'Authenticity as a necessary characteristic feature of evidence used in administrative jurisdictional process.' Administrative and municipal law nbpublish.com
Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Nobel, A.R. Authenticity as a necessary characteristic feature of evidence used in administrative jurisdictional process.

Published in journal "Administrative and municipal law", 2014-6 in rubric "Administrative process and procedure", pages 569-573.

Resume: The article concerns characteristic features of evidence in the administrative offences cases, the author substantiates the position that authenticity is a necessary legal quality of evidence along with its relevance and admissibility, characterizing the elements of its nature. Stating authenticity, relevance and admissibility of evidence manifests the formation of evidence as a legal category and possibility for its use in the legal process in order to establish the circumstances, which are relevant for the case. The article singles out the interrelation between authenticity and admissibility, specific features of checking authenticity at various stages of the proceedings in an administrative offence case. The methodological basis for the studies involves general scientific methods (dialectic material, analysis, and synthesis) and specific scientific methods ( systemic-structural, comparative legal, statistical, formal legal) scientific cognition methods. The article includes definition of the terms: characteristic features of evidence, authenticity, relevance and admissibility of evidence. Based upon the study the author makes a conclusion that only the combination of formal examination and free evaluation at various stages of cognition may guarantee adequate studies of the authenticity of the evidence. The first stage of examination is evaluation of procedural form, and the second includes analysis of the contents of the evidence in order to establish the logical propriety, clarity and comprehensive character of the provided data.

Keywords: evidence, characteristic features of evidence, qualities of evidence, nature of evidence, relevance of evidence, admissibility of evidence, authenticity of evidence, evaluation of evidence, proof, definition of evidence.

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.6.11358

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
S. V. Lyashkov Sudebnaya praktika kak sredstvo dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2012.-4.-C. 696-704.
V. G. Ul'yanov Obyazatel'no li uchastie ponyatykh pri proizvodstve sledstvennykh deystviy? // Pravo i politika.-2012.-6.-C. 1093-1097.
Zagrivko D.S. Printsipy osushchestvleniya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii // Pravo i politika.-2014.-2.-C. 181-186. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.2.6738.
Terekhov A.Yu. K voprosu ob osnovaniyakh vybora sposoba sobiraniya dokazatel'stv v khode dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnomu delu // NB: Rossiyskoe politseyskoe pravo.-2013.-2.-C. 62-76. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4218.2013.2.802. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pm/article_802.html
O. P. Nikitina Sudebnyy osmotr dokumenta kak metod proverki dostovernosti zayavleniya o fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Pravo i politika.-2012.-9.-C. 1587-1601.
Chushkin S.I. Istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti dorozhnogo dvizheniya: Diss. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2007.
Sheyfer S.A. Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie po ugolovnym delam: problemy teorii i pravovogo regulirovaniya
Rebets K.V. Dokumenty kak istochniki dokazatel'stv po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2009.
Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Chast' obshchaya / Otv. red. N.V. Zhogin. M., 1966.
Pobedkin A.V. Ugolovno-protsessual'noe dokazyvanie. M., 2009.
Orlov Yu.K. Osnovy teorii dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom protsesse. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2000.
Kurylev S.V. Sushchnost' sudebnykh dokazatel'stv // Tr. Irkutskogo un-ta. T. 17. Irkutsk, 1956.
Kostenko R.V. Teoreticheskie, zakonodatel'nye i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty ponyatiya ugolovno-protsessual'nykh dokazatel'stv. Krasnodar. 2005.
Gorskiy G.F., Kokorev L.D., El'kind P.S. Problemy dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Voronezh, 1978.
Dodin E.V. Dokazatel'stva v administrativnom protsesse. M., 1973.
Kipnis N.M. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1995.
Vladimirov L.E. Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatel'stvakh. Tula, 2000.
Vasil'ev F.P. Dokazyvanie po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii: Diss. dokt. yurid. nauk.-M., 2005.
Belkin A. R. Teoriya dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Norma, 2007.
Belkin R.S. Sobiranie, issledovanie i otsenka dokazatel'stv. Sushchnost' i metody. M.,1966.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard