Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Yakovleva I.G. Legal nature of notice of requesting a financial quote

Abstract: The article examines the legal nature of notice of a financial quote request, as well as regulation of this procedure in the Federal Law of the Russian Federation from 07.21.2005 No. 94-FZ “On Order Placement for Goods, Work, or Services for Government or Municipal Authorities”, and Federal Law from 01.01.2014 No. 44-FZ “On Contractual System in the Area of Order Placement for Goods, Work, or Services for Government or Municipal Authorities. Analyzing the Federal Law No. 44-FZ, particularly in the area of regulation of notification of requesting a financial quote, a number of flaws have been detected in this law. Proposals are made on changes that would improve the purchasing process and decrease the level of corruption and other abuses in the area of government and municipal contracts. Among others is the proposal to establish a requirement to provide an initial maximum cost of the contract as an average of all participants in the bidding process; a proposal is being made to change the method of expert estimate to determine the initial (maximum) cost of the contract.

Keywords:

Purchasing, Government contract, Notice, Contract system, Quote request, Legislative improvements, Contract signing, Bidding, Proposal, Acceptance

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' vtoraya) ot 26.01.1996 ¹ 14-FZ (red. ot 14.06.2012) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. – 29.01.1996. – ¹ 5. – St. 410.
2. Federal'nyi zakon ot 07.07.2003 ¹ 126-FZ (red. ot 07.05.2013) «O svyazi» // Rossiiskaya gazeta.  ¹ 135.  10.07.2003.
3. Federal'nyi zakon ot 06.04.2011 ¹ 63-FZ (red. ot 05.04.2013) «Ob elektronnoi podpisi» // Rossiiskaya gazeta.  ¹ 75.  08.04.2011.
4. Federal'nyi zakon ot 21.07.2005 ¹ 94-FZ (red. ot 02.07.2013) «O razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» // Rossiiskaya gazeta.  ¹ 163.  28.07.2005.
5. Federal'nyi zakon ot 05.04.2013 ¹ 44-FZ (red. ot 02.07.2013) «O kontraktnoi sisteme v sfere zakupok tovarov, rabot, uslug dlya obespecheniya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» // Rossiiskaya gazeta.  ¹ 80.  12.04.2013.
6. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 25.05.2005 ¹ 328 (red. ot 06.10.2011) «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil okazaniya uslug podvizhnoi svyazi» // Rossiiskaya gazeta.  ¹ 115.  01.06.2005.
7. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ¹ 6, Plenuma VAS RF ¹ 8 ot 01.07.1996. «O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem chasti pervoi Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii» // Vestnik VAS RF.  ¹ 9.  1996.
8. Postanovleniya FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 19 iyulya 2012 g. ¹ A05-12145/2011, ot 18 dekabrya 2008 g. ¹ A56-11695/2008. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9. Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 26.11.2012 po delu ¹ A44-6555/2011. Trebovanie: Ob osparivanii resheniya i predpisaniya antimonopol'nogo organa. Obstoyatel'stva: Antimonopol'nym organom vyyavleno narushenie upravleniem PF RF zakonodatel'stva o razmeshchenii zakazov, chto vyrazilos' v nerassmotrenii zayavki, podannoi na ukazannyi v izveshchenii o provedenii torgov adres elektronnoi pochty. Reshenie: V udovletvorenii trebovaniya otkazano, poskol'ku dokazatel'stv nevozmozhnosti prochitat' poluchennyi po elektronnoi pochte dokument ne predstavleno. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. Postanovlenie FAS Dal'nevostochnogo okruga ot 05.05.2011 ¹ F03-1589/2011 po delu ¹ A59-3639/2010. Pravomerno udovletvoreno chastichno zayavlenie o priznanii nedeistvitel'nymi resheniya i predpisaniya antimonopol'nogo organa v chasti razmeshcheniya zakazov, poskol'ku kotirovochnaya zayavka predprinimatelya ne sootvetstvovala trebovaniyam, utverzhdennym dlya elektronnogo dokumenta, i predstavlyala soboi kopiyu, poluchennuyu v rezul'tate operatsii skanirovaniya originala bumazhnogo dokumenta, v svyazi s chem osnovanii dlya prinyatiya i rassmotreniya dannoi zayavki naryadu s prochimi u komissii ne imelos'. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
11. Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 28.09.2011 po delu ¹ A41-38111/10. Trebovanie: Ob otmene resheniya antimonopol'nogo organa. Obstoyatel'stva: Zakazchik otklonil kotirovochnuyu zayavku obshchestva na pravo zaklyucheniya gosudarstvennogo kontrakta, tak kak k nei ne prilozhena lokal'naya smeta, podacha zayavok predusmotrena tol'ko v pis'mennoi forme. V svyazi s etim zakazchik priznan narushivshim Zakon o razmeshchenii zakazov.eshenie: Trebovanie udovletvoreno, poskol'ku uslovie o predostavlenii smety ne privelo k ogranicheniyu kolichestva uchastnikov razmeshcheniya zakaza, vozmozhnost' priema zayavok v elektronnoi forme otsutstvovala. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
12. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 16.12.2008 ¹ F09-9423/08-S1 po delu ¹ A50-8939/08. Reshenie antimonopol'nogo organa o priznanii v deistviyakh organa mestnogo samoupravleniya narushenii Federal'nogo zakona «O razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» pravomerno priznano nedeistvitel'nym, poskol'ku predpriyatiem, predstavivshim kotirovochnuyu zayavku, ne soblyudeny trebovaniya izveshcheniya o provedenii zaprosa kotirovok tsen. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
13. Postanovlenie FAS Ural'skogo okruga ot 04.08.2011 ¹ F09-4769/11 po delu ¹ A50-25782/10. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
14. Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 25.01.2010 po delu ¹ A05-11457/2009. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
15. Postanovlenie Dvenadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 18.01.2010 po delu ¹ A12-17613/2009. Po delu o priznanii nezakonnymi punktov resheniya antimonopol'noi sluzhby v otnoshenii deistvii zakazchika i upolnomochennogo organa o priznanii zakazchikom kotirovochnoi zayavki OOO ne sootvetstvuyushchei trebovaniyam, ustanovlennym v izveshchenii o provedenii zaprosa kotirovok tsen. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
16. Postanovlenie Chetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 03.09.2009 po delu ¹ A05-6426/2009. Reshenie UFAS v chasti priznaniya obosnovannoi zhaloby OOO ChOP o priznanii kotirovochnoi komissii, sozdannoi zakazchikom, narushivshei chasti 1, 3 stat'i 47 Zakona ¹ 94-FZ, priznano zakonnym, poskol'ku kotirovochnaya zayavka soderzhit vse neobkhodimye svedeniya, v tom chisle dannye o prilozheniyakh (smetnyi raschet stoimosti rabot i kopii litsenzii po profilyu vypolnyaemykh rabot), a predlozhenie tseny uslug ne prevyshaet maksimal'nuyu tsenu. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
17. Postanovleniya FAS Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 20 marta 2012 g. ¹ A52-2001/2011, FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 28 sentyabrya 2011 g. ¹ A41-38111/10. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
18. Postanovlenie Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 31.07.2009 ¹ 46-AD09-3. Sudebnye akty po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii ostavleny bez izmeneniya, poskol'ku deistviya zayavitelya kvalifitsirovany pravil'no po ch. 6 st. 7.30 KoAP RF, a administrativnoe nakazanie naznacheno v predelakh, ustanovlennykh sanktsiei ch. 6 st. 7.30 KoAP RF. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
19. Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 27.02.2009 po delu ¹ A55-10735/2008. Zayavlenie o priznanii nedeistvitel'nymi resheniya i predpisaniya antimonopol'nogo organa ob ustranenii narushenii zakonodatel'stva o razmeshchenii zakazov udovletvoreno, poskol'ku v deistviyakh kotirovochnoi komissii zayavitelya, otklonivshei zayavku litsa, ne podtverdivshego svoi status uchastnika razmeshcheniya zakaza putem prilozheniya sootvetstvuyushchei doverennosti na litso, podpisavshee zayavku, otsutstvuet narushenie Zakona o razmeshchenii zakazov. // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
20. Postanovlenie FAS Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 16.12.2010 po delu ¹ A03-2952/2010. Otsutstvie v FZ «O razmeshchenii zakazov na postavki tovarov, vypolnenie rabot, okazanie uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal'nykh nuzhd» pryamogo ukazaniya na neobkhodimost' predstavleniya doverennosti predstavitelya ne osvobozhdaet ego ot obyazannosti podtverzhdeniya polnomochii v sootvetstvii s normami GK RF.
21. Postanovlenie FAS Povolzhskogo okruga ot 27.02.2009 po delu ¹ A55-9901/2008. Zayavlenie o priznanii nedeistvitel'nymi resheniya i predpisaniya antimonopol'nogo organa ob ustranenii narushenii zakonodatel'stva o razmeshchenii zakazov udovletvoreno, poskol'ku v deistviyakh kotirovochnoi komissii zayavitelya, otklonivshei zayavku litsa, ne podtverdivshego svoi status uchastnika razmeshcheniya zakaza putem prilozheniya sootvetstvuyushchei doverennosti na litso, podpisavshee zayavku, otsutstvuet narushenie Zakona o razmeshchenii zakazov.
22. Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 25.06.2012 po delu ¹ A42-7852/2011. Protsedura razmeshcheniya zakazov putem zaprosa kotirovok yavlyaetsya strogo reglamentirovannoi i, v otlichie ot inykh sposobov razmeshcheniya zakazov, ne predpolagaet predstavlenie uchastnikom razmeshcheniya zakaza kakikh-libo dokumentov, krome kotirovochnoi zayavki.
23. Lermontov Yu. Slozhnye voprosy, voznikayushchie pri podache kotirovochnoi zayavki // Rossiiskii bukhgalter.  2013.  ¹ 4.  S. 76-80.
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.