Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Parkhomenko, R. N. Russia and West: Law Against Morals?

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes similarities and differences in spiritual and legal spheres of life of Russia and Western countries, first of all, Germany. For example, the cultural singularity of Europe is well proved by the fact that it developed as an integral Catholic world after the failure of the Western Roman Empire. In Western European countries Church established the unified system of regulations and the common space of values. That process was autonomous and did not depend on nonreligious social institutions or government. This is what created pluralism in Europe and dependence of relations between different institutions and social organizations on legal regulations. In Russia the absence of the bourgeois class, insufficient development of the legal sphere and political immaturity of the population resulted in the ‘special’ path of our country and created a special position of Russia between the Western civil society and Oriental despotism. The author of the present research article in detail views different points of view on the problems of cultural and historical features of Russia compared to the West and concludes that in the course of the historical development Russia created its own specific version of liberalism when legal guarantees of personal freedom were replaced with humanist ideals including the ideal of ‘truth’. Therefore, a specific feature of the Russian mentality is that Russian liberal ideology and legal regulations are in many ways based on morals and moral appraisal.


Keywords:

Russia, West, Germany, right, freedom, morals, pluralism, state institution, church, liberalism.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Averintsev S. Vizantiya i Rus': dva tipa dukhovnosti // Novyi mir, 1988, ¹ 7, 9.
2. Valitskii A. Filosofiya prava russkogo liberalizma. M., 2012. S. 56.
3. Volkogonova O. «Russkaya ideya»: mechty i real'nost' // Yushenkov S.N. (pod red.) Postzapadnaya tsivilizatsiya. Liberalizm: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. M., 2002.
4. Gachev G.D. Mental'nosti narodov mira. M., 2008. S. 100.
5. Kara-Murza A.A. «Novoe varvarstvo» kak problema rossiiskoi tsivilizatsii. M., 1995.
6. Kara-Murza A.A. Primirenie Russkogo mira. Vozmozhen li vnutritsivilizatsionnyi dialog? // Guseinov A.A/A.A. Kara-Murza/A.F. Yakovleva. Russkii mir kak tsivilizatsionnoe prostranstvo. M., 2011.
7. Kapustin B.G. Moral' i politika v zapadnoevropeiskoi politicheskoi filosofii // Fedorova M.M./Kheveshi M.A. (pod red.) Ot absolyuta svobody k romantike ravenstva (Iz istorii politicheskoi filosofii). M., 1994.
8. Mezhuev V.M. «Russkaya ideya» i tsivilizatsionnye osobennosti Russkogo mira // Guseinov A.A/A.A. Kara-Murza/A.F. Yakovleva. Russkii mir kak tsivilizatsionnoe prostranstvo. M., 2011.
9. Piskunov V.M. 1994: Russkaya ideya. V krugu pisatelei i myslitelei russkogo zarubezh'ya. M., 1994. T. 2.
10. Stepin V.S. Tsennost' prava i problemy formirovaniya pravovogo obshchestva v Rossii // Barenboim P.D./Zakharov A.V. (pod red.) Filosofiya prava v nachale XXI stoletiya cherez prizmu konstitutsionalizma i konstitutsionnoi ekonomiki. M., 2010.
11. Stepun F.A. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo: izbrannye sochineniya. M., 2008.
12. Sulakshin S.S./Bagdasaryan V.E. i dr. (pod red.) Natsional'naya ideya Rossii. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii (Moskva, 12 noyabrya 2010 g.). M., 2011.
13. Pivovarov J. Der ungeliebte Liberalismus // Luks L./O’Sullivan D. (Hgg.) Russland und Deutschland im 19. Und 20. Jahrhundert: Zwei „Sonderwege“ im Vergleich. Köln/Weimar/Wien, 2001.
14. Gulyaikhin V.N. Pravovoi mentalitet rossiiskikh grazhdan // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2012. - 4. - C. 108 - 133. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2012.4.310. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_310.html
15. Parkhomenko R.N. B. Chicherin o prave i printsipe razdeleniya vlastei // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. - 2013. - 1. - C. 251 - 284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/lr/article_395.html