Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Akopdhzanova M.O. The principle of freedom of civil legal contract and its criminal legal protection

Abstract: The current Russian legislation provides the principle of a freedom of civil legal contract as one of the key principles of ensuring civil rights of private individuals and legal entities. This article is dedicated to the research of said principle, legal boundaries of the freedom of civil legal agreement, the questions of implementation of imperative and dispositive norms of civil law during signing of legal contracts. The article reviews cases and mechanisms of criminal indictment of individual who have abused their civil rights, violated the civil rights of their business associates, or terms based on the principle of freedom of civil legal agreements. The key aspects of implementation of norms within Russian legislation on freedom civil legal agreements are being researched and analyzed. The conclusions of this article can be useful to citizens, legal entities, as well as the branches of government, local authorities and law enforcement agencies.


Keywords:

Freedom of civil legal contract, limitations, imperative norms, dispositive norms, violation of civil rights, abuse of rights, criminal responsibility, punishment, restitution, criminal legal protection.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Galin K.A. Ogranicheniya printsipa svobody dogovora normami zakona v zakonodatel'stvakh Germanii i Rossii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2012.-4.-C. 135-143.
2. Goncharenko E.A. Osobennosti zaklyucheniya kreditnogo dogovora, ispolnenie kotorogo obespecheno ipotekoi // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.37-43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.4.2227. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_2227.html
3. K.A. Galin K voprosu o sovremennom soderzhanii printsipa svobody dogovora v zakonodatel'stve Germanii i Rossii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2011.-5.-C. 134-139.
4. A. A. Engel'gardt Osnovaniya primeneniya norm ob ideal'noi sovokupnosti prestuplenii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-2.-C. 282-287.
5. Iodkovskii E.V. Tendentsii primeneniya reshenii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava.-2012.-2.-C. 196-206.
6. Fedin V.V. Sootnoshenie printsipa svobody truda i prava na trud // Lex Russica.-2004. – ¹ 2. – S. 411-435.
7. Akhrameeva O.V. Opredelenie podsudnosti v delakh pri osparivanii obyazatel'stv po dogovoru, v kotorom ne opredeleno mesto ego ispolneniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 168-176. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.7.8939. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8939.html
8. Dmitriev M.A. Printsip svobody dogovora (kommentarii k stat'e 421 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii) // Mirovoi sud'ya. – 2011.-¹ 12. – S. 10-14.
9. Yu.V. Umnova Obshchestvennaya opasnost' v protsesse ugolovnogo pravotvorchestva i pravoprimeneniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava.-2011.-2.-C. 208-214.
10. Buyukli V.I. Sub''ektnoe izmerenie funktsii okhrany prava // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-1.-C. 1-18. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10157. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10157.html
11. Moldovanov M.M. Analiz dogovora bankovskogo vklada kak instrumenta bor'by s mirovym finansovo-ekonomicheskim krizisom na primere ryada zarubezhnykh gosudarstv // NB: Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.100-120. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4234.2013.1.569. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/flc/article_569.htm
12. Karchevskii N.V. Osnovnye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva v kontekste sotsial'nykh tendentsii informatizatsii // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 152 - 196. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.6.8317. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_8317.html
13. Tokarchuk R.E. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' kak obshchii printsip ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 1. - C. 126 - 142. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_51.html