Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Esakov G.A. Universal criminal jurisdiction (due to crimes of terroristic nature)

Abstract: The subject of this research is the issues of defining, establishing, and applying the universal jurisdiction within Russian criminal law. The author examines the questions of forming a universal jurisdiction in the Lotus and Arrest Warrant cases; its problematic issues such as trial in absence of the defendant are being reviewed. The main subject of the article focuses on the problems of universal jurisdiction due to crimes of terroristic nature. A research is conducted on the possible vectors of future development of the Russian criminal law in the area of universal jurisdiction, including the aspect of adhering to the norms of international law. The main conclusions of the conducted research pertain to the determination of the place, significance, and future prospects for development of the universal jurisdiction within Russian law. The author determines possible directions for improving criminal legislation, reveals possible complications and proposes the ways to solve them in accordance with the positions of international law and practice of international courts.


Keywords:

International Court of Justice, international law, terroristic crimes, citizenship, applicability of criminal legislation, universal jurisdiction, Lotus principle, jurisdiction, trial in absentia, criminal law


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Sienkho Yii. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: ponyatie, teoriya i praktika // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 4.
2. Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie narusheniy mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava na osnovanii printsipa universal'nosti // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. ¹ 6.
3. Rusinova V. N. Presledovanie voennykh prestupleniy, sovershennykh v nemezhdunarodnykh konfliktakh, na osnove universal'nogo printsipa yurisdiktsii // Voenno-yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. ¹ 5.
4. Ledyakh I. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya kak printsip ugolovnogo presledovaniya i nakazaniya v mezhdunarodnom gumanitarnom i mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave // Yurist-mezhdunarodnik. 2008. ¹ 2.
5. Korolev G. A. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya: opredelenie, osnovaniya primeneniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. ¹ 3.
6. Korolev G. A. Problemy primeneniya universal'noy yurisdiktsii in absentia // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2009. ¹ 107
7. David E. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov / per. s fr. 2-e izd., M., 2011.
8. Shaw M. N. International Law. 6th ed. Cambridge, 2008.
9. Verle G. Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava / per. s angl. S. V. Sayapina. Odessa; M., 2011.
10. Mandat d’arrêt du 11 avril 2000 (République démocratique du Congo c. Belgique), C.I.J. Recueil 2002.
11. Kreß C. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Insti-tut de Droit international // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4.
12. Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3rd ed. / revised by A. Cassese et al. Oxford, 2013.
13. Affaire du Lotus, 1927, C.P.J.I. Recueil série A, nº 10.
14. Cassese A. Is the Bell Tolling for Universality? A Plea for a Sensible Notion of Universal Jurisdiction // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2003. Vol. 1.
15. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Obshchaya chast': uchebnik / pod red. V. S. Komissarova, N. E. Krylovoy, I. M. Tyazhkovoy. M., 2012.
16. Shturma P. Universal'naya yurisdiktsiya i nakazanie za ser'eznye narusheniya Zhenevskikh konventsiy 1949 g. // Pravovedenie. 2010. ¹ 4.