Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Dzhimbeeva D.V. Trends of Conflict Regulation of Obligations Arising From Unjust Enrichment

Abstract: The article analyzes the various approaches to the definition of the law applicable to the obligations arising from unjust enrichment, in the legislation and the doctrine of foreign countries for example, the UK, Germany, USA and Switzerland. An overview of the main collision connections for the regulation of the researched obligations, which are contained in the foreign legislation, acts of regional codification of private international law is provided. The author examines the provisions of the law applicable to the obligations arising from the unjust enrichment in the above mentioned rules of law and makes a comparative legal analysis by examining the existing foreign doctrines and materials of foreign judicial practice on cross-border disputes for recovery of unjust enrichment. Similarities and differences of the considered models of collision regulation are identified.


Keywords:

unjust enrichment, the applicable law, collision rules, lex causae condictionis, models of conflict regulation, collision connecting factor, unjust enrichment obligations, the most intimate connection, the statute unjust enrichment, the problem of choice of law.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Novak D.V. Neosnovatel'noe obogashchenie v grazhdanskom prave. M.: Statut, 2010 // SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
2. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Inostrannoe zakonodatel'stvo// Predisl.: A.L. Makovskiy; Sost.: A.N. Zhil'tsov, A.I. Muranov. M.: Statut, 2001.
3. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu RF, chasti tret'ey (postateynyy). 3-e izd. Pod red. N.I.Maryshevoy, K.B.Yaroshenko. «KONTRAKT». «INFRA-M». 2010. SPS «Konsul'tant Plyus».
4. Raape L. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Per. s nem. M.A.Gurvicha. Pod red. L.A. Luntsa. M.1960.
5. Ahern John, Binchy William. The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations: A New International Litigation Regime. 2009.
6. Anton A. Private International Law. 2nd ed. Edinburgh.1990.
7. Bennet T.W. Choice of Law Rules in Claims of Unjust Enrichment. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Jan., 1990).
8. Blaikie J. Unjust Enrichment in the Conflict of Laws // Juridical Review. 1984.
9. Burrows A. The Law of Restitution. 3rd ed. Oxford University Press. 2011.
10. Dicey and Morris. Conflict of laws. London. 8th ed. 1967.
11. Dirk Looschelders. Internationales Privatrecht. Springer DE, 2004.
12. Ehrenzweig A. Restitution in the Conflict of Laws: Law and Reason versus the Restatement Second // 36 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 1297 (1961).
13. Gutteridge H.C., Lipstein K. Conflicts of Law in Matters of Unjustifiable Enrichment // The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1 (1939).
14. James G. McLeod. The Conflict of Laws. Calgary. 1983.
15. Jan Kropholler. Internationales Privatrecht: einschliesslich der Grundbegriffe des internationalen Zivilverfahrensrechts. 6. Auflage. Mohr Siebeck Tubingen. 2006.
16. Leslie R. Unjustified Enrichment in the Conflict of Laws // 2 Edinburgh Law Review 233 (1998).
17. Panagopoulos G. Restitution in Private International Law. Hart Publishing. Oxford Portland-Oregon. 2000.
18. Peter Hay. Unjust Enrichment in the Conflict of Laws: A Comparative View of German Law and the American Restatement 2d.
19. Peter Hygh. Autonomy in International Contracts. Clarenden Press. Oxford. 1999