'The 2014 Crimea crisis and the construction of a new architecture of international relations' Conflict Studies / nota bene nbpublish.com
Eng
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Bunevich D.S. The 2014 Crimea crisis and the construction of a new architecture of international relations

Published in journal "Conflict Studies / nota bene", 2015-2 in rubric "Topical issues and vectors for modern conflict resolution studies development", pages 133-139.

Resume: The article investigates the process of the erosion of Yalta-Potsdam system of international relations of the post-Cold War era. The world community was in accordance with the fact that Washington has played the leading role in all matters relating to international security. Aggressive US foreign policy in the Balkans and the Middle East led to a significant weakening of international institutions and the erosion of the principles of international law. Destructive role of the United States as the sole superpower became more and more apparent over time. The methodological basis of the study constitute a systemic, structural-functional, comparative-historical, comparative political, geopolitical, cultural and civilizational approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, modeling, observation.It is concluded that the Crimean crisis has shown the need for new rules of international coexistence. In Crimea, Russia challenged the existing world order, which is based on US hegemony. And Russia, despite the sanctions deployed against it, did not find itself in diplomatic isolation. If Russia successfully overcomes the political and economic pressure from the US and its allies, and mobilizes and structures the growing global discontent with the American hegemony, then the world would be facing a fundamentally new outlook. The author predicts that the new (Crimean) the system of international relations will follow the principles of the Vienna system.

Keywords: diplomacy, conflicts, Crimea, Russia, forin policy, international relations, state, interests, values, security

DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.2.14333

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Webe S. International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. London, 2005.
Tetcher M. Iskusstvo upravleniya gosudarstvom: strategii dlya menyayushchegosya mira. M., 2012. S. 34.
Chernyaev A.S. GorbachevBush: vstrecha na Mal'te v 1989 godu [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy: http://www.gorby.ru/presscenter/publication/show_152/
Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. New York, 1992.
Toffler O. O smeshchenii vlasti: znanie, bogatstvo i prinuzhdenie na poroge 21 veka. M., 1991.
Myullerson M. Dva mira dva prava? // Rossiya v global'noy politike/ [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy: http://globalaffairs.ru/number/Dva-mira--dva-prava-16587
Brzezinski Zb. The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership. New York. 2004.
Krauthammer C. The Unipolar Moment by, Foreign Affairs, Winter 1990/1991.
Lyuttvak E. Strategiya. Logika voyny i mira, M., 2012.
Rezul'taty golosovaniya po Rezolyutsii General'noy Assamblei OON A/RES/68/262 o territorial'noy tselostnosti Ukrainy [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: svobodnyy http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/262&referer=/english/&Lang=R; http://www.un.org/russian/news/story.asp?newsID=21375#.Uzhe8Kh_u9Y
Manoylo A.V. Informatsionnoe protivoborstvo v usloviyakh psikhologicheskoy voyny. // Zakon i pravo.-2003.-12. S. 31-34.
Borodinov E.N. Analiz krymskoy vneshnepoliticheskoy operatsii // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 81 - 88. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12586. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12586.html
Gusher A.I. Politicheskiy krizis na Ukraine // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 3. - C. 15 - 26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.3.11502. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11502.html
Lasariya A.O. Osobennosti etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov na postsovetskom prostranstve // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 75 - 77. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.1.13507.
Gusher A.I. Krizis na Ukraine: geopoliticheskie i geostrategicheskie aspekty // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 79 - 89. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.4.11605. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11605.html
Bocharnikov I.V. Ukrainskiy krizis kak element poyasa strategicheskogo okruzheniya Rossii // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 7 - 32. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.4.11617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_11617.html
Vinogradova E.A. Rol' publichnoy diplomatii ALBA v uregulirovanii siriyskogo konflikta // Mirovaya politika. - 2015. - 1. - C. 55 - 65. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2015.1.12619. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12619.html
Karpovich O.G. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii i ikh rol' v preduprezhdenii, uregulirovanii i razreshenii etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 398 - 405. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11786.
Manoylo A.V. Strategii "upravlyaemogo khaosa" v usloviyakh khaotizatsii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: mif ili real'nost'? // Mirovaya politika. - 2014. - 1. - C. 1 - 3. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2014.1.10750. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10750.html
Arlyapova E.S. Rossiya Serbiya: uroki i perspektivy integratsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 3. - C. 374 - 383. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.3.12040.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard