Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Smirnova M.G. Force Majeure in Russian, Foreign and International Law

Abstract: The existing Russian legislation, the domestic legislation of foreign countries and international law define the category "force majeure" in different ways, and also apply different terms to definition of the specified circumstances. In the present article was taken an attempt to make the comparative and legal analysis of the category "force majeure" at different levels of rules of law, based on the current legislation, legal literature and court practice.


Keywords:

force majeure, superable force, emergency, civil liability, fortuitous event, UNIDROIT Principles.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. A.Favre, in “Fault as an element of the illicit act”, Georgetown Law Journal (Washington DC), vol. 52, No. 3 (spring, 1964).
2. Adlercreutz, Axel (1991): Avtalsrätt II.3rd ed. Lund.
3. B&S Contracts and Design Ltd vs Victor Green Publications Ltd [1984] I.C.R. 419 (CA). Vitiation of Contracts: International Contractual Principles and English Law. Gareth Spark. Cambridge.
4. Case from ECJ, title unknown, 266/84 (1987) 3 CMLR 202, p. 223. Vitiation of Contracts: International Contractual Principles and English Law. Gareth Spark. Cambridge.
5. J.Fleming The Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Sidney, Law Book Company, 1971) str. 291.
6. R. Ago “La colpa nell’illecito internacionale”, Scritti giuridici in onore de Santi Romano (Padua, CEDAM, 1940), vol. 3
7. Swadling, William (1995): The judicial construction of force majeure clauses, str. 7. In McEndrick, Ewan: Force majeure and frustration of contract. 2nd ed. London. str. 3–19.
8. The long-term contract: Contract law and contracting. by Nystén-Haarala, Kauppakaari Oyj, Finnish Lawyers' Pub (1998), sm. http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/kuoppala2.html; http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/ kuoppala2.html#vi
9. The principles of European contract law and Dutch law: a commentary, Danny Busch, str.115, str.141.
10. Valsabbia v. Commission ECR [1980], p. 907. The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Jaha Raitio.
11. Yearbook of the International Law Commission. 1978, vol. II. Part One. Str. 67.
12. A.V. Venediktov. Dogovornaya distsiplina v promyshlennosti. Izdatel'stvo Leooblispolkoma i Lensoveta. Leningrad. 1935. S. 163–181.
13. B.S. Antimonov. Grazhdanskaya otvetstvennost' za vred, prichinennyy istochnikom povyshennoy opasnosti. M., «Yurid. Lit.». 1952. S. 127–191.
14. Voprosy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Sbornik 1. Pod red. Prof. M.M. Agarkova. Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Moskva-Leningrad. 1945.
15. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Chast' 1. SPS Konsul'tant plyus.
16. E.A. Pavlodskiy. Izbrannoe / Sostaviteli: Yu.N. Kashevarova, M.L. Shelyutto. – M.: Institut zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2010. – 160s., S. 56.
17. E.A. Pavlodskiy. Sluchay i nepreodolimaya sila v grazhdanskom prave. Moskva. «Yuridicheskaya literatura». 1978.
18. E.V. Passek. Neimushchestvennyy interes i nepreodolimaya sila v grazhdanskom prave. – M.; «Statut», 2003. – s. 399. (Klassika rossiyskoy tsivilistiki).
19. O.S. Ioffe. Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo. M., «Yurid. Lit.». 1975. S. 146–154.
20. Printsipy Evropeyskogo Dogovornogo 1998 g. SPS Konsul'tant plyus.
21. Rezolyutsiya General'noy Assamblei OON 56/589 ot 12.12.2001 g.
22. Slovar' Ozhegova, sm. http://ozhegov.slovaronline.com/%D0%A1/%D0%A1%D0%9B/32448-SLUCHAY
23. SPS Konsul'tant plyus. «Printsipy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh dogovorov (Printsipy UNIDRUA)» (1994 god).
24. SPS Konsul'tant plyus: Postanovlenie Trinadtsatogo Arbitrazhnogo Apellyatsionnogo suda ot 21.06.2013 po delu ¹ A21–8837/2012.; Postanovlenie Federal'nogo Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 20.06.2013 po delu ¹ A40–121133/12–151–930; Postanovlenie Federal'nogo Arbitrazhnogo Suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 05.02.2010 po delu ¹ A32–7947/2008–7/195;
25. Yuridicheskiya zapiski, izdavaemye Demidovskim' Yuridicheskim' Litseem' / Pod redaktsiey A.R. Svishchev-skogo, G.S. Fel'dshteyna, A. L. Feytag-Loringovena. 1911. Vypusk II/III (VIII/IX). S. 271–321