Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Doronina N.G. Specific Features of Regulating of Economic Integration in Latin American Countries

Abstract: The article contains the analysis of the main sources of legal documents concerning integration in Latin America. Special attention is devoted to the economic integration, the example of which is Andean Common Market. The analysis of the legal basis of economic integration shows the connection between economic integration of the last decades of the 20th century and the movement to the Confederation of the States in South America under the direction of Simon Bolivar. The legal récipé of the integration in the nineteenth century became a tradition in the “American international law”. The analysis of the Montevideo and Pan American Conventions helps to explain the important Role of the legal doctrine in Latin American process of integration. The specifics of the integration process in Latin America is in its basis – strengthening process of the unification of Law. The modern technique and the forms of legal integration in Latin America are partly taken from European integration. Then enriched with the local concepts and doctrine and are aimed to resolve the inner problems of the region. The character of economic integration in Latin America exposes the enforcement of support of national business activity, the economic role of State sector in the Economy, and the development of the cooperation in the region in the form of multinational enterprises. These characters are developing greatly due to the concept that national law is the basis of regulation of the relationships with the foreigners’ participation. The example of such nationalistic concepts is the Calvo doctrine, which appeared in nineteenth century and continues to influence the investment policy of Latin American countries up till now. Calvo doctrine plays an important role in economic integration, which is the continuation of the integration movement following the fight for the independence against colonial power of European countries and for the defense of national interests, that are now also actual. The Calvo doctrine, deactivated in 90-ies, is now revived. The revival of Calvo doctrine does not object the economic integration in Latin America because the concept of unification of law in the integrated States is based on the division of jurisdiction in the international document. That means the broad range of legal methods and instruments that each integrating State may use in economic regulation. There are different examples, shown in the article, how the rules of international treaties on jurisdiction help to coordinate policies and integrate the States in their efforts to achieve economic goals and defend sovereignty. The analysis of International Treaties of the First South American Congress and of the Decisions of the Commission of Carthagena Agreement of the ANCOM countries had a great influence on local foreign investment regulation due to the basic concept of Calvo doctrine. It resulted in the principles of capital regulation and stability of integration process. The investment policy makes the foundation of economic integration. The compromise reached in international documents allows the integrated States to address the international mechanisms to resolve investment disputes. At the same time the traditional approach to the problems of jurisdiction makes it possible for the States participating in the integration process to use different instruments to defend their interests and simultaneously to search the best rules and practices to regulate business relations.


Keywords:

Montevideo Treaties, Pan American conventions, Inter-American Conference on private international law, unification of law, Common Regime of foreign investments of Andean Common Market (ANCOM), Calvo doctrine, Decisions of the Commission of the Cartagena Agreement, Common Regime of legal regulation of foreign investments, unification of law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Doronina N.G. Aktual'nye problemy investitsionnogo zakonodatel'stva // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'-stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 58-69.
2. Doronina N.G. Inostrannye investitsii i sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo // Pravovye problemy inostran-nykh investitsiy v SSSR. Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. M., 1991.
3. Doronina N.G. Unifikatsiya i garmonizatsiya v sfere pravovogo regulirovaniya inostrannykh investitsiy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2005. ¹ 1. S. 51-62.
4. Doronina N.G. Unifikatsiya prava stran Latinskoy Ameriki. Obzornaya informatsiya. (Chast' I i II). Vypusk 9. Insti-tut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
5. Doronina N.G., Semilyutina N.G. Obzor raboty XIX Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa sravnitel'nogo prava (Vena, 20-26 iyulya 2014 g.) // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 916-933.
6. Lebedev S. H. Mezhdunarodnyy arbitrazh i problema zashchity inostrannykh investitsiy (Vashingtonskaya konven-tsiya). Pravovye problemy inostrannykh investitsiy v SSSR. Nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya. M., 1991.
7. Lunts L. A. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Osobennaya chast'. M., 1975.
8. Lunts L. A., Marysheva I. I. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Mezhdunarodnyy grazhdanskiy protsess. M., 1976.
9. Rafalyuk E.E. Regional'naya integratsiya latinoamerikanskikh gosudarstv. Priroda, soderzhanie razreshenie spo-rov. Monografiya. Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Fe-deratsii. M.: Infra-M. 2014.
10. Unifikatsiya prava stran Latinskoy Ameriki (chast' 1 i 2) Moskva. Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Verkhovnom Sovete Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 1991.
11. A. Alvarez. Le Droit international americain. P. 1910. P.307.
12. Esquirol J. L. Foreign Investment: Revision of The Andean Foreign Investment Code. – Harvard International Law Journal Vol. 29, n. 1, 1988, p. 169
13. G. Parra-Aranguren. Recent Developments of Conflict of Laws Conventions in Latin America // Recueil des Cours. 1979-III, t. 164. 1980
14. Griffith Dawson F. International Law and the Procedural Rights of Aliens Before National Tribunals.– The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. Vol. 17, 1968, n. 2, p. 405
15. International Legal Materials. Vol. 20, 1981, p. 672.
16. M. A. D’Estefano Pisani. Historia del derecho internacional desde antiguedad hastsa 1917. Habana. 1985. P.64.
17. Nolde B. La codification du droit prive –Recneil des conrs, 1936-i, t 55. Paris, 1936, p. 359
18. Parra-Aranguren P. Codificacion del dereeho international pri-vado en America Latina. Caracas, 1982, p. 367
19. Redefining Sovereignty in International Economic Law. Ed. By Wenhua Shan, Penelope Simons and Dalvinder Singh. Hart Publishing. Oxford and Portland, Oregon. 2008. P.XLV. Introduction,
20. Sutherland P. F. The World Bank Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. V. 28, 1979, n. 3, p. 367.
21. Villela A.M. L’unification du droit international privé en Amerique Latine // Revue critique du droit international privé 1984 Tome73 N.2 P.233
22. Vitta E. International Conventions and National Conflict Sy-stems–Recueil des cours, 1969, t. 126, 1987, p. 189
23. W. Goldschmidt. Sumo del derecho internacional privado. Buenos Aires. 1958. P.5