Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Khachatryan, A. K. Relief from Criminal Responsibility for Tax Crime

Abstract: The subject under research: the article is devoted to the problems that may arise when applying the legal provision on relief from criminal responsibility for tax crime. The author of the article analyzes contradictory legislative texts established by the criminal law (Part 1 of Article 761 and Note 2 to Articles 198 and 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) and criminal procedure law (Article 281 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation). The author describes grounds and conditions for application of these legislative provisions as well as problems that may arise as a result thereto. In particular, the author analyzes the cases when a crime has been committed for the first time or the damage to the budget system has been recovered. The author describes contradictions between judicial practice and theory of the criminal law on the matter. The article is based on the technical method of analyzing the practice of the application of legal provisions about relief from criminal responsibility as set forth by Part 1 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the RF and Note 2 to Articles 198 and 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author also uses the statistical method for evaluating the efficiency of the application of these provisions. According to the author, the latest version of Part 1 of Article 761 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation fails to be efficient which is caused by such factors as the low efficiency of work performed by tax authorities to enforce collection of taxes and low efficiency of law-enforcement agencies investigating tax crime which leads to frequent expiration of the statute of limitations. Taking all these circumstances and factors into account, the author concludes that there is a certain need to improve the practice of tax administration to make provisions actually effective.


Keywords:

relief, criminal responsibility, crime, economic activity, tax crime, non-payment of taxes, insufficient payment, harm, sphere, budget system.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Shatilovich S. N. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po delam o pre-stupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti (stat'ya 761 UK RF) // Ugolov-noe zakonodatel'stvo v XXI veke: sovremennoe sostoyanie, problemy traktovki i primeneniya ego polozhenii s uchetom zadach dal'neishego ukrepleniya ekonomiche-skogo pravoporyadka: mat. mezhdunar. nauch.-praktich. konf. / pod red. P. N. Pan-chenko, A. V. Kozlova. N. Novgorod, 2012.
2. Solov'ev O. G., Knyaz'kov A. A. Ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po delam o prestupleniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti (stat'ya 761 UK RF) // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2012. ¹ 7.
3. Smirnov G. Nalogovye prestupleniya: melochei ne byvaet // EZh-Yurist. 2011. ¹ 48.
4. Kostrova M. B. Yazykovaya forma ob''ektivatsii vzaimosvyazi ugolovnogo i ugo-lovno-protsessual'nogo prava // Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2014. ¹ 3.
5. Kibal'nik A. Ponimanie Plenumom Verkhovnogo Suda osvobozhdeniya ot ugolov-noi otvetstvennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2014. ¹ 1.
6. Kachalova O. V. O nekotorykh protsessual'nykh voprosakh primeneniya st. 761 UK RF v svete obratnoi sily ugolovnogo zakona // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 5.
7. Iskakov S. E. Problemy primeneniya norm o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh // Yuri-dicheskii mir. 2013. ¹ 10.
8. Gracheva Yu. V. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie v primenenii ugolovno-pravovykh norm: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. M., 2011.
9. Gladkikh V. I. Paradoksy sovremennogo zakonotvorchestva: kriticheskie zametki na polyakh Ugolovnogo kodeksa // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2012. ¹ 11.
10. Aleksandrov A. Prekrashchenie ugolovnogo presledovaniya po delam, svyazannym s narusheniem zakonodatel'stva o nalogakh i sborakh (st. 281 UPK) // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2010. ¹ 2.
11. Antonov A. G. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti po delam o prestup-leniyakh v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel'nosti // Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2013. ¹ 5.
12. Volkov K. A. Sovershenstvovanie pravosudiya po ugolovnym delam v otnoshenii predprinimatelei // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2013. ¹ 18.
13. Akopdzhanova M. O. Istoriya stanovleniya i razvitiya sovremennogo zakonoda-tel'stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii ob ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Nalogi. 2011. ¹ 4.
14. Shchepot'ev A. V., Naumov V. V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za sovershenie prestuplenii, predusmotrennykh stat'yami 198–1991 Ugolovnogo ko-deksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Pravo i ekonomika. 2012. ¹ 3.
15. T. M. Sekretareva. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti ogranicheniya prava na amnistiyu. // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2010. – ¹ 9.
16. Protopopova N.I.. Nalogovaya amnistiya kak institut ekonomicheskoi politiki gosudarstva: rossiiskaya praktika // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie. – 2008. – ¹ 3
17. Salkazanov A.E. Aktual'nye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov s organizatsii v RF (st.199 UK RF) // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2014.-3.-C. 336-342. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2014.3.11487.
18. Bukalerova L.A., Shel'menkova Ya.Yu. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti v svyazi s istecheniem srokov davnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2013.-9.-C. 910-916. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.8966.
19. Tokarchuk R.E. Obshchestvennaya opasnost' kak obshchii printsip ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 126-142. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_51.html
20. Antonova E.Yu. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' korporativnogo (kollektivnogo) sub''ekta za korruptsionnye prestupleniya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2013.-3.-C. 192-220. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.3.568. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_568.html
21. Salkazanov A.E. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' za uklonenie ot uplaty nalogov i (ili) sborov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i zarubezhnykh stranakh na primere otvetstvennosti organizatsii. // Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie.-2013.-11.-C. 852-859. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8688.2013.11.9961.
22. Kashkina E.V., Khandogina A.V. Administrativnyi nadzor za litsami, osvobozhdennymi iz mest lisheniya svobody: problemy pravoprimenitel'noi praktiki // Politseiskaya deyatel'nost'.-2013.-6.-C. 375-379. DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2013.6.10133.
23. Dolgikh I.P., Shebanov D.V. Ob optimizatsii ponyatiya "khishchenie" v rossiiskom zakonodatel'stve // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-5.-C. 23-37. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.5.11933. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_11933.html
24. M.O. Akopdzhanova Dispozitsii norm ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva Rossii o nalogovykh prestupleniyakh: voprosy razgranicheniya sostavov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-6.-C. 105-109
25. Bukalerova L.A., Shel'menkova Ya.Yu. K voprosu ob osvobozhdenii
26. ot ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti
27. v svyazi s istecheniem srokov davnosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 9. - C. 910 - 916. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.9.8966.
28. Nikiforov A.V. Polnomochiya nalogovykh organov pri primenenii otvetstvennosti za nalogovye prestupleniya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 11. - C. 1051 - 1057. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.11.9912.
29. Poleshchuk O.V. Sostoyanie legalizatsii dokhodov, dobytykh prestupnym putem, s uchetom deistvuyushchego ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2014. - 6. - C. 776 - 786. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.6.12061.
30. R. I. Peizak Osobennosti osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoi
31. otvetstvennosti v zakonodatel'stve stran
32. kontinental'noi pravovoi sistemy // Pravo i politika. - 2011. - 10. - C. 1679 - 1683.