Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Shipovskaya, L. P., Gemonov, A. V. Philosophical Interpretation of Heraldic Symbols in Russia During the Mongol-Tatar Yoke

Abstract: The present research is devoted to the topical issue in modern socio-humanistic studies. This issue has a cross-disciplinary nature and is a logical follow-up and development of the fundamental scientific ideas presented by Russian and foreign philosophers, cryptographers, historians and cultural researchers. The important part of the article is devoted to the role of heraldry and philosophical interpretation of the symbol in Russia during the period of 240-year dependence of Russian land on Mongol Empire. Each national culture is peculiar from other cultures. Semiotics allow to create a special view on social life of Russia during the Mongol-Tatar Yoke and define signs and symbols lying in the basis of Russian material and spiritual life back in those times. Semiotics also show what signs and symbols of the society influence individual consciousness and behavior. An important tool of semiotic analysis is the concept about connection between a symbol and a referent and how this connection influences individual consciousness and behavior.


Keywords:

socio-cultural space, symbolism, heraldic symbols, national mentality, symbol, referent, ‘nationality’ of culture, heraldry, coat of arms, sign.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Averintsev S.S., Davydov Yu.N., Turbin V.N., i dr. M.M. Bakhtin kak filosof: Sb. statey / Ros. akademiya nauk, Institut filosofii.-M.: Nauka, 1992.-S. 111-115.
2. Bakhtin M.M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugikh gumanitarnykh naukakh. Opyt filosofskogo analiza // Bakhtin M.M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva / Sost. S. G. Bocharov; Tekst podgot. G. S. Bernshteyn i L. V. Deryugina; Primech. S. S. Averintseva i S. G. Bocharova. — M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. — 424 s. s. 301.
3. Bibler V.S. Ot naukoucheniya-k logike kul'tury : Dva filosofskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat' pervyy vek: M.: Politizdat, 1991. 413 s. s. 19.
4. Bibler V.S. Dialog. Soznanie. Kul'tura (ideya kul'tury v rabotakh M.M. Bakhtina) / V.S. Bibler // Odissey. Chelovek v istorii. — M.: Nauka, 1989. S. 23.
5. Beletskiy S.D. Drevneyshaya geral'dika Rusi // «Povest' vremennykh let». SPb., Vita Nova, 2012. str. 431 – 463.
6. Belyy A. Simvolizm kak miroponimanie/Sost., vstup. st. i prim. L.A. Sugay.-M.: Respublika, 1994.-528s. – (Mysliteli XX v.)
7. Galanin A.V. Ariyskie traditsii // Vselennaya zhivaya [Elektronnyy resurs] – Vladivostok, 2012-2013. Adres dostupa:http://ukhtoma.ru/traditions1.htm
8. Gerder I. Idei k filosofii istorii chelovechestva. M.: Nauka, 1977. 703 s.
9. Danilevskiy I.N. Drevnyaya Rus' glazami sovremennikov i potomkov (IX-XII vv.). M., 2001.
10. Ivanov M.K. Obraz vsadnika v iskusstve: ikonograficheskiy arkhetip. Internet-resurs. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.ibif.org.ru/articles/nachalo01/01-03.pdf S. 32
11. Ivanov S.A. Vizantiyskoe missionerstvo: Mozhno li sdelat' iz «varvara»khristianina?. M., 2003.
12. Karger M.K. Drevniy Kiev // Po sledam drevnikh kul'tur: Drevnyaya Rus' / nauch. red i sost. Fedorov G. B. M., 1953.
13. Kozhinov V. Grekh i svyatost' russkoy istorii. – M.: Eksmo, Yauza, 2006. – 480 s.
14. Lakier A.B. Russkaya geral'dika [Elektronnyy resurs]. Adres dostupa: .http://www.heraldrybooks.ru/text.php?id=90
15. Litavrin G.G. Vvedenie khristianstva v Bolgarii (IX – nachalo X v.) // Prinyatie khristianstva narodami Tsentral'noy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Evropy i kreshchenie Rusi. M., 1988. S. 58-59;
16. Mamardashvili M.K. Vvedenie v filosofiyu // Mamardashvili M.K. Neobkhodimost' sebya. M.: «Labirint», 1996. S. 13-19.
17. Mezhuev V.M. Ideya kul'tury. Ocherki po filosofii kul'tury.-M.: Universitetskaya kniga. 2012. 406 s. S. 311.
18. Pashuto V.T. Vneshnyaya politika Drevney Rusi. M., 1968.
19. Priselkov M.D. Ocherki po tserkovno-politicheskoy istorii Kievskoy Rusi X-XII vv. SPb., 2003.
20. Samokhvalov V. P. Psikhoanaliticheskiy slovar' i rabota s simvolami snovideniy i fantaziy. — Simferopol': SONAT, 1999. — s. 184
21. Sverdlov M.B. Kievskiy sobor sv. Sofii kak istochnik istoricheskoy informatsii // TODL. T. 55..
22. Soboleva N. A. Ocherki istorii rossiyskoy simvoliki. Ot tamgi do simvolov gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta-M.: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul'tur: Znak, 2006.-487 s.
23. Chumakova T.V. «V chelovecheskom zhitel'stve mnozi obrazy zryatsya». Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi.-SPb., 2001
24. Chumakova T.V. Obraz cheloveka v kul'ture Drevney Rusi: opyt filosofsko-antropologicheskogo analiza: dis. ..kand. filos. nauk: 09.00.13. – SPb., 2002.
25. Yung K.G. Dusha i mif: shest' arkhetipov. Per. s angl.– K.: Gosudarstvennaya biblioteka Ukrainy dlya yunoshestva, 1996. – 384 s. S. 216
26. Yung K.G. Noymann E. Psikhoanaliz i iskusstvo – M.: Vakler, 1998. 306 s. s. 26.
27. Yung K.G. Chelovek i ego simvoly – M.: Serebryanye niti, 2011. 352 s.
28. Eko. U. Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu – SPB.: TOO TK «Petropolis», 1998. – 432 s. S. 51
29. Elias N. Pridvornoe obshchestvo. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2002. 314 s.
30. Bilous O.M. Derzhavno-tserkovni vidnosini yak ob’ºkt politologichnogo analizu: Avtoref. dis. … k.polit.n. Kiïv, 2004. S. 2.
31. Kalevi Kull: Vegetative, Animal, and Cultural Semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones // Cognitive semiotics. Issue 4-Spring 2009-Anthroposemiotics vs. Biosemiotics
32. Schütz Alfred Scheler’s Theory of Intersubjectivity and the General Thesis of the Alter Ego» // Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, March, 1942, c. 323—347
33. Ottfried Neubecker Heraldry: Sources, Symbols and Meaning. Tiger Books International (1997). 288 pages.
34. «The quest for meaning». University of Toronto Press Incorporated, 2007, Toronto Buf-folo London. S. 153