'Management category in the context of the problem of developing a scientific definition of public domain' Law and Politics nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Borodach M.V. Management category in the context of the problem of developing a scientific definition of public domain

Published in journal "Law and Politics", 2015-9 in rubric "Authority and management", pages 1265-1274.

Resume: In this work an attempt is made to formulate a substantiated approach towards development of a scientific definition of public domain of the basis of management category. The author conducts a critical analysis of the existing concepts that elaborate the content of public domain, and makes a conclusion on the impossibility of applying the classic triad of property rights (right to own, use, and manage) to solve this task. This work proposes to view the management category as the conceptual center of the perceptions of public domain, but without acknowledgement of any type of rights of ownership behind it. The author defends the position according to which the management pertaining to the area of public domain must be perceived within the ontological framework of the phenomenon described using this category, without any kind of speculative limitations justified by the tasks and peculiarities of jurisprudence. From these positions the author substantiates the conclusion that management of objects of public domain within a strict sense of this notion can lie only in the plane of the fact, and not the right. On the contrary, the notion of management in its broad sense, as an activity process that is intended to influence the behavior of people in the sphere of public domain, corresponds with the constitutional legal nature of the phenomenon of public domain and is sufficient enough to reveal the entire multifacetedness of its practical manifestations within juridical practice, and moreover, outside the framework of the traditional triad of property rights.

Keywords: triad of proprietary rights, definition, public authority, public domain, public interests, impact, management, public proprietor, legal being, legal relations

DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.9.15345

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Federal'nyy zakon ot 08.11.2007 261-FZ (s izm. i dop.) O morskikh portakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i o vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii, st. 30 // SZ RF. 2007. 46. St. 5557.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 06.10.1999 184-FZ (s izm. i dop.) Ob obshchikh printsipakh organizatsii zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) i ispolnitel'nykh organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii, st. 26.12 // SZ RF. 1999. 42. St. 5005.
Sklovskiy K. I. Sobstvennost' v grazhdanskom prave: Ucheb.-prakt. posobie. 3-e izd. M.: Delo, 2002. 510 s.
P'yanykh E. S. Mesto dogovora doveritel'nogo upravleniya imushchestvom v sisteme grazhdansko-pravovykh obyazatel'stv // Yurist. 2004. 12. S. 24 27.
Pravo sobstvennosti v SSSR / Pod red. Yu. K. Tolstogo, V. F. Yakovleva. M., 1989. 287 s.
Pokrovskiy I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. SPb., 1998. 560 s.
Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 09.03.2004 314 (s izm. i dop.) O sisteme i strukture federal'nykh organov ispolnitel'noy vlasti, podp. g p. 2 // SZ RF. 2004. 11. St. 945;
Mozolin V. P. Sovremennaya doktrina i grazhdanskoe zakonodatel'stvo. M.: Yustitsinform, 2008. 176 s.
Mogilevskiy S. D. Organy upravleniya khozyaystvennymi obshchestvami. Pravovoy aspekt: Monografiya.-M.: Delo, 2001.-360 c.
Kosyakin K. S. Sub'ektivnoe pravo yuridicheskogo litsa na upravlenie vnutrennimi delami: disskand.yurid.nauk. M.: MGYuA, 2008. 237 s.
Korkunov N. M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava. M.: ROSSPEN, 2010. 520 s.
Ermakov V. S. Kontseptsiya postroeniya pravovoy sistemy upravleniya obshchim imushchestvom kondominiuma (mnogokvartirnogo doma) // Zhilishchnoe pravo. 2004. 2. S. 72 87.
Gligich-Zolotareva M. V. Teoriya i praktika gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Pravo i politika. 2007. 4.-S. 144-147.
Danilenko D. V. Osnovnye napravleniya evolyutsii sovremennogo konstitutsionalizma // Pravo i politika. 2009. 9.-S. 1920-1928.
Vinnitskiy A. V. Publichnaya sobstvennost'.-M.: Statut, 2013.-732 s.
Vinnitskiy A. V. Upravlenie gosudarstvennoy sobstvennost'yu na sovremennom etape: voprosy doktriny i zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i politika. 2010. 11.-S. 1909-1918.
Venediktov A. V. Gosudarstvennaya sotsialisticheskaya sobstvennost'. M.; L., 1948. 839 s.
Bondar' N. S., Zinchenko S. A. Gorodskoy sovet i administratsiya: problemy razgranicheniya polnomochiy v sfere munitsipal'noy sobstvennosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1993. 3.-S. 86-96.
Berg A. I. Kibernetika nauka ob optimal'nom upravlenii. M., 1964. 64 s.
Bertalanfi L. fon. Obshchaya teoriya sistem obzor problem i rezul'tatov // Sistemnye issledovaniya: ezhegodnik, 1969 god. M., 1969. S. 23 65.
Atamanchuk G. V. Teoriya gosudarstvennogo upravleniya: Kurs lektsiy. 3-e izd., dop. M.: Izd-vo OMEGA-L, 2005.-584 s.
Annenkov K. Sistema russkago grazhdanskago prava. T.2. 2-e izd., peresmotr. i dop.: Reprintnoe izdanie. SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1900. 703 s.
Akopyan D. A., Elyakov A. D. Priroda upravleniya // Aktual'nye voprosy pravovedeniya. 2003. 3.-S. 258-262.
Kharitonova Yu. S. Upravlenie v grazhdanskom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: Norma: INFRA-M, 2011. 304 c.
Kharlamov A. S. Rol' grazhdanskogo prava v regulirovanii otnosheniy upravleniya imushchestvom publichnogo sobstvennika // Pravo i politika. 2007. 10.-S. 37-46.
Chebotarev G. N. Printsip razdeleniya vlastey v gosudarstvennom ustroystve Rossiyskoy Federatsii.-Tyumen', 1997.-218 s.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard