Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Ponochevnaya I.D. Paul Kurtz and the Philosophical Critique of Secular Humanism

Abstract: The article explores the attitude of Paul Kurtz (1925-2012), who is considered by many to be the father of the secular humanist movement, towards philosophical critique of the scientific methodology and humanistic values. The author analyzes Paul Kurtz’ understanding and interpretation of the works of such philosophers as Søren Kierkegaard, Martin Heidegger, Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Jacques Lacan, and his counter-arguments used against the following concepts: radical subjectivism, irrationalism, anti-humanism and philosophical pessimism. In her research Ponochevnaya has used the methods that are usually used in humanitarian disciplines. These methods include the comparative historical, conceptual problematic, classification and system-forming methods. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that for the first time in the academic literature the researcher conducts a fundamental analysis of Paul Kurtz' views on the key issues of existential and post-modern philosophy. The main conclusion of the research is the definition of ideological contradictions between humanistic and pragmatistic traditions, on the one hand, and philosophy of existentialism and philosophy of French post-modernism, on the other hand. 


Keywords:

subjectivism, anti-humanism, Martin Heidegger, Soren Kierkegaard, Paul Kurtz, secular humanism, postmodernism, pragmatism, anthropology, irrationalism


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kurtts P. Gumanizm i skeptitsizm – paradigmy kul'tury tret'ego tysyacheletiya // Zdravyy Smysl, ¹17, 2000 g.
2. Kurtts P. Iskushenie potustoronnim. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 1999 (vpervye opublikovano na angliyskom yazyke v 1987 g.)
3. Deklaratsiya svetskogo gumanizma // Sovremennyy gumanizm: dokumenty i issledovaniya. Pod obshch. red. Kuvakina V. A., Kruglova A. G. M.: RGO, 2000
4. Dekomb V. Sovremennaya frantsuzskaya filosofiya. M.: Ves' mir, 2000.
5. Kun T. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT», 2003
6. Guseynov A.A. Perestroyka: novyy obraz morali // Eticheskaya mysl'. M.: Respublika, 1990.
7. Gurevich P.S. Chelovek kak ob'ekt sotsial'no-filosofskogo analiza // Problema cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii. M.: Progress, 1988. S. 504-517;
8. Adorno T.V. Posle Osventsima // Negativnaya dialektika. M.: Nauchnyy mir, 2003, s. 322-333.
9. Sheehan T. Heidegger and the Nazis // The New York Review of Books V.35, N.10, June 16, 1988 (primechanie k stat'e ¹5) < http://nybooks.com/articles/archives/1988/jun/16/heidegger–and–the–nazis/ >
10. Madigan Timothy J. Introduction to Part Two // Toward a New Enlightenment: The Philosophy of Paul Kurtz. Ed.by Vern L. Bullough and Timothy J. Madigan, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1994
11. Kurtz P. Toward a New Enlightenment // Toward A New Enlightenment. Transaction Publishers, 1994
12. Kurtz P. The Relevance of Science to Ethics // Toward A New Enlightenment. Transaction Publishers, 1994
13. Kurtz P. Kierkegaard, Existentialism, and the Contemporary Scene // The Antioch Review, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Winter, 1961-1962), pp. 471-487
14. Kurtz P. Antiscience Paradigm // Skepticism and Humanism. The New Paradigm. Transaction Publishers, 2001.
15. Geroulanos S. Slaughterbench of Humanisms: The 1987 Heidegger Affair in Intellectual-Historical Perspective // Journal of French Philosophy, Volume 17, Number 1, Spring 2007.
16. Farias V. Heidegger and Nazism. Temple University Press, 1989
17. Ferry L., Alain R. French Philosophy of the Sixties. An Essay on Antihumanism. Amherst. The University of Massachusetts Press, 1990 (vpervye opublikovano na frantsuzskom yazyke v 1985 g.)
18. Dawkins, Richard. Postmodernism Disrobed // Nature. 1998. Vol. 394. P. 141-143 < http://www.physics.nyu.edu/faculty/sokal/dawkins.html >
19. Kurtts P. Muzhestvo stat': Dobrodeteli gumanizma. M.: Rossiyskoe gumanisticheskoe obshchestvo, 2000
20. Kurtts P. Novyy skeptitsizm: Issledovanie i nadezhnoe znanie. M.: Nauka, 2005
21. Lamont M. Kak stat' samym vazhnym filosofom: sluchay Derrida. «Logos» ¹4-5 (72). 2009, S. 3-42 (vpervye opublikovano na angliyskom yazyke v 1987 g.).
22. Lenel'-Lavastin A. Zabytyy fashizm: Ionesko, Eliade, Choran. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007
23. Ponochevnaya I. D. Svetskiy gumanizm i religioznyy konservatizm v SShA // Religiovedenie-2014.-¹ 2.-S. 125-133
24. Ponochevnaya I. D. U istokov svetskogo gumanizma Vestnik SPbGU (seriya 6). // Izd-vo S.-Peterb. gos. un-ta, 2014
25. Sartr Zh.P. Ekzistentsializm – eto gumanizm // Sumerki bogov. M.: Politizdat, 1990. S. 319-344.
26. Sokal A. Brinkmon Zh. Intellektual'nye ulovki, M.: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 2002 (vpervye opublikovano na angliyskom yazyke v 1997 g.)
27. Solzhenitsyn A. Raskolotyy mir. Rech' na assamblee vypusknikov Garvardskogo universiteta 8 iyunya 1978 g. // Russkoe vozrozhdenie. Parizh; M.; N'yu-York, 1978. ¹ 2. S. 85—109. Tsit. po materialam sayta «Samizdat» < http://antology.igrunov.ru/authors/solzh/1121759601.html >
28. Feyerabend P. Protiv metodologicheskogo prinuzhdeniya // Izbrannye trudy po metodologii nauki. M.: Progress, 1986
29. Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu. Chast' 2. M.: Praksis, 2005.
30. Khaydegger M. Pis'mo o gumanizme // Vremya i bytie: Stat'i i vystupleniya: Per. s nem. M.: Respublika, 1993. S. 192-201.
31. Chernyy Yu. Yu. Sovremennyy gumanizm (obzor) // M.: INION RAN «Filosofiya v XX veke. Ch. 2», 2001