Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Avatkov, V.A., Badranov, A.Sh. The pan-Turkist aspect within the discourse of the modern Tatar national movement.

Abstract: The object of studies in this article includes national movements in the territory of the Russian Federation, and, more specifically, the Tatar national movement, which is one of the most active actors in the domestic political interactions in Russia. The ethnic political and federal development of the Russian Federation passed through the stage of separatist “sovereignty parade”, and as a result of the reform of “strengthening the government vertical” in early 2000, it is now characterized with the lower activity an role of national movements in the political discourse of national and territorial subjects of the Russian Federation. At the current stage in some regions national movement of the native peoples of these territories are out of the political arena due to degradation and discrediting of their ideas. In other regions these movements were transformed into other institutional forms, or their ideas gained new understanding among the national elites. The Republic of Tatarstan is quite interesting object to study from the standpoint of the ethnic and political development of the peoples of Russia. The main method of studies therefore is a systemic approach, allowing to include separate processes into the general global trends. The pan-Turkist ideology shows flexible mechanisms and forms of influence on the Tatar community. However, this ideology needs to address the basic postulates of the time of its genesis in some way. That is why the scientific and expert community of Russia should provide due evaluation to the “Idel-Urals” project as a radical theory provoking separatism in the Urals and Volga Region republics. Generally, the pan-Turkism is a complicated ideology, including various theoretical concepts and ideologems, which claims a rather large theory and a large number of ethnic groups. When this ideology is analyzed from the critical standpoint it becomes obvious that the pan-Turkist project is pragmatically used by Turkey. However, some politicians and public figures tend to evaluate implementation of pan-Turkist ideas as a revival of true national identity (for example, in the Bashkir and the Tatar national movements). However, the pan-Turkist ideology provides for a final goal of assimilation of all of the Turkic peoples into one super-ethnos based upon the Turkish nation, rather than providing only for cultural and political unity. In turn, it means that the Turkic peoples shall be destroyed as separate ethnic groups. At the age of globalization, when we face the choice among the paths for the development, we may not ignore geopolitical realities and threats. The ongoing global processes, fall of regimes under other regimes, victories of one ideology over another show the reform of the global structure and order. The national intellectuals of different peoples should be very careful when choosing concepts for the modernization of their ethnic groups, otherwise, there may be a situation when having “found their path for development” based on a certain ideological construction the entire peoples may become just mechanisms and instruments for the achievement of geopolitical goals of foreign states.


Keywords:

nationalism, Tatarstan, pan-Turkism, national movement, Turkism, globalization, security, national security, soft power, sovereignty.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Avatkov V.A., Badranov A.Sh. «Myagkaya sila» Turtsii vo vnutrenney politike Rossii // Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek. 2013. ¹2 (27). S. 5-10.
2. VTOTs provel miting u teatra im. Kamala // http://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/89496/
3. Chuvashskie flagi na dne pamyati i skorbi v Kazani // http://anticor-21.livejournal.com/267414.html
4. Ivanova V.V. Volk okhranyayushchiy i volk napadayushchiy// Bestiariy II. Zoomorfizmy Azii: dvizhenie vo vremeni. — SPb.: MAE RAN, 2012. S. 95-96.
5. Terekhov R.S. Vliyanie ideologii pantyurkizma na vneshnyuyu politiku Osmanskoy imperii i Turetskoy respubliki v XX veke: diss. … kand. ist. nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011. S. 184
6. Novye alfavity i starye problemy // www.fergananews.com/article.php?id=5079&print=1
7. Latinizatsiya uzbekskogo alfavita: kommentarii spetsialistov // www.fergananews.com/article.php?id=5118&print=1
8. Tatarstan ostavili bez latinits'y // http://lenta.ru/articles/2004/11/16/language
9. Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 noyabrya 2004 g. N 16-P // http://www.rg.ru/2004/11/23/tatar-yazyk-dok.html
10. Natsizm volzhskogo razliva // http://svpressa.ru/society/article/64977/
11. Sm.: D. M. Iskhakov Etnografiya tatarskogo naroda, Kazan', Magarif, 2004; D. M. Iskhakov Tatarskaya natsiya: istoriya i sovremennoe razvitie. Nauchnaya publitsistika. — Kazan', 2004
12. Orlova I.B., Etnizatsiya istoricheskogo znaniya v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh //Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, ¹ 10, Oktyabr' 2009, C. 126-135
13. Tam zhe.
14. Moskva-Kazan': tysyacheletie spustya // www.pravaya.ru/look/4520
15. Iskhakov R. L. Ideologema «Idel'-Ural» v svete kontseptsii «kul'turnogo gnezda». (K voprosu o pererastanii kul'turnogo gnezda v kul'turnyy tsentr) / R.L. Iskhakov // Dergachevskie chteniya-2011. Russkaya literatura: natsional'noe razvitie i regional'nye osobennosti: materialy X Vseros. nauch. konf. — Ekaterinburg, 2012. — T. 3. — S. 93.
16. Gilyazov I.A. Legion «Idel'-Ural». Predstaviteli narodov Povolzh'ya i Priural'ya pod znamenami «tret'ego reykha». – Kazan': Tatarskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo, 2005. – 383 s.
17. Ursul A.D. Natsional'naya ideya i global'nye protsessy: bezopasnost', ustoychivoe razvitie, noosferogenez // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2013.-2.-C. 1-66. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_541.html
18. V.L. Bunchuk Regional'naya politika federativnogo gosudarstva kak mekhanizm optimizatsii i sovershenstvovaniya federativnykh otnosheniy // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2012.-6.-C. 22-27.
19. Bocharnikov I.V. Fenomen patriotizma v mirovoy politicheskoy istorii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-4.-C. 513-518. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9271.
20. Kuznetsova A.I. Rol' natsional'noy identichnosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh na sovremennom etape // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2013.-2.-C. 185-191. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560Kh.2013.02.11.
21. Noyanzina O.E., Goncharova N.P., Maksimova S.G., Avdeeva G.C. Sovremennye vyzovy bezopasnosti: otsenka riska podverzhennosti ekstremistkim i terroristicheskim ugrozam v usloviyakh regional'nykh sotsiumov // NB: Natsional'naya bezopasnost'.-2012.-1.-C. 213-254. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0417.2012.1.92. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_92.html
22. K.A.Bogatyrev. Krymskie tatary i etnokonfentsional'nyy konflikt v regione v nachale XXI v.. // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2009.-¹ 12.
23. V.V Bublikov. Islamizatsiya Evropy kak sledstvie dekhristianizatsii i demograficheskogo krizisa. // Trendy i upravlenie.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 156-164. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2013.2.5328.
24. Yu.A. Razumov Odno iz napravleniy sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federatsii v sfere pogranichnoy deyatel'nosti s uchetom natsional'no-pravovoy implementatsii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-1.-C. 152-156. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.15.
25. // http://rus.ruvr.ru/2013_10_11/Djusen-Kaseinov-TJURKSOJ-nazivajut-JUNESKO-tjurkskogo-mira-9571/
26. V KFU otkrylsya Nauchno-obrazovatel'nyy tsentr izucheniya Turtsii //www.kpfu.ru/main_page?p_cid=25200
27. Dyusen Kaseinov: "TYuRKSOY nazyvayut YuNESKO tyurkskogo mira"
28. Mkrtychyan A.A. Pantyurkizm v geostrategii Turtsii na Kavkaze kak global'naya problema sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy (politologicheskiy analiz): diss. … dokt. polit. nauk. – M., 2003. S. 39-40
29. Ob'em turetskikh investitsiy v Tatarstan sostavil $2 mlrd // http://www.regnum.ru/news/1702492.html#ixzz2iYKsvC3z
30. Ofitsial'nyy sayt STM «Azatlyk»// http://azatliq.info/ru/news.
31. Informatsionnoe izdanie tatarskoy partii natsional'noy nezavisimosti «Ittifak» // http://azatlyk-vatan.blogspot.ru/.
32. Terekhov R.S. Vliyanie ideologii pantyurkizma na vneshnyuyu politiku Osmanskoy imperii i Turetskoy respubliki v XX veke: diss. … kand. ist. nauk. – Nizhniy Novgorod, 2011. S. 27.
33. Mukhammetdinov R.F. Zarozhdenie i evolyutsiya tyurkizma. – Kazan': izd.-vo «Zaman», 1996. S. 55-63.
34. Iskhakov R. L. Ideologema «Idel'-Ural» v svete kontseptsii «kul'turnogo gnezda». (K voprosu o pererastanii kul'turnogo gnezda v kul'turnyy tsentr) / R.L. Iskhakov // Dergachevskie chteniya – 2011. Russkaya literatura: natsional'noe razvitie i regional'nye osobennosti: materialy X Vseros. nauch. konf. – Ekaterinburg, 2012. – T. 3. – S. 91-98.
35. Informatsionnoe izdanie Vsetatarskogo obshchestvennogo tsentra (VTOTs) // http://tatar-centr.blogspot.ru/2012/07/blog-post_14.html.
36. Kh.V. Dzutsev, Yu.Yu. Sinelina. Rasprostranenie religioznogo techeniya vakhkhabizm v respublikakh Severo-Kavkazskogo Federal'nogo okruga Rossiyskoy Federatsii: etnosotsiologicheskiy analiz. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene.-2013.-¹ 1.-C. 88-122. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2013.01.9.
37. D.S. Ryazanov. Predstavlenie o sushchnosti "islamskogo gosudarstva" v knige Sayida Kutba "Vekhi na puti". // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2011.-¹ 9.-C. 44-50. DOI: .