×èòàòü ñòàòüþ 'The ethnogenesis of the Japanese people and the hypothesis of the Indo-European component.' â æóðíàëå International relations íà ñàéòå nbpublish.com
Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Cherevko, K.E. The ethnogenesis of the Japanese people and the hypothesis of the Indo-European component.

Published in journal "International relations", 2014-1 in rubric "Sociology of international relations", pages 126-141.

Resume: Formation of the Japanese language and the Japanese ethnos at a certain stage of social and cultural development of which there appeared a need for writing system, are two closely related problems. The Japanese studies traditionally used a hypothesis according to which the Japanese ethnos was formed due to the interaction of the Austronesian (Malay and Polynesian) aboriginal tribes for whom the “bell culture” was typical and the incoming Altai tribes, for whom the “sword culture” was typical during the first centuries A.C. in the Japanese isles. Accordingly, the Altai language superstratum overlapped with the Austronesian substratum, and the superstratum won during the hybridization. The influence of substratum was shown in the lexical and phonetic elements of the new language, which was also reflected in the law of open syllables, which was not typical for the language of the incomers, and the considerable limitation of the well-developed agglutination system, absence of the consonant conjunction at the start of the word, non-distinguishing the phonemes [R/L], and grammatically it showed itself in lack of numeral changes in counting suffixes and abundance of polite words.

Keywords: international relations, politics, Japan, ethnogenesis, language, culture, society, Indo-European peoples, security, values.

DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10079

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Starostin S. A. Altayskaya problema i proiskhozhdenie yaponskogo yazyka. M., 1981. S. 3, 116. Illich – Svitych. Etimologiya. M., 1968.
Arutyunov C. A. K otsenke roli migratsiy v drevney istorii Yaponii // Sovetskaya etnografiya. 1960. ¹1. S.60-67,
Ono Susumu. Nikhongo-no kigen (Proiskhozhdeniya yaponskogo yazy-ka). Tokio, 1970. S.139-145, 199;
Dzidaybetsu kokugo dzi-ten. Dzedaykhen (Slovar' otechestvennogo yazykoznaniya. Drevnost'). Tokio, 1971. S. 17;
Komatsu Isao. The Japa¬nese people. Origins of the people and the language. Tokyo. 1962. P.59:
Syromyatnikov H.A. Drevneyaponskiy yazyk. M., 1972. S 15:
Nikhongo-no rekisi, 1. Mindzoku-no kotoba-no tandze (Istoriya yaponskogo yazyka, 1. Rozhdenie yazyka et¬nosa). Tokio, 1965. S.90-111:
Cherevko K.E. Zvuko-i obrazopodrazhatel'nye narechiya v sovremennom yaponskom yazyke // Uchenye zapiski Instituta mezhdunarodnykh ot¬nosheniy. Vyp. 11. M., 1953. S. 152; Kile M. B. Obraznye slova nanayskogo yazyka. L.. 1973. S.73;
Azerbaev E. G. Vo¬prosy yapono-tyurkskikh yazykovykh svyazey // Avtoreferat diss. na soisk. uch. st. k. filologich. n. Alma-Ata, 1975. S.7-10.
Konrad I.I. Izbrannye trudy. Istoriya. M., 1974. S.301.
Spevakovskiy A.B. «Aynskaya problema» i ayny v etnicheskoy istorii dal'nevostochnogo regiona na osnovanii noveyshikh dannykh. SPb., 1992 (mashin. rukopis'). S.47.
Varenov A.B. Funktsioniroval li «Shelkovyy put'» v bronzovom veke? Novosibirsk, 1983. S.4.
Levin M.G. Etnicheskaya antropologiya Yaponii. M., 1971. S. 189.
Egami Namio. Gessi to geku (Yuechzhi i nefrit) // Adzia bunkasi kenkyu (Issledovaniya po istorii kul'tury Azii). Tokio, 1961. S.123-131.
A. N. Zelinskiy. Russko-evraziyskaya os' istorii: "o monografii Yu. N. Rerikha «Istoriya Sredney Azii» // Mir i politika, 2009, ¹2. S. 106.
Vorob'ev M.V. Yaponiya lll-VII vv. M., 1980. S.79.
Stepugina T.V. Kitay v kontse III-nachale I v. do n.e. // Vse-mirnaya istoriya. T.II, gl. XV. M., 1956. S.507.
Klyashtornyy S.G. Drevnetyurkskie runicheskie pamyatniki kak istochnik dlya istorii Sredney Azii // Avtoreferat diss. na soisk. uch. st. k.i.n. M., 1962. S.9.
«Shi tszi» («Istoricheskie zapiski»). Gl.123. S. 1a.
Yu.N.Rerikh vsled za buddiyskim monakhom Kumaradzhiva schital tokharskim yazyk tekh yuechzhey, chto ne otkochevali posle nashestviya khunnu // Sbornik pamyati E.A.Bertel'sa. M., 1964. S.121.
«Tsao Tan shu» («Starye tayskie istorii»), Gl.40. S.376.
Pulleyblank E.A. Sogdian colony in Inner Mongolia // Tung Pao. Vol.XLI. 1952. P.317-356.
Okladnikov A.P. Novye dannye po istorii Pribayka¬l'ya v tyurkskoe vremya (Sogdiyskoe poselenie na Urge?) // Istoriya i kul'tura Buryatii. Ulan-Ude, 1976. S. 34-43.
Derevyanko E.I. Tyurkskie elementy v pogrebal'nom ob¬ryade amurskikh plemen-1 tys. do n.e. Novosibirsk, 1970. S.118-128.
Shavkunov E.V. Sogdiyskaya koloniya v Primor'e VIII-X vv. // Materialy po etnokul'turnym svyazyam narodov Dal'nego Vostoka v srednie veka. Vladivostok, 1988. S. 100-105;
Shavkunov E.V. Velikiy shelkovyy put' i sobol'ya doroga sogdiytsev // Formirovanie i razvitie trass Ve¬likogo shelkovogo puti v Tsentral'noy Azii v drevnosti i srednevekov'e. Tezisy doklada mezhdunarodnogo se¬minara YuNESKO. Tashkent, 1990. S.74;
Glukhareva O.N. Iskusstvo Korei ot drevneyshikh vremen do kontsa XIX v. M., 1982. Illyustratsii 25, 33, 92.
Malyavkin A.G. Sogdiyskiy torgovyy soyuz // Informa-tsionnyy byulleten' Mezhdunarodnoy assotsiatsii po izucheniyu istorii kul'tury Sredney i Tsentral'noy Azii. Vyp.15. M., 1988. S.54.
Iakinf (Bichurin). Kitayskie izvestiya o narodakh, obi-tavshikh v Sredney Azii i Yuzhnoy Sibiri v drevnie vremena. T.2. M., 1950. S. 10-11 (ssylka na «Shi tszi». L.115).
Pak M.N. Opisanie koreyskikh plemen, nachalo nashey ery // Sovetskoe vostokovedenie. 1961. ¹1. S. 127-128,
Kyuner N.V. Kitayskie izvestiya o narodakh Yuzhnoy Sibi¬ri, Tsentral'noy Azii i Dal'nego Vostoka. M., 1961. S.243.
Inoue Mitsusada. Nikhon kokka-no kigen (Proiskhozhdenie yaponskogo gosudarstva). Tokio, Ivanami seten, 1966. S. 186;
Isida Eyti i dr. Simpozium «Nikhon kokka-no ki¬gen» (Simpozium «Proiskhozhdenie Yaponskogo gosudarst¬va»), Tokio, 1966. S.58.
Dr. John Covell and Alan Covell. Korean Impact on Japa¬nese Culture. Japan's Hidden History. Hollym International Corp., New Jersy, Seui, 1990. P.6-23.
Ueda Masaaki. Kikadzin (Prishel'tsy). Tokio. Tyuo koronsya, 1965. S.50.
Teykiti Esida. Teoriya obshchnosti proiskhozhdeniya yapon-tsev i koreytsev // Genday-no esupuri 1966. ¹11. S.81.
Gumilev L.N. Ritmy Evrazii. Epokhi i tsivilizatsii. M., 1993. S.290;
Shavkunov E.V. Primor'e i sosednie s nim rayony Dunbeya i Severnoy Korei v MP vv. n.e. // Trudy Sibirskogo otdeleniya AN SSSR. Dal'nevostochnyy fi¬lial. Ser. istorii. T.1. Saransk, 1959. S.47.
Shavkunov E.V. Sogdiysko-iranskie elementy v kul'ture bokhaytsev i chzhurchzheney // Problemy drevnikh kul'tur Sibiri. Vladivostok, 1985. S. 140.
Vorob'ev M.V. Drevnyaya Koreya. M., 1961. S.98 (so ssyl¬koy na kitayskuyu khroniku «Bey shu» («Istoriya severnykh dinastiy»).
Bernshtam A.N., Kyuner N.V. N.Ya.Bichurin (Iakinf) i ego trud «Sobranie szedeniy o narodakh, obitavshikh v Sredney Azii v drevnie vremena». Vvedenie k odno¬imennoy rabote N.Ya.Bichurina. T.1. M.-L., 1950.
Iofan H.A. Kul'tura drevney Yaponii. M., 1974, S.89.
Vostochnyy Turkestan v drevnem i rannem sredneveko¬v'e. M., 1992. S.16.
Konrad N.I. Zapad i Vostok. M., 1966. S.355.
Vorob'ev M.V. Drevnyaya Yaponiya. M., 1961. S.99.
Zijood-Naraghi M. A. Study on the Idea of the «Cosmic Mountain»: Regardim the Communication of Garden Culture between Ancient Japan and Pefrsia // Transactions of the Conference of Orientalists of Japan. ¹XXXI Tokyo. 1986 P.126-127.
Iofan N.A. Kul'tura drevney Yaponii. S. 172. 200-201
Gumilev L.N. Khunnu. M., 1960. S.94.
Vorob'ev M.V. Drevnyaya Yaponiya. M., 1958.
Ris, XI ¹10;
Vorob'ev M.V. Drevnyaya Koreya. M.. 1961.
Ris. XXIII. ¹4.5.
Okladnikov A.P. Olen'-zolotye roga. Khabarovsk. 1989. S.165.
Kyuner N.Z. Kitayskie izvestiya o narodakh Yuzhnoy Sibi¬ri, Tsentral'noy Azii i Dal'nego Vostoka. M., 1961. S.243.
Umehara Sueji. Ancient Mirrors and their Relationship to Early Japanese Culture // Acta Asiática. 1963. ¹4, P. 70-79; Kuznetsov Yu.D., Navlitskaya G.B., Syritsyn I.M. Istoriya Yaponii. M., 1988. S.14.
Shavkunov E.V. Susheni — praayny (K postanovke problemy). Vladivostok, 1990. S.21.
Litvinskiy B.A. Orudiya truda i utvar' iz mogil'nikov Zapadnoy Fergany. M., 1978. S.74-75, 103. Tablitsy 16/5, 16/7, 25/1, 25/.
Dzharylgasinova R.Sh. Etnogenez i etnicheskaya istoriya koreytsev po dannym epigrafiki (Stella Kvangetkhovana). M., 1979. S.104.
Cherevko K.E. U istokov shakhmatnoy igry // Nauka i reli¬giya. 1991. ¹6.
Okladnikov A.P. Novye dannye po istorii Pribayka¬l'ya v tyurkskoe vremya (Sogdiyskaya koloniya na r. Unge?) // Tyurkologicheskie issledovaniya AN SSSR. M., 1963. S.276.
Litvinskiy B.A. Drevnie kochevniki «Kryshi mira». M., 1972. S.45-49.
Kiselev SV. Iz istorii kitayskoy cherepitsy // Sovet¬skaya arkheologiya. 1959. ¹3. S. 170-177.
Shavkunov E.V. Velikiy Shelko¬vyy put' i sobol'ya doroga sogdiytsev // Formirovanie i razvitie trass Velikogo Shelkovogo puti v Tsentral'noy Azii v drevnosti i srednevekov'e. Tezisy doklada mezhdunarodnogo seminara YuNESKO. Tashkent, 1990. S.74.
Shavkunov E.V. Sogdiyskaya koloniya v Primor'e VIII-X vv // Materialy po etnokul'turnym svyazyam narodov Dal'¬nego Vostoka v srednie veka. Vladivostok, 1983. S. 100-105.
Marshak 5.I. Sogdiyskoe serebro. Ocherki po vostochnoy torevtike. M.,1971. S. 40-41
Koren' R.V. Tsivilizatsiya v rakurse etnogeneza kak istochnika kul'tury // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki. - 2013. - 6. - C. 159 - 192. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_715.html
Manoylo A.V. Tsennostnye osnovy upravleniya mezhtsivilizatsionnymi konfliktami: rossiyskaya model' // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2012. - 1. - C. 32 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2012.1.279. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_279.html

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard