Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Balakleets N.A. Gestalt of the Partisan as a Transgressive Phenomenon: Carl Schmitt’s Political and Philosophical Theory of the Partisan

Abstract: The subject of the present study is the phenomenon of the partisan presented in Carl Schmitt’s “Theory of the Partisan”. The gestalt of the partisan is analysed in the context of the ideas of E. Junger, G. Münkler, I. Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, G. Bataille, F. Nietzsche, W. Sombart and others. The follow ing major social and political characteristics of the partisan are disclosed: irregularity, political engagement, increased mobility, telluric character. The author explicates the heuristic potential of C. Schmitt’s concept of the Partisan in conditions of depoliticisation of modern society, erasing borders between the conditions of war and peace, levelling the differences between regular and irregular armed groups. Along with the general scientific research methodology the author uses systems and anthropological approaches to the analysis of political phenomena, as well as the principle of methodological holism.The scientific novelty of the research lies in the interpretation of the Gestalt of the Partisan as a transgressive element of social space that exists in the semantic field between the poles of “combatant” and “terrorist”, but does not merge completely with any of them. In the author's interpretation the Gestalt of the Partisan is treated as anti-discourse element of social space, an element of resistance to the dominant discourse of power, therefore, it represents the greatest threat to the unifying power mechanisms in the globalised world.


Keywords:

justus hostis, combatant, war, state, transgression, space, Gestalt, partisan, power, Carl Schmitt


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shmitt K. Teoriya partizana. – M.: Praksis, 2007. – 301 s.
2. Schroers, R. Der Partisan. Ein Beitrag zur politischen Anthropologie. Köln, Berlin: Kiepenheuer & Witsch, 1961. – 344 S.
3. Yunger E. Ukhod v les. URL: http://www.fatuma.net/text/yunger-uhod-v-les.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 1.06.2015).
4. Münkler, H. Der Partisan: Theorie, Strategie, Gestalt. – Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990. – 391 S.
5. Yunger E. Rabochiy. Gospodstvo i geshtal't; Total'naya mobilizatsiya; O boli. – SPb.: Nauka, 2000. – 539 s.
6. Sloterdayk P., Khaynriks G.-Yu. Solntse i smert': Dialogicheskie issledovaniya. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Ivana Limbakha, 2015. – 608 s.
7. Shmitt K. Nomos Zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum. – SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2008. – 670 s.
8. Balakleets N.A. Telo i vlast' v kontseptsii organoproektsii E. Kappa // Vestnik Ul'yanovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. – 2015. – ¹ 1 (69). – S. 20-24.
9. Gegel' G.V.F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. Filosofiya dukha. – M.: Mysl', 1977. – 472 s.
10. Zombart V. Sobranie sochineniy v 3 t. T. 2. – SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2005. – 654 s.
11. Horn E. “Waldganger”, Traitor, Partisan: Figures of Political Irregularity in West German Postwar Thought // CR: The New Centennial Review. Volume 4, Number 3, Winter 2004, pp. 125-143.
12. Balakleets N.A. Topologiya riska: rossiyskiy sotsiokul'turnyy kontekst // Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional'naya kul'tura. – 2009. – 4 (20). – S. 136-140.
13. Batay Zh. «Próklyataya chast'»: Sakral'naya sotsiologiya. – M.: Ladomir, 2006. – 742 s.
14. Schölzer, H. Guerillakommunikation: Genealogie einer politischen Konfliktform. – Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2013. – 372 S.
15. Münkler, H. Die Strategie des Terrorismus und die Abwehrmöglichkeiten des demokratischen Rechtsstaats URL: http://edoc.bbaw.de/volltexte/2009/1214/pdf/II_01_Muenkler.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 1.06.2015).
16. Mrozek G. Militärkolonne geriet in einen Hinterhalt tschetschenischer Kämpfer / Tschetschenen verkünden Beginn des Guerillakrieges // Berliner Zeitung, 04.03.2000.
17. Kant I. K vechnomu miru // Traktaty o vechnom mire. – SPb.: Aleteyya, 2003. – S. 205-241.
18. Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral'noe. M.: OGI, 2003. – 296 s.
19. Gobbs T. Leviafan. – M.: Mysl', 2001. – 478 s.
20. Nitsshe F. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy: V 13 tomakh. T. 2: Chelovecheskoe, slishkom chelovecheskoe. – M.: Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya, 2011. – 672 s.
21. Shmitt K. Ponyatie politicheskogo URL: http://kyrychok.inf.ua/files/Resources/Smitt_Politics.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 1.06.2015).
22. R.N. Parkhomenko Dikhotomiya politicheskogo
23. K. Shmitta // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 4. - C. 380 - 389. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.9.