Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Savchenko, D.A. “No property for the traitor”: responsibility for aiding an enemy according to the Pskov Judicial Charter

Abstract: The article concerns grounds and contents of responsibility for treason (perevet) as a first public crime mentioned in the acts of ancient Russian law. It is noted that treason was understood as secret informational and other assistance to an enemy of the Pskov city community. The evidence of guilt of a traitor was first of all correspondence with the enemy. Treason was a public state crime in a sense, that it was an encroachment upon the security interests of the entire publicly organized Pskov community. Punishments to the traitors (hanging or throwing off a bridge) were traditional for the veche and Princes justice of the North-Western Russia and it was regulated by a legal custom. At a Christian time the capital punishment (hanging or burning) for treason was sanctioned by the City Law, as included in the Book of the Helmsman. The article analyzes the text of the Pskov Judicial Charter and the chronicles, which mention punishments of the traitors. The provisions of the Pskov Judicial Charter are regarded in connection with the legal customs of the Ancient Rome and medieval China. The conclusion was made that the requirement of the Pskov Judicial Charter of “no property for the traitor” did not introduce treason as a new type of crime, and it did not establish capital punishment as a novel type of punishment. At the same time it regulated proprietary consequences of treason. The Pskov Judicial Charter provided that a criminal lost title to his property (zhivot), which was transferred to the city community. It made it impossible for the traitor to ransom himself out of capital punishment or transfer the property to his heirs. That is why treason and other types of crimes to which the rule of “no property” applied were singled out as a separate category and their legal consequences were quite similar to the “unforgivable” crimes of the Chinese medieval law and the “heritage” crimes of the Ancient Rome.


Keywords:

ancient Russian law, the Pskov Judicial Charter, the public crimes, perevet, treason, information assistance to the enemy, zhivot, capital punishment, property, responsibility.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alekseev Yu. G. Pskovskaya sudnaya gramota i ee vremya. L., 1980. – 243 syu.
2. Bartoshek M. Rimskoe pravo: (ponyatiya, terminy, opredeleniya). M., 1989. – 448 s.
3. Benemanskiy M. O Proxeipoc nomoc imperatora Vasiliya Makedonyanina. Ego proiskhozhdenie, kharakteristika i znachenie v tserkovnom prave. Vyp. 1. Sergiev Posad, 1906. – 563 s.
4. Drevnee Khorvato-Dalmatskoe zakonodatel'stvo. Odessa, 1868. – 170 s.
5. Dydynskiy F. M. Latinsko-russkiy slovar' k istochnikam rimskogo prava: Po izdaniyu 1896 g. M., 1998. – 560 s.
6. Zakony velikoy dinastii Min so svodnym kommentariem i prilozheniem postanovleniy (Da Min lyuy tszi tsze fu li). Per. s kit., issled., primech. i prilozh. N.P.Svistunovoy. Ch.1. M., 1997 – 576 s.
7. Labutina I. K. Istoriko-topograficheskiy kommentariy k pskovskoy sudnoy gramote // Pskovskaya sudnaya gramota i rossiyskaya pravovaya traditsiya. Trudy mezhregional'noy nauchnoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 600-letnemu yubileyu Pskovskoy sudnoy gramoty. Pskov, 1997. S. 21–26.
8. Lyubker F. Real'nyy slovar' klassicheskikh drevnostey. M., 2007. CD-ROM.
9. Martysevich I. D. Pskovskaya sudnaya gramota. Istoriko-yuridicheskoe issledovanie. M., 1951. – 208 s.
10. Ospennikov Yu. V. Perevet i podzhog v drevnerusskom prave // Pravo i politika. 2008. ¹ 6.-S. 1517–1520.
11. Ospennikov Yu. V. Pravovaya traditsiya Severo-Zapadnoy Rusi XII–XV vv. M., 2007. – 549 s.
12. Pamyatniki rossiyskogo prava. V 35 t. T. II. Pamyatniki prava udel'noy Rusi. M., 2013. – 408 c.
13. Pskovskie letopisi. Vyp. 1. M., 1941. – 148 s.
14. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X–XX vekov. V 9 t. T. 1. Zakonodatel'stvo Drevney Rusi. M., 1984. – 432 s.
15. Savchenko D.A. «Gosudaryu khoteti dobra vo vsem»: prisyaga poddannykh moskovskomu tsaryu (nachalo XVII veka) // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2013. ¹ 8. S. 940–946.
16. Savchenko D. A. Obzor russkogo i litovsko-russkogo zakonodatel'stva XVII veka ob otvetstvennosti za gosudarstvennye prestupleniya. Novosibirsk, 2013. – 202 s.
17. Slovar' drevnerusskogo yazyka (XI–KhIV vv.): V 10 t. T. 6. (ovad' — poklasti). M., 2002 – 602 s.
18. Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI–XVII vv. Vyp. 14. (Otrava – Personya). M., 1988.-311 s.
19. Sreznevskiy I. I. Slovar' drevnerusskogo yazyka. V 3 t. Reprintnoe izdanie. M., 1989. – 5237 s.
20. Ustryalov F. Issledovanie Pskovskoy Sudnoy gramoty 1467 g. SPb., 1855. – 194 s.
21. Khachaturov R. L. Mirnye dogovory Rusi s Vizantiey. M., 1988. – 136 s.
22. Chervonetskiy D. A. Gosudarstvennye prestupleniya po russkomu pravu. Yur'ev, 1913. – 80 c.
23. Shchegolev A. V. Zakon Yuliya ob oskorblenii velichiya v kodekse Yustiniana // Drevnee pravo. 1999. ¹ 1. S.108–115.
24. Engel'man I. Sistematicheskoe izlozhenie grazhdanskikh zakonov, soderzhashchikhsya v Pskovskoy sudnoy gramote. SPb., 1855. – 199 s.