Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Danilova N.V. The Right to a Favourable Environment: Subjective Right or Legitimate Interest?

Abstract: The subject of the study are the problems of legal regulation and protection of the human right to a favourable environment. The article considers different aspects which allow to define the right to a favourable environment either as a main human right or as an interest protected by the law. In particular, the author refers to the question of whether it is possible to contest the decisions of the authorities that violate the right to a favourable environment. The article considers the position of the right to a favourable environment in the hierarchy of ecological and legal norms. The author points out considerable gaps in the existing environmental legislation, which does not contain a clear description of the content of this right, or any ways to protect it. The study used both general and particular methods of scientific knowledge: dialectical, formal-logical, formal and legal, comparative legal. The analysis of the content of the right to a favourable environment allows to draw the conclusion that in positive law it has a form not of a subjective right, but the one of a legally protected interest. The author draws attention to the necessity to improve the methods of legal protection of this right, as well as to enlist various authorities to participate in this process.


Keywords:

environmental interest, human rights, ways of protection, right to protection, legitimate interest, subjective right, favourable environment, environment, environmental law, judicial protection


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Karasev R.E. Sudebnaya zashchita: ponyatie, znachenie, mesto v sisteme zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1511 - 1519. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10147.
2. Vasil'eva M.I. Problemy zashchity obshchestvennogo interesa v ekologicheskom prave // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. ¹ 8. S. 49-62.
3. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Publichnoe pravo. Uchebnik. – M.: Izdatel'stvo BEK. 1995. – 339 s.
4. Mal'ko A.V. Osnovy teorii zakonnykh interesov // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1999. ¹ 5-6. S. 65-72.
5. Klyaus N.V. Soderzhanie zakonnogo interesa // Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa. Sb. st. / Pod red. A.V. Tsikhotskogo – Novosibirsk: Institut filosofii i prava SO RAN, 2004. S. 107-117.
6. Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. – M.: Statut. 2001. – 411 s.
7. Krasavchikova O.L. Pravo na blagopriyatnuyu okruzhayushchuyu sredu (grazhdansko-pravovoy aspekt) // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 1993. ¹ 2. S. 42-46.
8. Chechot D.M. Sub'ektivnoe pravo i formy ego zashchity. – L.: Izd-vo LGU, 1968. 71 s.
9. Anisimov A.P., Ryzhenkov A.Ya., Chernomorets A.E. Ekologicheskoe pravo Rossii: Uchebnik dlya vuzov / Pod red. A.P. Anisimova. – Volgograd: Izdatel'stvo «Al'yans». 440 s.
10. S. 38-44. 7.Shcherbich L.A. Obespechenie konstitutsionnogo prava grazhdanina na blagopriyatnuyu ekologicheskuyu sredu // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2009. ¹ 1. S. 15-18.
11. Abanina E.N. Zashchita prava grazhdan na blagopriyatnuyu okruzhayushchuyu sredu pri obrashchenii prokurora v sud: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Sovremennoe pravo. 2014. ¹
12. Shemshuchenko Yu.S. Pravovye problemy ekologii. – Kiev, 1989. 231 s.
13. Brinchuk M.M. Blagopriyatnaya okruzhayushchaya sreda-vazhneyshaya kategoriya prava // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. ¹ 9. S. 37-52.
14. Vasil'eva M.I. Publichnye interesy v ekologicheskom prave. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 2003. – 424 s.
15. Vasil'eva M.I. Pravo na blagopriyatnuyu okruzhayushchuyu sredu kak element pravovogo statusa lichnosti // Ekologicheskoe pravo. 2005. N 1. S. 19-26.
16. Dubovik O.L. Ekologicheskoe pravo: Uchebnik. –M.: Prospekt, 2010. 719 s.