'Input of constitutionalism into the contents and dynamics of the political regime.' National Security / nota bene nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Poyarkov, S.Y. Input of constitutionalism into the contents and dynamics of the political regime.

Published in journal "National Security / nota bene", 2014-4 in rubric "System and interaction", pages 482-492.

Resume: Political regime is a functional characteristic feature of the political system from the standpoint of systemic analysis. However, the regime may not sustain itself, it requires contents, which is formed as means and methods of achieving its functional goals, as well as the functional goals of the political government. Constitutionalism allows for setting the parameters of this functioning and establishing the mechanism of political power based upon the stage of formation of its consistency. The problem of parity of methods of government in the dynamics of the political system is key to defining nature and contents of the political regime. The most important role in the studies belongs to the systemic analysis. This is a methodology of object studies based upon their reflection as systems and analysis of theses systems. Systemic analysis provides for clarifications of a complicated problem, its structuring within the system of targets and detailed goals. Choice of this approach was influenced both by the existing understanding of constitutionalism as a complicated multi-element and dynamic object of studies, which is interrelated with the specific features of functioning of the political system as a whole, as well as getting acquainted with the scientific studies in the sphere of systemic analysis. Both democratic and authoritarian regimes are capable of functioning within the framework of constitutionalism. The marker of the level of functional development of a political regime is its closeness to the ideal of constitutionalism a constitutional state. Accordingly, the political practice of formation of constitutionalism reflects development of the constitutional regime outside the scope of formal requirements of the constitution of the state.

Keywords: constitutionalism, constitution, political regime, political government, democratic regime, authoritarian regime, power method, systemic analysis, state, civil society.

DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.4.11186

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
N. M. Dobrynin Razmyshleniya o problemakh stanovleniya pravovogo gosudarstva v Rossii. // Pravo i politika.-2012.-2.-C. 232-242.
Poyarkov S.Yu. Konstitutsionalizm kak osnova ratsional'noy politicheskoy sistemy sovremennogo obshchestva // Pravo i politika.-2013.-13.-C. 1882-1890. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.10094.
Dobrynin N.M. Kratkiy ocherk o sud'be rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma: o sushchnosti, evolyutsii i neotlozhnosti konstitutsionnoy reformy // Pravo i politika.-2013.-12.-C. 1737-1752. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10142.
Borisenkov A.A. Politicheskaya vlast' politicheskaya substantsiya // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-6.-C. 193-217. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.6.806. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_806.html
Gligich-Zolotareva M.V. Uvlechenie obshchimi mestami i tsennostnyy komponent konstitutsionalizma // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2013.-3.-C. 296-317. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.3.503. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_503.html
Borisenkov A.A. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya konstitutsiya o vlasti // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki.-2014.-1.-C. 19-44. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2014.1.10585. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_10585.html
Khlopin A. D. Rossiyskiy sotsium: granitsy obshchnostey i paradoksy ikh institutsional'noy integratsii // Forum 2003. Sotsium i vlast'. M. : Mysl', 2003. S. 6768.
Patrushev S. V. Vlast' i narod v Rossii: obnovlenie povsednevnykh praktik i varianty universalizatsii institutsional'nogo poryadka. M., 2003. S.4951.
Paneyakh E. L. Neformal'nye printsipy i formal'nye pravila: zakon deystvuyushchiy vs zakon primenyaemyy // Politicheskaya nauka. 2003. 1. S.37.
Kirdina S. G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. M. : TEIS, 2000. S.17.
Aristotel' Sochineniya. V 4kh t. T. 4. M. : Mysl', 1983. S. 488.
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi. M., 1992. S. 10.
Konstitutsiya Brazilii [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/563 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Konstitutsiya Kolumbii [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/48 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Macridis R. C. Modern Political Regimes. Patterns and Institutions. Boston, Toronto, 1986. P.5-6.
Khayek F. Pagubnaya samonadeyannost'. M. : Novosti, 1992. S. 112.
Tsitrin P. S. Zapadnaya demokratiya: osnovy stabil'nosti. Nauchnoanaliticheskiy obzor. M. : INION, 1990. S. 7, 15; Lijphart A. Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian Consensus Government in TwentyOne Countries. New Haven and London, 1984. P. 2136.
Konstitutsiya Argentinskoy respubliki [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/358 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Tsit. po: Machkuv E. Demokratiya, avtoritarizm, totalitarizm-ustarela li eta triada v uchenii o formakh pravleniya? // Rossiyskiy konstitutsionalizm: politicheskiy rezhim v regional'nom kontekste. Mezhregional'nyy seminar, Velikiy Novgorod, mart 2000g.: Sbornik dokladov. M.: Izd-vo Tsentra Konstituts. issled. MONF, 2000. S. 27-38.
G. O'Donnell. Delegative Democracy v: Larry Diamond/Marc F. Platter (Hrsg.), The Global Resurgence of Democracy, Baltimor/London, 1996 (2 izdanie). R.94-108.
Ibid. R.95.
Daymond L. Opredelenie i razvitie demokratii // Teoriya i praktika demokratii. Izbrannye teksty /Per. s angl. Pod red. V.L.Inozemtseva, B. G. Kapustina. M., 2006. S.2930.
Tokvil' A. Demokratiya v Amerike. M.: Progress, 1994. S.86.
Lipset S. M. Political Man. N.Y., 1960. P. 45.
Konstitutsiya Respubliki Pol'sha [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/112 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Konstitutsiya Meksikanskikh Soedinennykh Shtatov [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/51 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Lljphart A. Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in TwentyOne Countries. New Haven and London, 1984. P. 12.
Leyn Ya.E. Demokratiya i konstitutsionalizm // Polis. 1998. 6. S. 3249.
Tam zhe.
Issacharoff S. Constitutonalizing Democracy in Fractured Societies, Tex. L. Rev. 82, (2003-2004). R. 1861-1893.
Mel'vil' A. Yu. Demokraticheskie tranzity (teoretikometodologicheskie i prikladnye aspekty). M., 1999. S.17.
Murphy W. F. Constitution, Constitutionalism and Democracy // Constitutionalism and democracy: transitions in the contemporary world. Ed. by Douglas Greenberg & al. Oxford, 1993. P. 56.
Konstitutsiya Ispanskogo korolevstva [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/149 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Konstitutsiya Ital'yanskoy respubliki [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/148 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Osnovnoy zakon Federativnoy respubliki Germaniya [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/155 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Bondar' N. S. Konstitutsiya, konstitutsionnyy kontrol' i sotsial'nye protivorechiya sovremennogo obshchestva // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2003. 11. S.50.
Macridis R. C. Modern Political Regimes. Patterns and Institutions. Boston, Toronto, 1986. R. 12
A.V. Bezrukov, Rol' Prezidenta Rossii v mekhanizme realizatsii konstitutsionnykh printsipov federalizma, edinstva gosudarstvennoy vlasti i razdeleniya vlastey // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2013.-3.-C. 263-269. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.03.2.
Mackow J. Der Wandel des kommunistischen Totalitarismus und die postkommunistische Systemtransformation: Periodisierung, Problematik und Begriffe. // Zeitschrift fur Politikwissenschaft, Heft 4/1999, s.13471380, s.1349ff.
Macridis R.C. Modern Political Regimes. Patterns and Institutions. Boston, Toronto, 1986. P. 13; Nisbet R. Authoritarianism. Prejudices. A Philosophical dictionary. Cambr., L., 1982. P. 18.
Linz J.J. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. / Handbook of Political Science. Ed. by F.I. Greenstein, N.W. Polsby. Vol. 3. Macropolitical theory, Mass. etc., 1975. P. 264.
Shumpeter I. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. M., 1995. S. 321.
Shmitter. F. Budushchee demokratii: mozhno li rassmatrivat' ego cherez prizmu masshtaba? // Logos. 2004. 2. S.137156.
Konstitutsiya Shvetsii (Korolevstva Shvetsiya) [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/161 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Konstitutsiya Portugal'skoy respubliki [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL: http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/141 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Linz J. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore, L., 1978. P. 56.
Konstitutsiya Avstriyskoy respubliki [Elektronnyy resurs] // URL:http://worldconstitutions.ru/archives/160 (data obrashcheniya 17.10.2013).
Kochetkov V.V.. Russkie tsennosti i rossiyskaya Konstitutsiya 1993 goda. // Pravo i politika.-2013.- 13.-C. 1855-1865. DOI: .10.7256/1811-9018.2013.13.9736.
S. Yu. Poyarkov. Printsip razdeleniya vlastey v ideologii rossiyskogo konstitutsionalizma. // Pravo i politika.-2009.- 6

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard