Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International Law and International Organizations
Reference:

Shinkaretskaya G.G. Mixed criminal tribunals: a new type of justice?

Abstract: The article concerns mixed criminal tribunals, which in the opinion of the author represent the third generation criminal tribunals. The author studies the history of formation of the classic international criminal courts. The mixed (“hybrid”, “internationalized”) tribunals are the institutions, combining international legal institutions and the judicial institutions of the state, where the relevant crimes were committed. These tribunals involve foreign (they are often called international) and national judges, and their statutes also include norms of both national and international law. The author considers that the primary cause for the formation of mixed criminal tribunals is inefficiency of both national and international criminal tribunals in the investigation of international crimes. The mixed tribunals represent a rather f lexible form for guaranteeing due responsibility in the cases, when no other matters may achieve results. They are rather f lexible and they may work with various criminal defendants and various criminal acts.


Keywords:

international law, criminal law, national law, judicial system, mixed court, national court, international court, efficiency, hybrid, international crimes.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Iz'yatie iz kompetentsii sudebnykh uchrezhdeniy del, otnosyashchikhsya k vnutrenney kompetentsii gosudarstva // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 3.
2. G.G. Shinkaretskaya. Zapret zloupotrebleniya mezhdunarodnoy sudebnoy protseduroy kak faktor obespecheniya sudebnogo protsessa // Pravo i politika. – 2010. – ¹ 2.
3. R.A. Kalamkaryan, Yu.I. Migachev. Vseobshchaya Deklaratsiya prav cheloveka: rol' i znachenie v usloviyakh miroporyadka na osnove gospodstva prava Rule of Law. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107.
4. R.A. Kalamkaryan. Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka-60 let. Pozitiv mezhdunarodno-pravovogo opyta. // Pravo i politika. – 2008. – ¹
5. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
6. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyy ugolovnyy sud. // Pravo i politika. – 2002. – ¹ 6. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
7. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiyskoy Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoy zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
8. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeyskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiyskoy Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-¹ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.html
9. Ranchinskaya P.O.. Spetsifika vzaimodeystviya rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava v oblasti mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.10.9581.
10. A.S. Smbatyan. Perspektivy suda EvrAzES v sisteme organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – ¹ 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.7.
11. R. A. Kalamkaryan. Mezhdunarodnyy sud OON kak administrativno-pravovoy organ mirovogo soobshchestva po mirnomu razresheniyu mezhdunarodnykh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – ¹ 2
12. Strohmeyer H. Collapse and Reconstruction of a Judicial System: The United Nations Missions in Kosovo and East Timor//AJIL (2001) , v. 95, p. 46.
13. Romano C. Mixed Jurisdictions for East Timor, Kosovo, Sierra Leone and Cambodia: The Coming of Age of Internationalized Criminal Bodies?// The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence. v. 2, 2002, p.97–138.
14. Romano C., Nollkaemper A., Kleffner J . (eds) Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia. Oxford, 2004.
15. Sriram C.L. Globalising Justice: From Universal Jurisdiction to Mixed Tribunals//Northern Quaterly of Human Rights, v.22, 2004, p.12.
16. Dickinson L. The Relationship between Hybrid Courts and International Courts: The Case of Kosovo//American Journal of International Law, v.97, 2003, p. 309.
17. Linton S. Cambodia, East Timor and Sierra Leone: Experiments in International Justice //Criminal Law Forum, v.12, 2011,p. 185
18. R. A. Gurbanov Evropeyskaya sudebnaya set' i Evroyust kak osnovnye sub'ekty sotrudnichestva organov pravosudiya
19. gosudarstv-chlenov ES v sfere
20. ugolovnogo pravosudiya. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2011. - 4. - C. 113 - 120.
21. Sazonova K.L. K voprosu o sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnykh prestupleniy
22. gosudarstva, norm jus cogens i obyazatel'stv erga omnes
23. v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave // Pravo i politika. - 2013. - 9. - C. 1175 - 1181. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.9.9410.
24. V. A. Oganesyan Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov po pravam cheloveka
25. kak osobyy istochnik razvitiya i soblyudeniya
26. printsipov ugolovnogo pravosudiya // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. - 2012. - 1. - C. 65 - 71.