Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

Seleznev V.A. Particularities of the Mediation Institute in the Law of the Near Abroad States

Abstract: The article considers some problems connected with the mediation application as the most requested way of alternative dispute resolutions, as well as the mediation law regulation particularities in the near abroad states – the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Republic of Moldova. The problem questions of definition and application of the national law new institution – mediation is corresponding of it’s standards to native’s mental imaginations, negotiating culture definition, public trust to private mediators and court system prestige. Analysis of problems and mediation institute application perspectives related with determination of correlation between mediation and judicial remedy. Improvement of legislative acts about dispute resolution alternative methods, particularly mediation, should be performed in accordance with public necessity of this dispute resolution method. The tendency to dispute resolution in a judicial proceeding stipulates the advisability of providing a legislative framework for this kind of conciliation procedures such as court reconciliation that will assist to increase the reliance of the conflict parts to the dispute resolution procedure, social relationships harmonization.


Keywords:

alternative dispute resolution, mediation, principles of mediation, legal conflict, mediation agreement, civil procedure, enforcement proceedings, near abroad states, existing experience of foreign countries, judicial remedy.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters // Official Journal of the European Union. L 136, 24.5.2008, S. 3–8.
2. Bol'shova A.K. Kontseptsiya razvitiya zakonodatel'stva o nesudebnykh protsedurakh razresheniya sporov // Kon-tseptsii razvitiya rossiyskogo zakonodatel'stva. – M.: Eksmo, 2010. – s. 663.
3. Burkovskaya A.M. Institut mediatsii v Respublike Kazakhstan: problemy teorii i praktiki // Mirovoy sud'ya. 2011. ¹
4. S. 8–10. 4. Grazhdanskiy protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus' // Natsional'nyy reestr pravovykh aktov Respu-bliki Belarus'. 15.01.1999. ¹ 2/13.
5. Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 28.01.2011 ¹ 401-IV «O mediatsii» // Kazakhstanskaya pravda. 05.02.2011. ¹ 42–43.
6. Zakon Respubliki Belarus' ot 12.07.2013 ¹ 58–3 «O mediatsii» // Natsional'nyy reestr pravovykh aktov Respubliki Belarus'. 19.07.2013. ¹ 2/2056.
7. Zakon Respubliki Moldova ot 14.06.2007 ¹ 134-XVI «O mediatsii» // Monitorul Oficial. 2007. ¹ 188–191. St. 730.
8. Zakon Respubliki Moldova ot 17.06.2010 ¹ 113 «O sudebnykh ispolnitelyakh» // Monitorul Oficial. 2010. ¹ 126–128. St. 406.
9. Ispolnitel'nyy kodeks Respubliki Moldova ot 24.12.2004 ¹ 443-XV // Monitorul Oficial. 2005. ¹ 34–35.
10. Kamenkov V.S. Istoriya i ponyatie posrednichestva v khozyaystvennom sudoproizvodstve Belarusi // Arbitrazh-nyy i grazhdanskiy protsess. 2010. ¹ 9.
11. Lisitsyn V.V. Posrednichestvo i mediatsiya v Rossii: problemy stanovleniya i perspektivy razvitiya // Tre-teyskiy sud. 2012. ¹ 4.
12. Suleymenov M.K. Zakonodatel'stvo Respubliki Kazakhstan o mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe i me-diatsii // Treteyskiy sud. 2011. ¹ 4.
13. Federal'nyy zakon ot 27.07.2010 ¹ 193-FZ «Ob al'ternativnoy protsedure uregulirovaniya sporov s ucha-stiem posrednika (protsedure mediatsii)» // SZ RF. 2010. ¹ 31. St. 4162.
14. Khozyaystvennyy protsessual'nyy kodeks Respubliki Belarus' // Natsional'nyy reestr pravovykh aktov Respu-bliki Belarus'. 20.03.2001. ¹ 2/745