Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Malkina S.M. From Archi-Metaphysics to Postmetaphysics: the Metaphysics and the Problem of Power

Abstract: The discourse on overcoming metaphysics is a special philosophical genre that has been popular over the past two centuries. Besides, each time there is a shift in the interpretation of the metaphysical that raises the question about what metaphysics is and whether it exists at all. Badiou makes a supposition that the reasons for the resumption of attempts to overcome metaphysics lie in the fact that metaphysics by definition is the reign of the essentially undetermined. This allows to consider the question of metaphysics from the standpoint of the problem of power. The article focuses on the analysis of the rhetoric on overcoming metaphysics as a philosophical genre and Heidegger’s idea of metaphysics as the will to power which allows to analyze this rhetoric as a struggle for power. The author of the article concludes that it is necessary to distinguish between the forms of critical attitude to metaphysics. Antimetaphysical philosophy (that is aimed at overcoming and rejection of metaphysics) does not only have the metaphysical nature itself but is archi-metaphysics. It struggles with uncertainty and meaninglessness in metaphysics trying to establish a new will to power. Postmetaphysical philosophy does not seek to establish the will to power of a philosophizing subject by replacing the “senselessness” of metaphysics with a particular philosophical “meaning” but transforms the entire field of philosophy in such way that power relations no longer play a significant role.

Keywords:

critical philosophy, philosophy of the subject, Heidegger, postmetaphysical philosophy, Badiou, antimetaphysical philosophy, overcoming metaphysics, power, metaphysics, will to power

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bad'yu A. Manifest filosofii. SPb.: Machina, 2003. 184 s.
2. Derrida Zh. Disseminatsiya. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, 2007. 608 s.
3. Derrida Zh. Pozitsii. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2007. 160 s.
4. Foucault M. L’Ordre du discours. P.: Gallimard, 1971. 88 p.
5. Bad'yu A. Tela, yazyki, istiny // Skepsis. Nauchno-prosvetitel'skii zhurnal [elektronnyi resurs]. 8 maya 2008. URL: http://scepsis.net/library/id_1974.html (data obrashcheniya: 30.07.2015).
6. Badiou A. Being and Event. N.Y., L.: Continuum, 2005. xxxiii, 526 p.
7. Derrida Zh. Struktura, znak i igra v diskurse gumanitarnykh nauk // Derrida Zh. Pis'mo i razlichie. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2000. S. 445-466.
8. Habermas J. Postmethaphysical thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992. 241 p.
9. Nitsshe F. Veselaya nauka // Nitsshe F. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: V 13 tt. T. 3. M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2014. S. 313-596.
10. Delez Zh., Gvattari F. Chto takoe filosofiya? M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2009. 261 s.
11. Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2008. 416 s.
12. Levinas E. Izbrannoe. Total'nost' i beskonechnoe. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 2000. 416 s.
13. Khaidegger M. Nitsshe. V 2-kh tt. T. 2. SPb.: «Vladimir Dal'», 2007. 458 s.
14. Derrida Zh. Polya filosofii. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2012. 376 s.
15. Comte A. Physique Sociale. Cours de Philosophie Positive, Leçons 46 à 60. P.: Hermann, 1975. 791 p.
16. Badiou A. Metaphysics and the Critique of Metaphysics // Pli. 2000. ¹
17. P. 174-190. 10. Kant I. Prolegomeny ko vsyakoi budushchei metafizike, kotoraya mozhet poyavit'sya kak nauka // Kant I. Sochineniya v 8-mi tt. T. 4. M.: Choro, 1994. S. 5-152.
18. Derrida Zh. Prizraki Marksa. Gosudarstvo dolga, rabota skorbi i novyi internatsional. M.: Logos-altera, izdatel'stvo «Ecce homo», 2006. 256 s.
19. Borisov E., Inishev I., Furs V. Prakticheskii povorot v postmetafizicheskoi filosofii. T. 1. Vil'nyus: EGU, 2008. 212 s.
20. Benua Zh. Preodoleniya metafiziki // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik’2010. M.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2011. S. 205-222.
21. Malkina S.M. Problema kontsa filosofii: hanto-logicheskie aspekty // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. 2011. T. 11. Ser.: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, vyp. 2. S. 52-57.
22. Mokin B. I. Sovremennaya filosofiya: «zakat» ili razvitie? // Izv. Sarat. un-ta. Novaya ser. 2010. T. 10. Ser. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, vyp. 2. S. 29−33.
23. Bogatov M.A. O ritorike krizisa v dele filosofii // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. 2011. T. 11. Ser.: Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, vyp. 2. S. 46-52.
24. Kosykhin V.G. Terminologiya razryva: Khaidegger i vopros ob istorichnosti istiny v metafizike // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. Tambov, 2008. Vypusk 10(66). S. 130-135.
25. Gegel' G.V.F. Nauka logiki. SPb.: Nauka, 2002. 800 s.
26. Delez Zh. Peregovory. 1972 – 1990. SPb.: «Nauka», 2004. 234 s.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.