Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1926,   Articles in work: 332 Declined articles: 648 
Library

Baranov M.S. Correlation of the notions “suffered”, “aggrieved person” and “victim of crime”

Published in journal "Administrative and municipal law", 2015-9 in rubric "Administrative law, municipal law and other branches of law", pages 963-966.

Resume: The subject of the research is the range of legal and organizational problems of consideration of the notion of a person, suffered from some damage, and its legitimation according to the current criminal and penal legislation. The author carries out theoretical and legal analysis of the notions “suffered”, “aggrieved person” and “victim of crime”. The article demonstrates the author’s positions on the interpretation and legal regulation of these categories. The main attention is paid to the development of the classification criteria for the abovementioned legal categories in the science and law-enforcement practice. The methodology includes the recent achievements of epistemology. The author applies the general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the systems method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional legal methods (formal-logical) and the methods of special sociological research (the statistical methods, expert assessments, etc.). The author concludes that the notions “suffered”, “aggrieved person” and “victim of crime” are not revealed in the current legislation consistently enough. Therefore, it is necessary to develop criminal and administrative legislation regarding legitimation of these categories. The author draws attention to this problem and offers the ways of differentiation of these categories in the Russian law. 

Keywords: regulation, offence, infringement, delict, police, victim, crime, suffered, correlation, notion

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.9.15017

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Kak gotovit' zakon (nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie) / Yu.A. Tikhomirov, A.S. Pigolkin, T.N. Rakhmanina. M., 1993.
Krasikov A.N. Sushchnost' i znachenie soglasiya poterpevshego v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. Saratov, 1976. S. 44.
Kriminologiya: Slovar'-spravochnik. M., 1989.
Sidorenko E.L. O statuse poterpevshego v ugolovnom prave. // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava . ¹4. 2011.
Sidorov B.V. Poterpevshiy v sisteme elementov sostava prestupleniya // Uchen. zap. KGU. 1996, T. 132.
Sumachev A.V. Poterpevshiy v ugolovnom prave (analiz osnovnykh problem): monografiya. Nizhnevartovsk: Filial YuUrGU v g. Nizhnevartovske, 2005. S. 48.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. Pravovoe regulirovanie deyatel'nosti politsii po profilaktiki pravonarusheniy v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2015. - 1. - C. 24 - 34. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2015.1.14255.
Kurakin A.V., Kostennikov M.V., Myshlyaev N.P. K voprosu o prichinakh i usloviyakh administrativnoy deliktnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 2. - C. 152 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.2.14281.
Trunov I.L. Problemy bezopasnosti
dorozhnogo dvizheniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 8. - C. 797 - 801. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.8.9369.
Doroshenko O.M. Administrativno-
pravovoe regulirovanie
deyatel'nosti politsii
po protivodeystviyu pravonarusheniyam
nesovershennoletnikh // Politseyskaya deyatel'nost'. - 2013. - 4. - C. 254 - 262. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.4.9440.
Kazak B.B., Mikhaylova N.V., Stolyarenko V.M. Ob organizatsii profilaktiki pravonarusheniy organami
vnutrennikh del // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2012. - 2. - C. 39 - 42.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard