Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Popov E.A. Culture-Centrism as a Direction of Social Security Analysis in Modern Scientific Discourse

Abstract: The subject of the research is social security. The handlings of this phenomenon mainly concern the mechanisms of provision of this sort of security by the state. Modern social and humanitarian science often understands social security as a condition of the society when various social, political and economic threats are overcome, and thus, society, individuals and state cooperate harmoniously. In the meantime, social security should also be considered in its sociocultural aspect. This is what the present article focuses on. The main methodological point of view of the considered topic is sociocultural approach which allows to study social security as a part of a system of values and norms. The main conclusions of the conducted research are as follows: 1) social security should be considered not only from the point of view of sociocentrism (as a phenomenon that provides social stability), but also from the point of view of sociocultural approach (as a phenomenon that contributes to the full-fledged interaction of society, individuals, state and culture); 2) culture-centric vector of study of social security in modern science allows to disclose value and norm "potential" of the present subject of study. 


Keywords:

security, social security, cognition, norms, values, sociology, society, culture, science, sociocultural aspect


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shul'ts V.L., Kul'ba V.V., Shelkov A.B., Chernov I.V. Stsenarnyy analiz effektivnosti upravleniya regional'noy bezopasnost'yu // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 2. - C. 188 - 206. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.2.11319.
2. Kamilov M.A. Opredelenie obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti v sootvetstvii s novoy Kontseptsiey obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 8. - C. 775 - 778. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.8.12403.
3. I. V. Pogodina, D. Yu. Fraymovich Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost' regionov
4. (dinamicheskiy analiz retrospektivy
5. pokazateley VRP) // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 1. - C. 60 - 63.
6. I. V. Pogodina, Z. V. Mishchenko, D. Yu. Fraymovich Mnogourovnevyy podkhod k opredeleniyu
7. optimal'nykh indikatorov regional'noy
8. bezopasnosti na osnove
9. ekonomiko-matematicheskogo modelirovaniya // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2012. - 2. - C. 124 - 130.
10. Noyanzina O.E., Maksimova S.G., Avdeeva G.S., Omel'chenko D.A., Goncharova N.P. Etnicheskaya i grazhdanskaya identichnost' naseleniya sovremennogo regiona Rossii // Vestnik Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2015. ¹ 6 (128).
11. Gromov M.N. Vechnye tsennosti russkoy kul'tury: k interpretatsii otechestvennoy filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. ¹ 1. S. 54-61.
12. Vedernikova O.N. Antikorruptsionnaya politika v Rossii: s chego nachat'? // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2005. ¹ 3.
13. Trunov I.L. Antikorruptsionnaya politika v Rossii // Pravo i politika. 2006. ¹ 11.
14. Neretina S.S. Sotsiokod filosofii (o filosofskikh rabotakh M.K. Petrova) // Voprosy filosofii. 2008. ¹ 10.
15. Andreev A.L. Russkaya mechta: vzglyad sotsiologa // Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. Al'manakh 2013 // OAO «VTsIOM». M., 2013.
16. Burd'e P. Nachala / per. s fr. M.: Socio-Logos, 1994.
17. Panishchev A.A. Problema destruktsii gosudarstvennosti. Praydovoe pravo zhivotnogo mira i zakon chelovecheskogo obshchestva // Voprosy kul'turologii. 2010. ¹ 1. S. 50-55.
18. Dines V., Fedotov A. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost' v kontekste modernizatsii // Vlast'. 2010. ¹ 1. S. 9-14.