'Measure in Culture: Development of the Category and Principle' Philosophy and Culture nbpublish.com
Eng
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Polischuk, V. I. Measure in Culture: Development of the Category and Principle

Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2014-9 in rubric "Philosophy and culture", pages 1355-1361.

Resume: There have been many researches of all kinds of notions and categories analyzing the role of these notions and categories in cognition and practical activity. However, not so much attention has been paid to measure although the importance of measure and proportion were recognized by philosophers long time ago. Ancient philosophers associated measure with the hidden feeling of the singularity of all. In the 20th century philosophers studied measure and focused on the quality and quantity, similarities and differences between them and assumed that the quantity and quality constituted the measure. When the measure as itself was analyzed, it was mostly the measures of object but not the category measure itself being studied. The present article provides the results of the historical and cultural research based on analytical, diachronic and comparative research methods. The measure has a double nature if we view it as the principle of human activity. On the one hand, measure is what is described by the quantity according to Aristotle. This is the metric function of measure. The other aspect of measure is the quality with reference to these or those features. This is the evaluation or axiatic function. Both of these functions, metric and evaluation ones, expressed different opinions of human on the surrounding world.

Keywords: measure, quality, quantity, proportion, human as a measure, axiatic function, metric function, activity, sense of proportion, immensity.

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.9.12633

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Aristotel'. Soch.: V 4 t. M., 1975. T. 1. S. 253.
Gegel' G. V. F. Nauka logiki: V 3 t. M., 1970. T. 1. S. 422.
Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. M., 1974. T. 1. S. 262.
Gurevich A. Ya. Kategorii srednevekovoy kul'tury. M., 1972. S. 50.
Gurevich P. S. Raskolotost' chelovecheskogo bytiya. M.: IF RAN, 2009. S. 5.
Larin Yu.V. Problema genezisa kul'tury // Problemy istorii kul'tury: Sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. 5. Nizhnevartovsk, 2008. S. 312.
Losev A. F., Shestakov V. P. Istoriya esteticheskikh kategoriy. M., 1964.
Materialisticheskaya dialektika: V 5 t. M., 1980. T. 1. S. 165167.
Polishchuk V. I. Kul'tura skvoz' prizmu ponyatiya mera // Kul'tura kak vid chelovecheskogo bytiya i poznaniya: sb. materialov Vserossiyskoy nauch. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem v IGPI im. P.P. Ershova. Ishim, 2013. S. 5457.
Romanova G. Ya. Naimenovanie mer dliny v russkom yazyke. M., 1975. S. 78.
Spirkin A. G. Soznanie i samosoznanie. M., 1972. S. 111.
Timofeev I. S. Operatsii scheta i izmereniya kak perekhody ot kachestva k kolichestvu v poznanii // Filosofskie nauki. 1962. 4. S. 69.
Filosofiya kul'tury. Stanovlenie i razvitie. SPb., 1998. S. 416.
Bollnow O. F. Mass und Vermessenheit des Menschen. Göttingen, 1962.
V.M. Rozin analiz skhem v filosofii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh (na materiale knigi E. svedenborga) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-1.-C. 9-16.
I.A. Nedugova Dialektika kul'tury i soznaniya: predmetnyy podkhod // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-5.-C. 52-60.
E.N. Struk Eksplikatsiya kategorii predel v sovremennoy filosofii // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-8.-C. 1077-1082. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.8.4883.
Yu.B. Mindlin Upravlenie sistemoy kachestva
na predpriyatii sfery uslug // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 111 - 114. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.01.12.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard