Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shovkrinskiy A.Y. Exhaustion of domestic remedies and laws governing the international organizations

Abstract: This article examines the issue of “exhaustion of domestic remedies” in disputes where the defendant is an international organization (and the plaintiff is most often an employee of this organization). The author believes that the term “exhaustion of domestic remedies” in disputes where the defendant is an international organization is more of a technical term, as these subjects of international law do not have the same mechanism as the countries. Nevertheless, the article reviews the question of resolving the disputes within specialized tribunals of international organizations. The author claims that if an international organization has acts that defi ne the competency and operating procedures of the administrative tribunals contain the norm requiring the exhaustion of all domestic remedies, then this must be executed by the plaintiff. On the other hand, if such obligation is not present, it seems that the plaintiff does not have to exercise any domestic remedies that are set in place within the international organizations, as the general international law does not impose such mandate.


Keywords:

International law, European Law, UN, international organizations, tribunals, courts, domestic remedies, plaintiff, defendant, dispute.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Ritter La Protection diplomatique a l’ygard d’une organisation international // 8 AFDI. 1962. R. 454ff.
2. Wellens K. Remedies against International Organizations. Cambridge University Press, 2002. R. 66-67.
3. Cançado Trindade A. A. Exhaustion of local remedies and the law of international organizations // Revue de droit international et de sciences diplomatiques, vol. 57 (1979). R. 81.
4. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
5. Danel'yan A.A.. Pravovye voprosy prinuditel'nogo iz'yatiya inostrannoy sobstvennosti i inostrannykh investitsiy v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11507
6. Smirnova E.S. Problemy prebyvaniya inostrannykh grazhdan na territorii gosudarstva i voprosy obespecheniya ikh bezopasnosti // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.39-66. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.676. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_676.html
7. Kostenko N.I.. Kontseptsiya stanovleniya mezhdunarodnogo ugolovno-ispolnitel'nogo (penitentsiarnogo) prava // Pravo i politika. – 2014. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.4.11614
8. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiyskoy Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoy zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
9. Shinkaretskaya G.G.. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy sud: popytka otsenki // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2014. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.1.11593
10. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeyskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
11. A.S. Smbatyan. Organy mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya: klassifikatsiya v ramkakh obshchey sistemy // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.04.12
12. A.S. Smbatyan. Pervoe reshenie Suda evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva – v kopilku avtoriteta // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
13. A. S. Smbatyan. Obychnye normy mezhdunarodnogo prava i obshchie printsipy kak istochnik sudebnogo pravotvorchestva // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 4. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Smbatyan. Pravotvorchestvo mezhdunarodnykh ugolovnykh tribunalov: opyt MUTBYu // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107.
15. A. S. Smbatyan. Nuzhno li «spasat'» sistemu mezhdunarodnogo sudoproizvodstva ot fragmentatsii? // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107