Published in journal "Police activity", 2014-1 in rubric "Administrative activity of the police", pages 51-54.
Resume: The study of administrative procedural position of participants of the proceedings on administrative offences cases show that the problem of guaranteeing rights and lawful interests of a person in the administrative offence proceedings has several key aspects regarding the following: proceedings on administrative offence cases, application of administrative coercion measures in general; activities of the state regarding guarantees of rights and lawful interests of natural persons and legal entities in administrative legal sphere. The article notes special administrative responsibility subject, which has the same amount of rights with the subject that does not have these qualities. The methodological basis for the scientific article was formed by the modern achievements of the cognitive theory. In the process of studies the author used general philosophical, theoretical, empiric methods (dialectics, systemic method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), traditional legal methods (formal logic), methods used in specific sociological studies (statistic, expert evaluation, etc.). It is noted in the article that an official in the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation is a person, who permanently, temporarily or in accordance with special competence performs the functions of state representative, that is a person being provided within the procedure established by law with the administrative capacity towards the persons, who are not in service dependency with him, or the person performing organizational and administrative, or organizational and economic functions in the state bodies, municipal bodies, state and municipal organizations, and also in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, other armed forces and military formations of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: person, special, subject, law, influence, participant, responsibility, status, position, sanction.
Miroshnichenko Ya.V. Osobennosti administrativno-pravovogo statusa gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh tamozhennykh organov Rossiyskoy Federatsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 12. - C. 17 - 23.
Kupreev S.S. Pravovaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstva pri primenenii mer obespecheniya proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 4. - C. 70 - 75.
Kuleshov G.N., Mar'yan A.V. Administrativno-pravovoe regulirovanie informatsionnogo obespecheniya statusa gosudarstvennogo sluzhashchego kak sub'ekta administrativnogo prava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2010. - 7. - C. 26 - 34.
Studenikina M.S. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' dolzhnostnykh lits // Zakon.-1998.-¹ 9.
-M.: VNIISZ, 1965. 5. Matveev S.I. Ponyatie i vidy spetsial'nykh sub'ektov administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Kodeks RSFSR ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh: voprosy okhrany sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka.-Gor'kiy, 1985.
Dodin E.V. Sub'ekt administrativnogo prostupka // Uchenye zapiski. Vyp.
Gavrilenko D.A., Podupeyko A.A. Problemy administrativnoy otvetstvennosti spetsial'nykh sub'ektov // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost'. Problemy teorii i praktiki.-Minsk, 1996.
Biryukov M.N. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost' spetsial'nykh sub'ektov (po materialam, podvedomstvennym sovetskoy militsii): Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk.-M., 1981.
Berezina N.V. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i otvetstvennost' dolzhnostnykh lits // Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost': obshchie problemy i otraslevye osobennosti. Tezisy dokladov mezhvuzovskoy konferentsii molodykh uchenykh-yuristov.-Vladivostok, 1990.
Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard