Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Churnosov, I.M. The concept of law by Ronald Dworkin

Abstract: The object of studies in this article is critical evaluation of the concept of law by the well known legal theoretician Ronald Dworkin. In the first part of the article the author studies his early works with special attention to the polemics between Dworkin and Hart. It is also explained how the defects of the early theory of Dworkin led to the radical changes in his methodology and the number of his theses. In the second part of the article the author focuses on legal views of Dworkin, as formulated after 1981. The author provides detailed description of his interpretation theory and his theory of the integrity of law. The third part of the article contains criticism of his views from the pluralism standpoint. The method of the author mirrors the method of Dworkin, and it is entitled “constructive interpretation”. Its use allows to imagine an object of studies in the best light, complicating its criticism. Ronald Dworkin was and still is one of the central pillars of the Western jurisprudence. Unfortunately, most of his works are not translated into Russia, but still his ideas need to be critically evaluated from the standpoint of their perspective application, as well as lack of inner contradictions by the Russian legal community. And the views of Ronald Dworkin contain many attractive idea, while the central thesis on integrity may be potentially dangerous for the very freedoms, which the law is meant to safeguard.


Keywords:

Law, Dworkin, law as an integrity, norms and principles, Hart, Raz, hermeneutics, interpretation theory, positivism, normative jurisprudence.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Simmonds, N. E. “Central issues in jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights”, London, Maxwell, 2008
2. Leibnits «Rassuzhdenie o metafizike», tsitiruetsya po knige S. A. Mal'tsevoi, D. Antiseri i Dzh. Reale «Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dnei. Ot vozrozhdeniya do Kanta», tom 3, str. 384-385, Pnevma
3. Tolstoi, L. «Voina i mir», Moskva, «Khudozhestvennaya literatura», 1980
4. Bibliya, Izdanie Moskovskoi patriarkhii, Moskva, 1983
5. Dworkin, R. “Law’s Empire”, London, Fontana, 1986
6. Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, st. 105, ch. 1, "Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 17.06.1996, N 25
7. Dworkin, R. “Taking rights seriously”, London, Duckworth, 1977
8. Raz, J. “Legal principles and the limits of law”, 81 Yale Law Journal, 1972
9. Hart, H. L. A. “The Concept of Law”, Oxford University Press, 2nd edition
10. Simmods, N. E. “Blutness and Bricolage” v “Jurisprudence: Cambridge Essays”, H. Gross, R. Harrison, New York, Oxford, 1996
11. Nitsshe, F. «Genealogiya morali», Sankt-Peterburg, «Azbuka-klassika», 2008
12. Leusenko D.A.. Integrativnaya teoriya i geneticheskii metod v poznanii prava B.A. Kistyakovskogo // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.12.10403.
13. Leusenko D.A.. Integrativnoe pravoponimanie i geneticheskii metod v yuridicheskoi nauke // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.11.10117.
14. D. I. Lukovskaya, A. A. Solov'ev. Pravovaya sistema: deyatel'nostno-integrativnyi podkhod // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107.
15. O. G. Nozikova. Pravovoi tekst kak ofitsial'nyi interpretatsionnyi akt. // Pravo i politika. – 2007. – ¹ 10.
16. V.M. Rozin. Diskursivnye kommunikatsii i sotsial'noe normirovanie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 11. – S. 104-107.
17. V. G. Grafskii. Pravovoe obshchenie v proshlom i nastoyashchem. // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – ¹ 1.
18. V. G. Grafskii. Pravo, moral' i politika v sotsiologizirovannoi yurisprudentsii P. A. Sorokina. // Pravo i politika. – 2000. – ¹ 2.
19. Palyulin A.Yu.. «Moral' i dogma» o zakone i spravedlivosti // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.9.9392.
20. Shermukhamedov S.. Tsennyi trud o filosofsko-pravovom uchenii Immanuila Kanta // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – ¹ 9. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.9.2341.
21. N. Fisher. «Moral'no-opredelennyi monoteizm» Kanta v svyazi s khristologiei (prodolzhenie) (perevod I.V. Kirsberga) // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – ¹ 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.05.11.
22. L.V. Maksimov. Chto takoe moral': problema opredeleniya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – ¹ 10. – S. 104-107