Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Voronin M.V. Role of Primary Social Relations and its System Cooperation in the Comparative Legal Analysis

Abstract: The target of research is a system approach in the comparative analysis. The subject of the research is primary social relations and its system cooperation in comparative analysis. The primary social relations are the basis of the system of law of different legal systems and its studying may help to enlarge the comparative legal research, increase its representativeness and elicit genesis of system connections and cooperation of different legal systems. It will encourage the increase of the effectiveness of legal regulation and overcoming the insularity of legislative evaluation. The main issue in the methodologies of the research is methodological instruments of the common theory of systems based on the paradigm of common system of the world around. The source of methodological provision of the article is a system approach to research of law, which presume its apprehension in the context of structure, content and level aspects of cognition of law.


Keywords:

models of cooperation, law, methodology, comparative law, comparative legal analysis, primary social relations, social relations, cooperation, system, private legal relations.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Bekhruz Kh. N. Osnovy tsivilizatsionnogo podkhoda v sravnitel'nom pravovedenii. – Odessa: Feniks, 2007. – 64 s.
2. Gazizova R.G. Sovremennaya interpretatsiya islamskoy kontseptsii prav cheloveka // Sravnitel'noe pravovede-nie: Sbornik materialov / pod red. S.V. Kivalova. – Odessa: Feniks, 2013. – 352 s.
3. Voronin M. V. Osnovaniya i proyavleniya sistemnosti prava: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. – Kazan', 2013. – 223 s.
4. Voronin M. V. Kharakteristika pervichnykh obshchestvennykh otnosheniy, opredelyayushchikh sistemnost' chastnogo prava // Biznes v zakone. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 37–40.
5. Lafitskiy V. I. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v obrazakh prava. T. 1. – M.: Statut, 2010. – 429 s.
6. Lezhe R. Velikie pravovye sistemy sovremennosti: sravnitel'no-pravovoy podkhod. – M.: Volters Kluver, 2009. – 584 s.
7. Marchenko M. N. Evropeyskiy soyuz i ego sudebnaya sistema. – M.: Prospekt, 2012. – 288 s.
8. Okriashvili T. G. Chastnopravovye otnosheniya kak yuridicheskoe vyrazhenie rynochnoy ekonomiki // Biznes v zakone. – 2013. – ¹ 6. – S. 23–25.
9. Pravootnosheniya i ikh rol' v realizatsii prava: ucheb. posobie / nauch. red. Yu. S. Reshetov. – Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1993. – 104 s.
10. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: natsional'nye pravovye sistemy. T. 3. Pravovye sistemy Azii / pod red. V. I. Lafitskogo. – M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve RF, 2013. – 704 s.
11. Syrykh V. M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. – M.: Yustitsinform, 2012. – 704 s.
12. Khabrieva T. Ya., Tikhomirov Yu. A. Tvorcheskiy potentsial nauki // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. – 2010. – ¹ 10 (166). – S. 5–11.
13. Martynov A.V. Sovremennoe pravo i publichnoe upravlenie: problemy metodologii i sootnosheniya // NB: Ekonomika, trendy i upravlenie. – 2013. – 4. – C. 1–15. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_924.html
14. R. A. Gurbanov Perspektiva prisoedineniya Evropeyskogo soyuza k Evropeyskoy konventsii o zashchite prav che-loveka i osnovnykh svobod i vliyanie etogo prisoedineniya na otnosheniya organov pravosudiya Evropeyskogo soyuza i Soveta Evropy // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – 7. – C. 109–118