Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Ursul, A.D. On the way to the noospheric civilization: relation between civilizational and noospheric researches

Abstract: In his article Ursul discusses the beginning and development of a new stage in noospheric researches. At this stage noospherogenesis is related to sustainable development, continued globalization, formation of a global information society and other global processes. The modern, or non-classical, stage of noospheric researches is being formed under the influence of noospheric researches of the aforesaid processes. It is underlined that even though the author of the article describes the most important factors for the development of noosphere concept, there are many other factors like that, especially intellectual and cognitive factors. Ursul offers a hypothesis that the global civilization develops as a result of globalization processes caused by sustainable development as well as the process of formation of the noospheric socio-natural interaction and creation of a universal information society which will eventually lead to creation of the first sphere of intelligence, infonoosphere, provided that the transfer to the sustainable development will happen which prolongs the period of this stage. According to the author, transition to the global sustainable development involves the observance of the principle of biosphere preservation and formation of the sphere of intelligence mostly by means of transformations of the sociosphere combined with minimum anthropological influences on the biosphere. In this regard, biosphere preservation involves implementation of the principle of co-evoluation of nature and society, i. e. their mutual preservation and development when the humankind can exist for a very long time and the biosphere can remain sustainable and evolve due to the significant reducation of anthropological influence thereon. In his research Ursul has used not only evolutionaryhistorical and futurological-prognostic but also interdisciplinary and comparative approaches. Special attention is paid at the intensive development of integrative general scientific processes and methods of knowledge generation and formation of new “cognitive clusters’ and conceptual-methodological frameworks. Ursul also focuses on different approaches to studies of the future. These approaches have been rather autonomous but now they start to have more crossing points. Human civilization has been usually studied from the point of view of the civilizational approach but lately there has appeared a new approach to studies of the future — noospheric-futurological approach. Based on the author, only the combination of all efficient approaches and research methods may create an integrated image of human future. However, in the present article Ursul focuses only on civilizational and noospheric approaches and associated researches. The author shows that the imperative transition to sustainable development is crucial for the future noospherogenesis but it also demands to extend civilizational processes to the global level because such a transition would be impossible within the limits of a local civilization or even a group of local civilizations. It becomes especially essential considering the ongoing globalization process that is aimed at creating the universal civilization. These two global processes shall become one and create the universal integrity of the civilization which will be influenced by other noospherization processes as well. From the very beginning the noospheric civilization can be only global and this is what the author of the article tries to prove to the reader using futurological and logical arguments. Noospherogenesis is viewed as the future global process of the formation of the socio-natural sphere of civilization existence where intellectual and information activities will become the most important driver of evolution. According to the author, this will be the result of the most successful implementation of rational-humanistic values, principles and ideals through transition to sustainable development and formation of a noospheric collective intelligence. As the future global process, noospherogenesis would be an essential stage in the global evolution that will take place in socio-natural and socio-cultural environment on Earth at first and out of Earth afterwards.


Keywords:

globalization, global civilization, infonoosphere, noosphere, noospheric civilization, noospheric researches, noospherogenesis, sustainable development, civilizational researches, civilization.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Global Studies Encyclopedic Dictionary / Ed. by A. N. Chumakov, I. I. Mazour and W. C. Gay. Amsterdam, New York: Independent Publisher of International. 2014.
2. Berger P.L., Huntington S.P. (eds.). Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World. Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.
3. Encyclopedia of Global Studies. / Ed. Helmut K. Anheier, Mark Juergensmeyer.-Los Angeles, London and others: SAGE Publications, 2012
4. Yanshina F.T. Evolyutsiya vzglyadov V.I.Vernadskogo na biosferu i razvitie ucheniya o noosfere. M.: Nauka. 1996.
5. Yakovets Yu. V. Velikaya nauchnaya revolyutsiya XXI veka. M.: MISK. 2010.
6. Yakovets Yu.V. Strategiya global'nogo ustoychivogo razvitiya na baze partnerstva tsivilizatsiy. Uchebnik. Elektronnoe izdanie. M.: MISK. 2013.
7. Yakovets Yu.V., Farakh S. Dialog i partnerstvo tsivilizatsiy: Uchebnik. M.: Institut ekonomicheskikh strategiy, 2012.
8. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy. M.: AST. 2003.
9. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A., Farakh S.N. Na puti k noosfernoy tsivilizatsii. Uchebnik. // Beyrut – Moskva. Izdanie Otkrytogo mezhdunarodnogo universiteta dialoga tsivilizatsiy. 2014.
10. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A., Ivanov A.V. Problema bezopasnosti v perspektive ustoychivogo razvitiya. M.: Universitetskaya kniga. 2014.
11. Ursul A.D. Chelovechestvo. Zemlya. Vselennaya. Filosofskie problemy kosmonavtiki. M.: Mysl'. 1977.
12. Ursul A.D. Fenomen noosfery: global'naya evolyutsiya i noosferogenez. M.: Lenand. 2015.
13. Ursul A.D. Perekhod Rossii k ustoychivomu razvitiyu Rossii. Noosfernaya strategiya. M.: Noosfera. 1998.
14. Ursul A.D. Put' v noosferu (Kontseptsiya vyzhivaniya i ustoychivogo razvitiya tsivilizatsii). M.: Luch, 1993.
15. Universal'naya i global'naya istoriya (evolyutsiya Vselennoy, Zemli, zhizni, obshchestva). Volgograd: Uchitel'. 2012.
16. Turchin A., Batin M. Futurologiya. XXI vek: bessmertie ili global'naya katastrofa // http://bit.ly/dn2kNV.
17. Toynbi A. Tsivilizatsiya pered sudom istorii. M. — SPb.: Progress, kul'tura, 1999.
18. Toynbi A. Postizhenie istorii. M.: Progress, 1991.
19. Teyyar de Sharden P. Fenomen cheloveka. M.: Izd-vo «Nauka». 1987.
20. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika. M.: Astrel', 2003.
21. Stepin V.S. Tsivilizatsiya i kul'tura. SPb., 2011.
22. Sorokin P.A. Glavnye tendentsii nashego vremeni. M.: Nauka, 1997.
23. Romanovich A.L., Ursul A.D. Ustoychivoe budushchee (globalizatsiya, bezopasnost', noosferogenez). M.: Zhizn', 2006.
24. Povestka dnya na XXI vek // URL: www.un.org/russian/conferen/wssd/agenda21.
25. Osipov G.V., Kuzyk B.N., Yakovets Yu.V. Perspektivy sotsiokul'turnoy dinamiki i partnerstva tsivilizatsiy. M.: INES, 2007.
26. Nashe obshchee budushchee. Doklad Mezhdunarodnoy komissii po okruzhayushchey srede i razvitiyu / Per. s angl. M.: Progress. 1989.
27. Nazaretyan A.P. Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste Universal'noy istorii (Sinergetika – prognozirovanie – psikhologiya). M., 2004.
28. Nazarov V. N. Fenomenologiya mudrosti: Obrazy mudretsa v istorii kul'tury (nravstvenno-filosofskoe issledovanie). Tula: Izd-vo TGPI im. L.N. Tolstogo. 1993.
29. Moskovchenko A.D. Russkiy kosmizm. Avtotrofnoe chelovechestvo budushchego. Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomsk. gos. un-ta sistem upr. i radioelektroniki, 2012.
30. Moiseev N. N. Sud'ba tsivilizatsii.Put' razuma. M.: MNEPU, 1998.
31. Mesto i rol' gumanizma v budushchey tsivilizatsii / Otv. red. G.L. Belkina. M.: Lenand. 2014.
32. Mezhzherin V.A, Tsivilizatsiya i noosfera. Kn.1, Prichiny vzaimnogo ottorzheniya. Kiev, 1996.
33. Kuzyk B. N., Yakovets Yu. V. Tsivilizatsii: proshloe i budushchee. M.: INES, 2008 (www.library.newparadigm.ru, www.kuzyk.ru).
34. Kuzyk B. N., Yakovets Yu. V. Tsivilizatsii: teoriya, istoriya, dialog, budushchee. T. 1–6. M.: INES, 2006 – 2009 (www.library.newparadigm.ru, www.kuzyk.ru)
35. Kolin K.K., Ursul A.D. Informatsionnaya kul'turologiya: predmet i zadachi novogo nauchnogo napravleniya. Saarbrucken, Germany. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011.
36. Itogovyy dokument Konferentsii OON po ustoychivomu razvitiyu «Budushchee, kotorogo my khotim» // URL:http://www.un.org/ru/sustainablefuture/
37. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Noosferogenez kak global'nyy protsess (kontseptsiya nooglobalistiki) // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya XXVII: Globalistika i geopolitika. 2014. ¹ 1.
38. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Globalistika i global'nye issledovaniya. Global'naya revolyutsiya v nauke. Saarbrucken, Germany. Dictus Publishing. 2014.
39. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyy evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2012.
40. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Kalyuzhnaya D.E. Ustoychivoe razvitie i bezopasnost'. Global'noe izmerenie. Saarbrucken, Germany. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2014.
41. Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D. Global'nye issledovaniya i evolyutsionnyy podkhod. M.: Moskovskiy universitet. 2013.
42. Zhiznesposobnaya planeta zhiznesposobnykh lyudey: budushchee, kotoroe my vybiraem. Gruppa vysokogo urovnya general'nogo sekretarya OON po global'noy ustoychivosti. Obzor. N'yu-York: OON, 2012.
43. Dialog tsivilizatsiy: smysl, idei, tekhnologiya / Pod red. S. Farakha i O. Kolobova. Dar Alya ad-Din. 2008.
44. Global'nye protsessy i ustoychivoe razvitie / Otv. red. A.D. Ursul. M.: RGTEU, 2011.
45. Vernadskiy V.I. Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie. M.: Nauka. 1991.
46. Global'noe budushchee 2045: Antropologicheskiy krizis. Konvergentnye tekhnologii. Transgumanisticheskie proekty. Materialy Pervoy Vserossiyskoy konferentsii, Belgorod, 11 – 12 aprelya 2013 g. / Pod red. D.I. Dubrovskogo, S.M. Klimovoy. – M.: «Kanon+», ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014.
47. Brodel' F. Grammatika tsivilizatsiy. M.: Ves' mir, 2008.
48. Budushchee zhizni i budushchee tsivilizatsii. M., 2009.
49. Budushchee tsivilizatsiy. M.: INES, 2008.
50. Vernadskiy V.I. Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Nauka. 2004.
51. Globalistics and Globalization Studies / Ed. L. E. Grinin, I. V. Ilyin and A. V. Korotayev. Volgograd: ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House, 2012.
52. G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin. M.: MAKS Press, 2012.
53. Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D. Global studies and globalistics. The evolutionary dimension. Saarbrücken. Germany: LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2014.
54. Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D. Global Knowledge Revolution. // Globalistics and Globalization Studies. Aspects & Dimensions of Global Views. Volgograd: Uchitel’ Publishing House. 2014.
55. Ilyin I.V., Ursul A.D. Nooglobalism and Nooglobalistics // 3G: Globalistics, Global Studies, Globalization Studies: Scientific Digest / Ed. by I.I. Abylgaziev, I.V. Ilyin. M.: MAKS Press, 2012.
56. Yakovets Yu. V. The Past and the Future of Civilizations. L.: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2000 (www.library.newparadigm.ru).
57. Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A., Ţîrdea T.N. De gestiune a tranziției la dezvoltarea durabilă: o perspectivă socio-politic // Moldoscopie (Probleme de analize politică). Revistă ştiinţifică trimestrială. Chişinău: USM , 2012. ¹ 11.