual'nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya na Altae: materialy ezhegodnoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 50-letiyu yuridicheskogo fakul'teta i 40-letiyu Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – Barnaul. 2012, Vyp.11–12.
12. Brauer E. Sud prisyazhnykh po zakonodatel'stvam Germanii: Obshchiy obzor i polozhenie nemetskikh zakonodatel'stv po etomu predmetu, s kratkim ukazaniem na zakonodatel'stva drugikh gosudarstv, preimushchestvenno na frantsuzskoe, shotlandskoe i severo-amerikanskoe /Per., prim.: V. Bartenev. SPb.: Zhurn. M-va yust., 1865.
13. Chel'tsov-Bebutov M.A. Kurs ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava. SPb.: Al'fa, 1995.
14. Yanevich-Yanevskiy P. O vvedenii, razvitii i sovremennom sostoyanii suda prisyazhnykh vo Frantsii // Yuridicheskie zapiski. T. 3. 1859.
15. Gleadow Carmen. History of trial by jury in the Spanish legal system.– Lewiston. NY.2000