Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Gubarets, D.P. The Lisbon Treaty: formation of the EU competences in the sphere of common foreign policy and security policy

Abstract: The article contains analysis of the changes in the procedure of formation of the EU competences in the sphere of common foreign policy and security policy. It is stated that the tendency within these changes is for the strengthening of the competence of the EU institutions. The author studies the specifi c features of distribution of competences among the Union, the Communities and the EU Member States in the sphere of common foreign policy and security policy. The author states that as a result of adoption and implementation of the Lisbon Treaty there was not merging between the fi rst and the second “pillars” , since while the European Union is very similar to the federal structure, it has no political integration, that is why there is still a threat that the foreign economic policy shall be bound by common foreign political interests. These interests are formed by specifi c states, and such decisions cannot be made at the supranational level. There is no fi xed framework for the “common foreign policy and security”, and their defi nition according to the general character of this sphere of activities is left at the discretion of the states.


Keywords:

the European Union, common foreign policy, security policy, competences of the EU, the Lisbon Treaty, the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, The EU Treaty, state, competences of the institutions of the Union, court.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Scannell D.L. Legal Aspects of the European Union's European Security and Defence Policy’, PhD Dissertation (2005), r. 47 and 247.
2. Cremona M. The Draft Constitutional Treaty: External Relations and External Action. 2003, p.40.
3. Gordanov I.B. Pravovye osnovy vneshnepoliticheskoy deyatel'nosti Evropeyskogo soyuza. Monografiya. M., 2009. S.109.
4. Dashwood A.A. Article 47 and the relationship between first and second pillar competences// Dashwood A.A. and Maresceau M. (eds). Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape. 2008, p.232.
5. Topornin B.N. Pravo i instituty Evropeyskikh soobshchestv na sovremennom etape: osnovnye ponyatiya//Evropeyskaya integratsiya: pravovye problemy. Kniga pervaya. M., 1992. S.17.
6. Eeckhout P. External Relations of the European Union: Legal and Constitutional Foundations (2004) r. 138.
7. Fardeeva I.N. Rol' sub'ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v prigranichnom sotrudnichestve s Evropeyskim Soyuzom. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2012.-¹ 1.-S.26-35. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2012.1.496. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_496.html
8. I. G. Pashkovskaya. Lissabonskiy dogovor: regulirovanie deyatel'nosti Evropeyskogo Soyuza v energeticheskoy sfere // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 8. – S. 104-107.
9. Postnikova E.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie priznaniya professional'nykh kvalifikatsiy v sfere predostavleniya uslug v Evropeyskom Soyuze // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.75-122. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.592. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_592.html
10. Razumov Yu.A. Nekotorye konstitutsionno-pravovoye osobennosti realizatsii norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v voennoy sfere v zarubezhnykh stranakh // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.171-183. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.684. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_684.html
11. Stepanenko V.S. Istochniki evropeyskogo ekologicheskogo prava. // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.161-183. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.4.10072. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_10072.html
12. Bayrektarevich A.. Future of Europe (of Lisbon and generational interval) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.16-26. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.4.9399. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9399.html
13. Kireeva N.V.. Ponyatie tselostnosti v sistemnoy teorii mezhdunarodnoy integratsii // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.11.10200.
14. Tsomaya M.A.. Evolyutsiya evrazes: politicheskie ambitsii ili ob'ektivnaya real'nost' // Trendy i upravlenie. – 2013. – ¹ 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.3.7582.
15. I. A. Kholov. Evraziyskiy Soyuz, problemy i perspektivy razvitiya // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107