Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

Korolev S.A. Phenomenon of pseudomorphosis: an attempt of reinterpretation

Abstract: The article discusses the possibilities and prerequisites for the re-actualisation of the concept of pseudomorphosis under contemporary conditions. The reference point in the author’s research is the conceptualisation by Oswald Spengler. The author defines pseudomorphosis not only as a global historical shift, a turning point in the development of a society, but also considers pseudomorphosism as a sort of defining characteristic, a quality inherent to the process of historical development, and defined by the significant role of the pseudomorphosis phenomenon in the history of one or another macro-culture. Based on the fact that the main instrument of any scientific research is its conceptual framework, the author describes the basic concepts used in the context of the pseudomorphic development theory of Russia: pseudomorphosis, reception, inversion; in addition, the author introduces the concept of local pseudomorphic space. The novelty of the author’s approach stems from regarding pseudomorphosis not only as a specific historical phenomenon, but also as a type of development inherent in some countries, including in Russia. This implies a broader understanding of this phenomenon than was prescribed by Spengler. The author draws attention to the issue of the reception of socio-cultural content during the process of pseudomorphosis, which can be borrowed incompletely, selectively, partially. Finally, the proposed conceptualisation involves the understanding of the mechanisms of pseudomorphic development, in particular, the phenomenon of inversion and “revenge” of the repressed autochthonous content.


Keywords:

Spengler, Christianisation, politics, culture, inversion, reception, pseudomorphosis, history, Florovsky, Tsymbursky


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Zhivov V. M. Razyskaniya v oblasti istorii i predystorii russkoy kul'tury. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. 758 s.
2. Fedotova V. G. Apatiya na Zapade i v Rossii // Voprosy filosofii. 2005. ¹ 3. S. 3–19.
3. Buldakov V. P. Quo vadis? Krizisy v Rossii: puti pereosmysleniya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2007. 204 s.
4. Buldakov V. P. Utopiya, agressiya, vlast'. Psikhosotsial'naya dinamika postrevolyutsionnogo vremeni. Rossiya, 1920–1930 gg. M.: ROSSPEN, 2012. 759 s.
5. Akhiezer A. S. Rossiya: Kritika istoricheskogo opyta. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu. T. 2. Sotsiokul'turnyy slovar'. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy khronograf, 1998. 600 s.
6. Korolev S. A. Khristianizatsiya kak psevdomorfoza // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 8. S. 1131–1148.
7. Korolev S. A. «Normannskiy ferment» v kontekste kontseptsii psevdomorfnogo razvitiya Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 3. S.362–382.
8. Mezhuev B. Desyatiletie odnoy psevdomorfozy // Agentstvo politicheskikh novostey. 22.08.2006 // [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://www.apn.ru/publications/article10250.htm (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
9. Vrigt Kh. fon. Modernizatsiya kak psevdomorfoz // Vrigt Kh. fon. Tri myslitelya. SPb.: Russko-baltiyskiy informatsionnyy tsentr «Blits», 2000. S. 247–254.
10. Florovskiy G., prot. Dm. Chizhevskiy. Filosofiya na Ukraine // Put'. [1929]. ¹ 19. S. 118–119.
11. Krauz G.-K. «Zakat Evropy». Rossiya v istoricheskoy mysli Osval'da Shpenglera // Germaniya i russkaya revolyutsiya 1917–1924 / Pod red. G. Kenena, L. Kopeleva. M.: Pamyatniki istoricheskoy mysli, 2004. 390 s.
12. Gavrilyuk P. Georges Florovsky and the Russian Religious Renaissance. Changing Paradigms in Historical and Systematic Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 297 p.
13. «My zakrutilis' v kakom-to strannom mezhvremen'e…» Interv'yu s V. L. Tsymburskim // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 8. ¹ 1. 2009. S. 101–118.
14. Tsymburskiy V. Novyy vozrast Rossii // Russkiy zhurnal. 04.10.2007 // [Elektronnyy resurs] – URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Novyj-vozrast-Rossii (data obrashcheniya: 11.04.2015).
15. Florovskiy G., prot. Puti russkogo bogosloviya. 2-e izd. Parizh: Imka-Press, 1981. 600 s.
16. Shpengler O. Zakat Evropy. Ocherki morfologii mirovoy istorii. T. 2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. M.: Mysl', 1998. 606 s.
17. Korolev S. A. Psevdomorfoza kak tip razvitiya: sluchay Rossii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 6. S. 72–85.
18. Korolev S. A. Modernizatsiya i demodernizatsiya v rossiyskoy istorii. Chast' I // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2009. ¹ 1. S. 72–80.
19. Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., Yakovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo? 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2013. 496 s.
20. Korolev S. A. Povsednevnost' kak emanatsiya sotsial'nosti: transformatsii i trendy // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. ¹ 8. S. 356–422.
21. Vernadskiy G. V. Mongoly i Rus'. Tver'; M.: LEAN; Agraf, 2001. 480 s.
22. Pokhlebkin V. V. Tatary i Rus'. 360 let otnosheniy Rusi s tatarskimi gosudarstvami v XIII–XVI vv. 1238–1598 gg. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2000. 192 s.