Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Mamedov, N. M., Mansurova, S. E. The Nature and Essence of Human

Abstract: The authors of the article analyze meanings and definitions of the terms ‘human nature’ and ‘human essence’ and grounds for their development, generalization and convergence taking into account modern genetic, anthropological and cultural discoveries. Historically, differentiation of these two concepts was caused by the formation of the ‘nature and culture’ opposition during the Early Modern Period when it was believed that expansion of the cultural sphereled to narrowing of the sphere of nature and cultural degradation, on the contrary, resulted in the revival of nature. The authors of the article show to what degree the aforesaid conclusion can be related to the human himself and what grounds there are for creating the ‘savage (animal) and civilized human’ opposition. The article is based on philosophical and general scientific principles of monism and development, integrity and consistency, concepts of historicism, evolutionism and self-organization. The discovered contradiction between rather conservative human nature and his free and creative ‘essence’ dictates the discourse about the manageable evolution of human as an actor of self-development. Philosophical and anthropological terms ‘cultural adaptation’ and ‘cultural evolution’ are described as a typological factor of human self-development. In fact, the authors describe the path to creating a new humanism — the goal UNESCO has been actively calling the world community for.


Keywords:

human nature, human essence, generic human, individual, personality, culture, human ecology, post-human history, humanism, trans-humanism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. I.V. Egorova Pedagogicheskaya antropologiya I. Kanta // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2011.-1.-C. 15-25.
2. A.A. Razin Etnokul'tura: mesto i rol' v stanovlenii tselostnogo cheloveka. Chast' 1 // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-12.-C. 23-37.
3. A.A. Razin Etnokul'tura: mesto i rol' v stanovlenii tselostnogo cheloveka. Chast' 2. Okonchanie // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-1.-C. 58-75. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.01.7.
4. V.A. Kutyrev Rekonstruktsiya cheloveka // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-1.-C. 61-66.
5. E.M. Spirova Filosofskaya antropologiya kak sistema ponyatiy. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-11.-C. 128-137.
6. Sel'e G. Stress bez distressa-M.: Progress, 1982. – S.112
7. Mamedov N.M. Priroda cheloveka i gumanizm.// Etnopsikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Vyp.3, M.-Spb.2013
8. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. – M.: Progress, 1980. – S.205.
9. Khaken G. Samoorganizuyushcheesya obshchestvo. // Budushchee Rossii v zerkale sinergetiki. M.: KomKniga/URSS, 2006. – S. 207
10. Moiseev N.N. Chelovek vo Vselennoy i na Zemle.// Mnogomernyy obraz cheloveka: Kompleksnoe mezhdistsiplinarnoe issledovanie cheloveka. – M.: Nauka, 2001. – S.60
11. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. – M.: Progress, 1980. – S. 267
12. Deklaratsiya Zemli (Khartiya Zemli) – Parizh, Yunesko. – 2000.
13. Dubrovskiy D.I. Soznanie, mozg, iskusstvennyy intellekt. M., «Strategiya-Tsentr», 2007.
14. Khaydegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoy doroge. M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1992.-S. 106.
15. Fukuyama F. Nashe postchelovecheskoe budushchee: Posledstviya biotekhnologicheskoy revolyutsii – M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo ACT»: OAO «LYuKS», 2004. – S.7.
16. Pechchei A. Chelovecheskie kachestva. – M.: Progress, 1980. – S. 54
17. Moiseev N.N. Byt' ili ne byt'... chelovechestvu? – M., 1999.
18. Kholliner V. Chelovek i agressiya. M ., 1975.-S . 109.
19. Khaskin V. V. Uyazvimost' roda chelovecheskogo: ekologiya i krizis tsivilizatsii // Ekologiya i zhizn'. – 2007. – ¹ 6. – S. 77-80
20. Watters Ethan. DNA is not destiny: the new science of epigenetics rewrites the ules of disease, heredity, and identity. 2006. November. Vol.
21. No. 11. 27.Wilson E.O. On Human Nature. Cambridge (MA), 1978.P. 167.
22. Sorokin P.A. Chelovek i obshchestvo v usloviyakh bedstviy: Vliyanie voyny, revolyutsii, goloda, epidemii na intellekt i povedenie cheloveka, sotsial'nuyu organizatsiyu i kul'turnuyu zhizn'/ Per. s angl., vstup. st. i primech. V.V. Sapova. – SPb.: Mir, 2012.
23. Markov A. Evolyutsiya cheloveka: obez'yany, neyrony i dusha.-M.: Astrel', 2011
24. Efroimson V.P. Genetika etiki i estetiki.-SPb: «Talisman»,1995.
25. Lorents K. Agressiya (tak nazyvaemoe zlo). M.-2009.
26. Fesenkova L. V. Teoriya evolyutsii i ee otrazhenie v kul'ture. – M., 2003. – S. 153
27. Freyd Z. Vvedenie v psikhoanaliz. SPb.: Piter.-2007.
28. Gilad Y., Rosenberg S., Przeworski M. et al. Evidence for positive selection and population structure at the human mao-a gene // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002. V. 99. P. 862–867.
29. Erlik S.N. Biofilosofiya i chelovekoznanie// Biofilosofiya. – M., 1997.
30. Lumsden C.J. Does Culture Need Genes? // Ethology and Sociobiology. 1989. N 10. P. 11-28.
31. Mansurova S.E. Integratsiya znaniy o cheloveke kak teoreticheskoe osnovanie gumanizatsii obrazovaniya: Monografiya. – M.: GAOU VPO MIOO, 2012.
32. Ashley Montagu, Man and Aggression (New York, 1968), 9.
33. Dobzhansky Th. Evolution and Man's Self-Image // Evolution Anthropology, Physical. London, 1975. P. 189–220.
34. Tul'chinskiy G.L. Novaya antropologiya: lichnost' v perspektive postchelovechnosti. //Voprosy filosofii, 2009. – ¹4. – S.41-56
35. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya cheloveka. Ch. 1. M.: IF RAN, 2001.
36. Talhelm et al. Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained By Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture. Science 9 May 2014: Vol. 344 no. 6184 pp. 603-608
37. Mamedov N.M. Priroda cheloveka i smysl kul'tury.// Kul'tura ustoychivogo razvitiya: ot idei k real'nosti. Baku, 2013
38. Sharden T.P. Fenomen cheloveka – M.:Nauka, 1987
39. Stepin V.S. Kul'tura // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T.2. M., 2001.-S.341
40. Byars, S. G.; Ewbank, D.; Govindaraju, D. R.; Stearns, S. C. "Natural selection in a contemporary human population". PNAS 107 (suppl_1): 1787–1792.
41. Teyyar de Sharden. Fenomen cheloveka. M.: Nauka, 1987.-S. 178.
42. Yankovskiy N. K., Borinskaya S. A. Lyudi i ikh geny: niti sud'by. – M., Izd-vo «Vek 2», 2006
43. Yung K.G. Problemy dushi nashego vremeni. M.: "Progress", 1994.-S.185
44. Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977. – S.102
45. Kant, I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. / I.Kant – M., Mysl', 1966. (Filosof. nasledie). – T. 6 – S.350
46. Khomich E.V.Chelovek // Istoriya filosofii: Entsiklopediya.— Mn.: Interpresservis; Knizhnyy Dom. 2002.— S. 1247
47. I.V. Egorova V. Gumbol'dt o filosofskom obraze cheloveka // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2011.-4.-C. 26-37.
48. Shilovskaya N.S. Chelovek kak sub'ekt, bytie i bytie sub'ekta v istorii i sovremennosti // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2012.-¹ 1.-S.171-203. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.1.88. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_88.htm