Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Bairektarevich, A. Multiculturalism is D(r)ead in Europe

Abstract: There is a claim currently circulating the European Union (EU), both cynical and misleading: ‘multiculturalism is dead in Europe’. No wonder, as the conglomerate of nation-states/EU has silently handed over one of its most important debates – that of European identity – to the left and right wing parties, recently followed by several selective and contra-productive foreign policy actions. Europe’s domestic cohesion, its fundamental realignment, as well as the overall public standing and credibility within its strategic neighborhood, lies in the reinvigoration of its everything but institutions transformative powers – stipulated in the Barcelona process of the European Neighborhood Policy as well as in the Euro-Med partnership (OSCE). There is a claim currently circulating around the European Union (EU), both cynical and misleading: ‘multiculturalism is dead in Europe’. No wonder, as the conglomerate of nation-states/EU has silently handed over one of its most important debates – that of European identity – to the left and right wing parties, recently followed by the several selective and counter-productive foreign policy actions.


Keywords:

information war, geopolitics, multikulturalism, conflicts management technologies, political conflicts, the international safety, the international relations, politica, interests, nation-state.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Tkhor V.V.. Britanskaya musul'manskaya identichnost' v usloviyakh mul'tikul'turalizma. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 1.-C. 89-98. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.9815.
2. Bayrektarevich A.. Future of Europe (of Lisbon and generational interval) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 16-26. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.4.9399. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9399.html
3. Bayrektarevich A.. Future of Europe (of Lisbon and generational interval) // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 16-26. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.4.9399. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9399.html.
4. Manoylo A.V. Models of Information and Psychological Operations Used in International Conflicts // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-3.-C. 18-39. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.3.9091. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9091.html
5. Manoylo A.V. World Models and Technologies of Psychological Impact to Resolve International Conflicts // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 1-15. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.4.9400. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9400.html
6. Petrenko A.I. A number of peculiarities of information-psychological influence during carrying out operations of information-psychological warfare // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 47-60. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2013.4.9417. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_9417.html
7. Mulgan, G. (2006) Good and Bad Power: the ideals and betrayals of government. London: Penguin Books
8. Wright, L. (2007) The Looming Tower: Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11. New York: Vintage Books.
9. Future Conflict Studies (2009) Understanding Human Dynamics. Report of the US Defense Science Board Task Force, March.
10. Huntington, S.P. (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
11. Kymlicka, W. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Maalouf, A. (1984) Les Croisades vues par les Arabes [The Crusades through Arab Eyes]. New York: Schoken Books.
13. Diamond, L. (2008) The Spirit of Democracy – the Struggle to Build Free Societies throughout the World. New York: Times Books/Henry Holt.
14. Freedom House (2011) Freedom in the World 2011 – the Authoritarian Challenge to Democracy. Annual Report. Freedom House, Washington, DC.
15. Freedom House (2012) Freedom in the World 2012 – the Arab Uprising and their Global Repercussions. Annual Report. Freedom House, Washington, DC.
16. Cleveland, W.L. (2000) A History of the Modern Middle East. Oxford: Westview Press.
17. Bajrektarevic, A. (2011) Libya– The Unbearable Lightness of Being, Africa, Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 3(1), 72.
18. Bowen, J.R. (2011) Europeans against Multiculturalism (Nicolas Sarkozy joins David Cameron and Angela Merkel View that Multiculturalism Has Failed), Boston Review, July/August, 1-6.
19. Kiyashchenko N.I.. Nulevaya identichnost'. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 12.-C. 1747-1756. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.10317.
20. Kuznetsov Yu.V., Mul'tikul'turalizm i zapret argumenta ad hominem v nauchnoy diskussii. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 476-487. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.04.6.
21. A.S. ogly Alekperov. Mul'tikul'turalizm v prostranstve mezhdu politikoy i kul'turoy. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 3.-C. 350-355. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.03.8.
22. O.I. Stavtseva. Dialog kul'tur na fone krizisa mul'tikul'turalizma. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 9.-C. 173-179.
23. G. Yu. Filimonov. Mul'tikul'turalizm v SShA i Evrope: polittekhnologii v deystvii. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-¹ 2.-C. 62-72.
24. A.A. Gezalov. Proyavlenie sotsiokul'turnykh protivorechiy v nelineynom globaliziruyushchemsya mire i puti ikh preodoleniya. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2012.-¹ 2.-C. 71-79.
25. P.S. Gurevich. Mul'tikul'turalizm. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2009.-¹ 3.