Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Yanik A.A. Control over the socio-economic changes under the conditions of crisis: how can China’s experience help Russia?

Abstract: This article reviews social, economic and political changes in Russia, as well as compares them with the reforms conducted in China. The author analyzes positive and negative aspects pertaining to the concept of using as a strategy of development a so called “Chinese model” as a more successful alternative to the strategy of liberalization, which was adopted from the Western European countries and North America. A special attention is given to the problem about the “non-economic phenomena” that have an impact upon the accuracy of choice and the success of realization of the antirecession policy of the country. The causes of the objective decrease of the state government that is based on the values of democracy are examined under the conditions of globalization. The author marks the differences between the notions “Washington consensus” and “Washington hypothesis”. It is demonstrated that the scientific concept about the essence of the “China’s experience” emerged a lot later the time, when the reforms began within USSR; hence, they could not be borrowed by the Soviet government.


Keywords:

Strategy of development, economic crisis, globalization, “Beijing consensus”, “Washington consensus”, “Mumbai consensus”, China’s experience, radical reforms, socio-economic reforms, effectiveness of state government.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. A. D. Ursul, T. A. Ursul Budushchee global'nogo mira: obespechenie bezopasnosti cherez ustoichivoe razvitie // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-3.-C. 23-36.
2. I.V. Plyugina, E.E. Rafalyuk, S.A. Perchatkina Gosudarstvo v menyayushchemsya mire: obzor raboty VI Mezhdunarodnoi shkoly. // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya.-2011.-3.-C. 126-143.
3. Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya II. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-8.-C. 1-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.8.5109. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_5109.html
4. Aleinikov A.V. Sistemnye konflikty v Rossii: kontseptual'nye osnovaniya analiza. Stat'ya 1. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-7.-C. 94-140. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.7.2306. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_2306.html
5. Kornai Ya. Put' k svobodnoi ekonomike (strastnoe slovo v zashchitu ekonomicheskikh preobrazovanii) / Pred. N.Ya. Petrakova. M.: Ekonomika, 1990.
6. Voloshin O. Gosudarstvo tol'ko nachinaetsya: o kruglom stole zhurnala «Ekspert» s uchastiem Frensisa Fukuyamy // Ekspert-Ukraina. 2006. 23 oktyabrya.
7. Kornai Ya. «Put' k svobodnoi ekonomike»: desyat' let spustya (pereosmyslivaya proshloe) // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2000. ¹ 12. S. 41–55.
8. Williamson J. What Should the World Bank Think About the Washington Consensus? // World Bank Research Observer. 2000. Vol. 15. ¹ 2. P. 251–264.
9. Wong E. “China Model” Losses Some of its Luster // International Gerald Tribune. 2012. May 11. P. 1, 9.
10. Williamson J. A Short History of the Washington Consensus. Paper for a conference “From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance”, Barcelona, Sept. 24-25, 2004. URL: http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson0904-2.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014).
11. Rudra N. Globalization and the strengthening of democracy in the developing world // American Journal of Political Science. 2005. Vol. 49. ¹ 4. P.704–730
12. The Economist: Pocket World in Figures. 2009 Edition. L.: PROFILE BOOKS, 2008.
13. The Impact of China’s Tiananmen Massacre / Ed. by J.-P. Béja (China Policy Series). Routledge, 2010.
14. Ramo J. C. The Beijing Consensus. L.: Foreign Policy Centre. May. 2004 / URL: http://www.fpc.org.uk/fsblob/244.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014).
15. Quinn A. Time-traveling Larry Summers envisions “Mumbai Consensus”. 2 June 2010 // Ofitsial'nyi sait «Reuters». URL: http://blogs.reuters.com/talesfromthetrail/2010/06/02/time-traveling-larry-summers-envisions-mumbai-consensus/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.09.2014).
16. Muldavin J. China’s Shaky Economic Foundation // The New York Times. 2011. December 30.
17. New Ideas on Development after the Financial Crisis / Eds. N. Birdsall, F. Fukuyama. John Hopkins University Press, 2011.
18. Made in America, Again: Why Manufacturing Will Return to the US / H.L. Sirkin, M. Zinser, D. Hohner. The Boston Consulting Group. August 2011.
19. Lardy N.R. Sustaining China’s Economic Growth After the Global Financial Crisis. Washington, DC. Peterson Institute Press, 2012. 181 p.
20. Kupchan C. A. The Democratic Malaise: Globalization and the Threat to the West // Foreign Affairs. 2012. Vol. 91. N 1. P. 62–67.
21. Islam N. Was the Gradual Approach Not Possible in the USSR? A Critique of the Sachs-Woo ‘Impossibility Hypothesis’// Comparative Economic Studies. 2011. Vol. 53. No 1. P.83–147.
22. Fukuyama F. State-building: Governance and World Order in the Twenty-first Century. L.: PROFILE BOOKS, 2004.
23. Giavazzi F., Tabellini G. Economic and Political Liberalization // Journal of Monetary Economics. 2005. Vol. 52. ¹ 7. P. 1297-1330; i dr.
24. Eichengreen B., Leblang D. Democracy and Globalization // Economics & Politics. Vol. 20. ¹
25. P. 289-334. 3.Ferguson N. Civilization: The West and the Rest. L.: Penguin Books. 2011.
26. Dailami M. Financial Openness, Democracy, and Redistributive Policy. Policy Research Paper ¹ 2372.-Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2000.
27. Troshchinskii P.V.. Pravo i politika sovremennogo Kitaya // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 7. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.7.8822
28. Borodin E.A.. Sovremennye politicheskie realii Tsentral'noi Azii: Rossiya, Kitai i Kyrgyzstan // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2014.1.9997
29. Guan'tsyun' L.. Rol' taivan'skoi problemy v morskoi politike KNR // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9754
30. Zamaraeva N.A.. Pakistan — Gvadar — Kitai: regional'nyi peredel // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.3.8980
31. I.M. Afanas'eva. Integrirovannaya model' politicheskogo vzaimovliyaniya v kontinental'nom Kitae i administrativnom raione Syangan // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.03.12
32. E. V. Solov'eva. Strategicheskoe partnerstvo Rossii i Kitaya kak faktor kul'turnogo vzaimodeistviya v sovremennykh politicheskikh usloviyakh // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
33. S. A. Sidorov. Kontseptsiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti KNR v kontekste mezhdunarodnoi i natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
34. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107.
35. A. L. Verchenko. Sin'khaiskaya revolyutsiya: nekotorye aspekty obnovleniya kitaiskogo obshchestva // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2011. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107
36. E. A. Kalinin K voprosu ob ideologicheskikh osnovakh printsipov
37. mezhdunarodnogo ekonomicheskogo prava
38. i Rossiya kak polnopravnyi uchastnik
39. mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 8. - C. 1323 - 1334.
40. Zaryanov E.P. Myagkaya sila kak kharakternyi priznak politicheskogo vliyaniya velikoi derzhavy v usloviyakh mnogopolyarnogo mira // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 89 - 122. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2015.1.12649. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_12649.html