Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Konstantinov, M. S. The Burden of Virtue: Moral Concepts of Communitarianism

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes the key concepts and associate moral frames of the political philosophy of communitarianism from the point of view of the integrative cognitive approach. The author appeals to publications by such communitarians as Michael Sandel, Alasdair Macintyre, Charles Tylor and Michael Walzer in order to reveal the conceptual frame-based structures of their moral argumentation. Theintegrativecognitiveapproachinvolvesacomprehensive study of interdependence of political morals and ideology. Such a study is performed based on the combination of methods from activity and conceptual approaches as well as the frame analysis. Specific feature of this approach is the study of the means of moral motivation and the logic of purposes of political actions that are engaged in cognitive and axiological structures (‘basic concepts’ or ‘moral frames’) of political ideologies. Among the main concepts of communitarianism the author of the article underlines the concepts of ‘community’, ‘welfare’ and ‘virtue’. These concepts are associated with the frames of civic consciousness, responsibility for actions performed by the community, commitment and etc. The results of this research can be of interest to a wide range of both Russian and foreign researchers who conduct studies in the spheres of political theory, political ethics, moral and political philosophies.


Keywords:

morals, politics, ideology, political philosophy, frame, concept, liberalism, communitarianism, justice, virtue.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kimlika U. Sovremennaya politicheskaya filosofiya: vvedenie. — Moskva: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta-Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 2010. — 592 s.
2. Makintayr A. Posle dobrodeteli: Issledovaniya teorii morali. — Moskva, Ekaterinburg: Akademicheskiy Proekt, Delovaya kniga, 2000. — 384 s.
3. Potseluev S.P., Konstantinov M.S. Moral'nye freymy politicheskikh ideologiy: bazovye ponyatiya i metodologiya issledovaniya // Politicheskaya kontseptologiya: zhurnal metadistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy. — 2012. — ¹ 3. — S. 206–211.
4. Rolz Dzh. Teoriya spravedlivosti. — Novosibirsk: Izd-vo Novosib. un-ta, 1995. — 536 s.
5. Sendel M. Liberalizm i predely spravedlivosti // Sovremennyy liberalizm: Rolz, Berlin, Dvorkin, Kimlika, Sendel, Teylor, Uoldron. Moskva: Dom intellektual'noy knigi, Progress-Traditsiya, 1998. — S. 191–218.
6. Sendel M. Spravedlivost'. Kak postupat' pravil'no? — Moskva: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2013. — 352 s.
7. Uoltser M. Kompaniya kritikov: Sotsial'naya kritika i politicheskie pristrastiya XX veka. — Moskva: Ideya-Press, Dom intellektual'noy knigi, 1999. — 360 s.
8. Mulhall S., Swift A. Liberals and Communitarians. — Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 1996. — 364 p.
9. Sandel M.J. Democracy's discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. — Cambridge & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1996. — 417 p.
10. Sandel M.J. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. — 231 p.
11. Sandel M.J. Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics. — Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press, 2005. — 292 p.
12. Taylor C. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. — Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989. — 601 p.
13. Taylor C. Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. — Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. — 340 p.
14. Walzer M. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. — New York: Basic Books, 1983. — 346 p.
15. Walzer M. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. — Notre Dame & London: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994. — 105 p